Рубрика: Autosport News

Magnussen set for Baku F1 ban after Monza clash with Gasly


Kevin Magnussen is set for a Formula 1 ban after reaching 12 penalty points on his superlicence following his Italian Grand Prix clash with Pierre Gasly.

The Dane was hit with a 10-second penalty for contact with Gasly at the Variante della Roggia chicane, as the stewards had deemed him wholly to blame for the incident.

Read Also:

This also came with the application of two penalty points, which brings him the Haas driver up to the maximum of 12 in a year-long period. Magnussen should thus miss the Azerbaijan Grand Prix later this month, depending on any appeals process.

The stewards’ report read: «The stewards reviewed video and in-car video evidence. On the approach to Turn 4, car 20 attempted to overtake car 10 on the inside. 

«Whilst car 20 had its front axle past the mirror of car 10, the driving standards guidelines specify that an overtaking car has to ‘be driven in a safe and controlled manner throughout the manoeuvre’.  

«The stewards determined that this was not the case for car 20 and hence the driver was wholly to blame for the collision and hence the standard penalty and penalty points are allocated.»

Pierre Gasly, Alpine A524, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24

Pierre Gasly, Alpine A524, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

Magnussen had accrued his earlier 10 penalty points in the opening five races of season, meaning that a ban had long dangled above his head should he make any further indiscretions.

Although he avoided taking any more penalty points after picking up five during the Miami GP weekend, the two added to his tally at Monza moves him to the threshold required for a race ban.

Magnussen was «completely confused» by the decision, feeling that it was a smaller incident compared to the earlier clash between team-mate Nico Hulkenberg and Daniel Ricciardo that earned a larger penalty.

«I don’t understand it at all, just completely confused,» Magnussen said.

«Me and Gasly raced hard into Turn 4. Before, we had slight contact, we both missed the corner, came back on track again, no damage to either car, no consequence to the race of either of us, and I get a 10-second penalty.

«But lap one, Ricciardo put Nico in the grass at 300km/h, completely destroyed Nico’s race, massive consequence and damage to Nico’s car, and he gets a five-second penalty. Where’s the logic? I just don’t get it.»

Oliver Bearman, Haas VF-24

Oliver Bearman, Haas VF-24

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

It is currently unknown if Haas will appeal the decision, as Ollie Bearman and Pietro Fittipaldi remain on standby as reserve drivers.

Bearman has already raced this season as cover for Carlos Sainz at Jeddah, as the Spaniard was recovering from appendicitis, while Fittipaldi covered for Romain Grosjean after the Frenchman’s horror crash at the 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix.

Magnussen’s 12 penalty points

Saudi Arabian Grand Prix — Causing a collision with Alex Albon — 3 points

Chinese Grand Prix — Causing a collision with Yuki Tsunoda — 2 points

Miami Grand Prix — Leaving the circuit and gaining an advantage on multiple occasions — 3 points

Miami Grand Prix — Causing a collision with Logan Sargeant — 2 points

Italian Grand Prix — Causing a collision with Pierre Gasly — 2 points



Source link

Verstappen «never experienced something like» Monza qualifying balance swing


Red Bull’s Max Verstappen says he has never experienced the dramatic balance swing he suffered in Monza qualifying that saw him go significantly slower in Q3.

Verstappen could only manage seventh in qualifying for the Italian Grand Prix, nearly seven-tenths behind McLaren’s polesitter Lando Norris, as wild car balance swings made the three-time champion four-tenths slower than he was in Q2 despite using newer tyres.

The Dutchman and team-mate Sergio Perez, who qualified alongside him in eighth, have been struggling with balance problems on their RB20 since May’s Miami round, but with rival teams catching up in the development race Red Bull now no longer has the pace in hand to cover them up.

«For whatever reason in Q3 I picked up a lot of understeer on both tyre sets and this is something that I don’t understand at the moment,» said Verstappen.

«It was just not drivable anymore. I couldn’t attack any corner, so that’s something that is very weird.

«I mean, going four-tenths slower than what you did in Q2 is not normal. The balance difference that I had in Q3 was very weird. Never experienced something like that before.»

Red Bull had looked competitive as late as Q2, and its race pace on Friday also looked more promising and on par with its competitors, with the team known to usually run very conservative engine modes in Friday practice.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

But Verstappen cautioned that his car’s puzzling balance limitations are also set to impact tyre wear, which could limit his options to progress on Sunday.

When asked if he can still get in the hunt for victory, he replied: «Normally not. The whole weekend already we were too slow.

«The long runs might look good on paper but it didn’t really feel like that personally. The problem is that when you don’t have a balanced car, of course in the race that is also quite painful on tyres.

«So let’s see. Maybe with how the car is at the moment it might be a little bit better for the race but we’re also starting in the back of the top group.

«We’ll just have to wait and see what happens in front of us. There are a few unknowns with the graining naturally as well. We’ll find out tomorrow.»

Perez felt that Red Bull’s lack of a specific Monza rear wing also hurt the team «more than we thought».

«This connection in the balance that we’re currently facing is the main issue,» he said. «We can get some competitive laps at times, but it’s very difficult to have any progression.

«I think not having a Monza wing as well has hurt us, probably more than we thought in the beginning.»

Not only are the mid-corner balance shifts robbing Red Bull’s drivers of confidence in the car, but the car displaying two different but interconnected traits in the same corner is an indication of why Red Bull appears to be struggling to find a solution.

Dialling out understeer or oversteer on its own is one thing, but when both occur in the same corner, trying to fix one part of the problem will likely just make the second part worse.

«You have two different balances; one from corner entry and one through the apex, so you cannot fix it,» the Mexican explained. «You cannot go in one direction because you have both.

«I think we understand the issue. It’s just how to fix it. Because at the moment we are pretty stuck and it’s really hard to move forward from here.»



Source link

McLaren 20km/h faster on Monza straights than last year


Lando Norris says McLaren can now go 20km/h faster down Monza’s straights compared to its 2023 Formula 1 car after topping Italian Grand Prix qualifying.

Norris claimed his fifth career F1 pole at Monza, with team-mate Oscar Piastri second ahead of Mercedes’ George Russell, the Ferrari pair and Lewis Hamilton.

Max Verstappen was the lead Red Bull driver in seventh – his lowest qualifying at Monza since 2020.

This is a shock given the straight-line aerodynamic efficiency and DRS prowess that are key to being quick at Monza were previously important strengths of the Red Bull package in the new ground-effect era since 2022.

This is of less importance than at the more technical Spa track that traditionally has been paired with Monza in terms of where certain cars are strong or weak, due to the Italian track’s comparative lack of high-speed corners and turns overall.

When asked by Autosport if tow tactics had been key to McLaren’s result at Monza on Saturday, Norris explained how instead “we were quick on our own” due to the work the team has done to improve aero efficiency.

McLaren qualified down in seventh and ninth at the same event last year, with Piastri ahead and Norris struggling to pass Williams driver Alex Albon in the race, which he called «probably one of our worst races last year” ahead of this weekend’s action commencing.

Lando Norris, McLaren F1 Team, gets out of the car in the pit lane

Lando Norris, McLaren F1 Team, gets out of the car in the pit lane

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

“When you compare this year to last year, we’re like 20km/h or something quicker in the straights,” Norris said in the post-qualifying press conference.

“It’s a lot. Last year we were pretty shocking in the straight, which came as a bit of a surprise, but it shows the difference between when you’re not prepared to when you’re prepared for a race, where we were last year to where we are now.

However, Norris played down the impact of McLaren’s major Zandvoort upgrade as being key to its Monza performance so far this term, with Piastri also highlighting how “the baseline of the car was really kind of set earlier in the year and we’ve been able to gradually improve it a bit”.

Norris added: “For sure – every little counts. We’ve definitely been taking some smaller steps forward, but some of the upgrades we’ve had have been track-specific.

“The rear wing that we had, which was the main part of the upgrade last weekend, we’ve run it again here. So, it’s not like what worked perfectly well there works here so.

“We had that, but we also had the rear wing again this weekend.

“So, it’s specific things, but it’s not like revolutionised the car or made the car feel like it’s a lot better.

“It’s just a bit more efficient. It’s smaller things, but smaller things make big differences in the end.

“If you have one or two smaller snaps [less] over a single lap, you can gain half a tenth, one-tenth, quite quickly because the tyres are in a better condition, the temperature is less, and things like that.

“It definitely helped, but I think less than maybe what people expected. Like, a lot of parts but nothing which means, ‘we’re going to be 0.3s quicker all of a sudden’.

“So, steps forward, but we need more still. As well as we’re doing, we believe we can do more and I think when we go to our debriefs and stuff, there’s plenty of stuff that Oscar and I complain of and would like to be improved and we’re working hard to continue to try and do that.”



Source link

Hamilton leads Russell for Mercedes 1-2 in tight FP3


Lewis Hamilton headlined the final free practice session of Formula 1’s Italian Grand Prix weekend, 0.093 seconds clear of Mercedes team-mate George Russell.

In a closely contested session, in which the top six were all within a quarter of a second, the two Mercedes cars displaced Charles Leclerc from the leaderboard’s zenith in their final fresh soft-tyre runs in preparation for qualifying.

In the opening runs, the times swiftly entered the 1m20s bracket, opened by Oscar Piastri on softs, but further improvements continued to emerge; Lando Norris, Carlos Sainz, Russell, and Leclerc all spent periods on top as the opening 30 minutes closed.

Alex Albon then went fastest after the first half-hour had elapsed, going 0.018s quicker than Leclerc’s benchmark on the soft tyres, before Sainz set a 1m20.463s lap to end the Williams driver’s five minutes atop the order.

Leclerc logged a 1m20.226s on his next effort, a time that looked to be under threat from Norris on the McLaren driver’s next run, but the Briton lost time in the final sector. Piastri then went 0.01s quicker than Norris, subsequently facing a near-tangle with Leclerc on the exit of the second Lesmo.

The Mercedes duo then swept to the top, Russell posting a 1m20.210s before Lewis Hamilton found a tenth on his team-mate to go fastest — Russell reporting that his lap felt «pretty rubbish» by comparison.

Regardless, it was good enough to remain as the second-best lap; 0.016s faster than Leclerc’s third-fastest time.

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes F1 W15

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes F1 W15

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

The two McLarens were fourth and fifth, Piastri retaining his one-hundredth advantage over Norris, while Max Verstappen was a tenth further back. Verstappen echoed his usual concerns that the «car doesn’t turn in the low-speed, medium-speed» corners, and fluffed his final attempt having struggled through the Lesmos — although capped it off with a fastest final sector. By comparison, team-mate Sergio Perez was down in 18th.

Carlos Sainz was seventh in the order, ahead of the Williams duo; Albon was eighth, while new team-mate Franco Colapinto was 0.3s behind but nonetheless stood ninth in the final order. Nico Hulkenberg was 10th quickest, albeit with the fastest opening sector of the session.

Kevin Magnussen was asked to stop his Haas on track at the end of the session with an unspecified problem, and the Dane pulled up on the run to Ascari.

F1 Italian Grand Prix — FP3 results



Source link

What we learned from Friday practice at the 2024 F1 Italian GP


The 2024 Italian Grand Prix is baking – 3°C hotter (at 34°C ambient) than in the 2023 Monza race so far, with a near 10°C accompanying rise on track temperatures. This may well combine with the major track surface change here to significantly alter race strategy.

Again this term, four Formula 1 teams seem to be in the hunt – based on what we’ve seen so far in Monza practice. Their identities will be no surprise.

But each of Red Bull, McLaren, Mercedes and home favourite of the leading quartet, Ferrari, have made a positive start to the track action at Monza. Only at Mercedes, which had Andrea Kimi Antonelli crash just 10 minutes into his F1 weekend debut, was there a clear down note on the day.

The Silver Arrows squad’s drivers were also complaining of a severe seat heat problem during FP2, while F1 finally got to see the true impact of the controversial track kerb changes at this legendary venue when the pack rolled out on Friday afternoon. And while Red Bull might not have been unable to show any performance running today, the feeling aboard the RB20 for its drivers is much happier than a week ago at Zandvoort.

Here then, is everything we learned from Friday practice at Monza, which offers an insight into how Sunday’s 2024 Italian GP might go for the frontrunners.

The story of the day

Andrea Kimi Antonelli had begun FP1 promisingly before crashing out at the Parabolica

Andrea Kimi Antonelli had begun FP1 promisingly before crashing out at the Parabolica

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

The Renault engine staff protesting in the Monza stands did so with great dignity from Autosport’s point of view at the pit exit at the start of FP1. The group in the grandstand opposite here – there was another in a tribune just before the finish line too – politely applauded Esteban Ocon and Pierre Gasly as they took their Alpines out on track at the session’s commencement.

We then headed for the famed Ascari chicane – where we saw how unlike with the previous savage, narrow kerbs at this sequence, the drivers are now throwing their machines onto the new, flatter variety. But although the line is slightly altered, at this stage of the weekend, the trackside spectacle is generally unchanged.

In the opening session, Antonelli went quickest on his first flying lap early on softs, then was set to go even quicker on his second run a few minutes later. But his tyres cried enough at the Parabolica and he spun off backwards – smashing George Russell’s W15 against the barriers.

Later, Max Verstappen shot to head FP1 with a late 1m21.676s flier, with Charles Leclerc and Lando Norris finishing second and third for Ferrari and McLaren respectively. The trio were covered by just 0.241s.

FP2 overall times

Pos Driver Team Time Gap
1 Hamilton Mercedes 1m20.738s  
2 Norris McLaren 1m20.741s +0.003s
3 Sainz Ferrari 1m20.841 +0.103s
4 Ricciardo RB 1m21.300 +0.562s
5 Alonso Aston Martin 1m21.316 +0.578s
6 Bottas Sauber 1m21.461 +0.723s
7 Magnussen Haas 1m21.499s +0.761s
8 Albon Williams 1m21.592s +0.854s
9 Verstappen Red Bull 1m21.610s +0.872s
10 Gasly Alpine 1m21.819s +1.081s

Mercedes working to repair Antonelli’s damage meant Russell missed nearly half of FP2 and so did a run plan much different to the rest. He popped in a time that elevated him from last to sixth in the closing minutes, while Hamilton led the way on a 1m20.738s.

Max Verstappen didn't manage to post a time on softs during the second session staged on the newly-resurfaced Monza layout

Max Verstappen didn’t manage to post a time on softs during the second session staged on the newly-resurfaced Monza layout

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

This came on the second of two soft tyre runs he completed on the same set of C5s just before Kevin Magnussen crashed and stopped FP2 with his off backwards and into the Lesmo 2 barriers.

Like Hamilton, and with a similar quick trip to the pits for a front wing flap adjustment, Norris had also gone quicker with his second set of softs but ended up just 0.003s slower than his Mercedes rival.

Oscar Piastri might’ve beaten them both, having set personal best sectors in Monza’s first two thirds on his first of two soft-shod fliers (with his second significantly slower, unlike for the leaders). But having to save a big oversteer snap exiting the third Ascari apex cost Piastri so much time running down the back straight he ended up 0.120s off Hamilton’s leading effort.

The obvious rebuttal to this interpretation of the data is that a more experienced driver would’ve known not to attack so hard so early and raise the tyre temperatures to the point they risked a crash later in the lap

Red Bull missed slotting in a true performance run here as Verstappen had to correct an oversteer snap to avoid his own Antonelli-like Parabolica shunt and so backed off from the runoff on what became his sole FP2 softs flier attempt due to Magnussen’s shunt.

For Sergio Perez, a gearbox issue being detected between Friday’s sessions meant he was another late FP2 starter. And although he tried a flying effort after the session restarted post-red flag, he wound up well off the pace and complained about “a few mechanical issues because we had to put the car together quickly” costing him time.

The Ferrari drivers were able to slot into third and fifth in FP2’s best times just before the Magnussen shunt, with Carlos Sainz leading the way for the Scuderia, 0.103s off Hamilton’s top time.

What the data tells us

The GPS traces have provided lots of information about Antonelli’s crash – with the Italian clocked hitting the highest speed through Lesmo 2 for all of FP1 and then having a higher minimum speed (by 8.6mph) than Verstappen on FP1’s quickest lap at Ascari just before he crashed.

He ultimately did so because these speeds had taken so much life from the soft C5s on Russell’s W15 at the time. Mercedes team boss Toto Wolff said afterwards that “what we have seen in one and a half laps is just astonishing”. So, it’s clear how Mercedes is trying to spin this, but the obvious rebuttal to this interpretation of the data is that a more experienced driver would’ve known not to attack so hard so early and raise the tyre temperatures to the point they risked a crash later in the lap.

Toto Wolff defended Antonelli after the young charger crashed in FP1

Toto Wolff defended Antonelli after the young charger crashed in FP1

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

But, this is also just how rookies find the right limit and Wolff is entirely correct to also insist “I’d rather slow somebody down than make him fast, because the second one is impossible”.

The GPS data also indicates that even if Verstappen had completed his FP2 softs flier, he was running in a conservative engine mode and so has much more potential to come over one-lap. Red Bull motorsport advisor Helmut Marko said of this: “Until that point [where Verstappen went off] he was two-tenths behind Norris but not with the normal engine power, like the others had.”

Potentially critically for Red Bull, its drivers and fans, Marko reported “we are much better than in Zandvoort” on the balance issues that wrecked things for Verstappen last time out at his home race.

Medium long-run averages (top four constructors’ teams only)                  

Pos Team Average Stint length
1 Red Bull 1m25.399s 14 laps
2 McLaren 1m25.507s 11 laps
3 Mercedes 1m25.529s 13 laps
4 Ferrari 1m25.612s 13 laps

The track changes played havoc with the FP2 long-runs, with one team source suggesting the times logged above must be treated with extreme caution because the drivers just haven’t yet figured out how best to push over a long stint on the new surface.

The tyre range is the same C3-C4-C5 selection as in 2023. But the new surface and hotter temperatures are combining to produce severe surface graining on the softs and mediums.

As soon as a driver pushed on in FP2, the issue bit them and their pace dropped. The hard basically hasn’t appeared as the teams are really trying to save these sets for the race. But, as far as the times can be relied upon for this reason, Red Bull ends Friday on the up in the long-run stakes.

Adding to the positivity for Verstappen’s squad, which has the RB20 back in low-drag specification with those high-waisted cooling gulleys, is that his FP2 long run was the longest of all the front runners at 14 tours. Although, only just.

Verstappen impressed with his times on long runs, offering hope for Red Bull after its Zandvoort defeat

Verstappen impressed with his times on long runs, offering hope for Red Bull after its Zandvoort defeat

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

The other main point to note is just how close things look across the leading teams, which applies to the performance runs for them too (except for Red Bull, obviously).

And although Ferrari is clocked at the back of the averages right now, Leclerc did set off pushing harder than any of his rivals and so paid the price on the graining factor. He also said, “driving the car felt nice and the upgrades we brought to the car are working as expected”.

Mercedes is just one week on from topping FP2 and then fading, so it’s wary of getting away with topping the second session at Monza just as it did at Zandvoort (there with Russell). Piastri’s Ascari wobble and Verstappen’s flying lap absence are key factors here.

The hot seat issue that was affecting Hamilton and Russell in FP2 also hasn’t been fully diagnosed, but Autosport understands that, as well as a possible rising ERS temperature theory, the most likely explanation is the W15s planks are rubbing all the way along the long Monza straights and so sending high-temperature spikes quickly to the drivers sat just above.

One way to solve this would be to raise the car slightly, with Mercedes also acknowledging that the car and its plank rubbing on the straights – and more on the kerbs here than ever before thanks to the track changes – mean it could be giving away a slight performance/time edge with this too.

How the track evolves from here will be key to who wins the Italian GP. With no rain expected, it will grip up significantly and this is predicted to help with the graining issue.

But right now the teams are working hard to assess whether or not this race has changed from a nailed on one-stopper (because of the big pitlane time loss factor) to the two-stoppers that Friday’s graining issue indicated is now a real possibility. Pirelli thinks the severe pitlane penalty – due the high speeds drivers still out can clock as rivals trundle along at the speed limiter – means the teams could yet be forced to employ major tyre management tactics.

While hardly stuff to get the pulses racing on paper for fans, it could meant an interesting pitstop timing affair and mean the Monza DRS trains that have characterised modern races here and made the overtaking challenge tricky can be broken, therefore improving the racing spectacle after all.

Can Hamilton stay at the front for qualifying, or will Red Bull and McLaren spoil his efforts to impress the tifosi?

Can Hamilton stay at the front for qualifying, or will Red Bull and McLaren spoil his efforts to impress the tifosi?

Photo by: Steve Etherington / Motorsport Images



Source link

Vowles «could have done without» Schumacher comments


Mercedes Formula 1 team boss Toto Wolff says Williams’ James Vowles «could have done without» his blunt evaluation of Mick Schumacher.

Mercedes reserve Schumacher was in the frame to replace ousted Logan Sargeant from this weekend’s Italian Grand Prix onwards, as was Red Bull reserve Liam Lawson.

With Red Bull wanting to be able to recall Lawson should it require his services on short notice, Vowles choice was then reduced to taking Schumacher or promoting from within, with his own reserve driver Franco Colapinto also qualifying for an FIA Super Licence.

But while Schumacher would have been a more experienced option, having had two F1 seasons at Haas under his belt, Vowles decided to back 21-year-old rookie Colapinto as he felt the Argentine had a bigger upside for his team and its academy.

«Mick has improved a lot from where he was in Haas, there is no doubt about it,» Vowles said.

Toto Wolff, Team Principal and CEO, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, with Mick Schumacher, Reserve Driver, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team

Toto Wolff, Team Principal and CEO, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, with Mick Schumacher, Reserve Driver, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

«He’s a competent driver, that I know. He had his time but he has done incredible work with Alpine, with Mercedes and with McLaren in the meantime.

«So the decision is do we put Mick in the car, and I think Mick would have done a good job, or do we invest in an individual that’s a part of our academy, that’s done hundreds to thousands of laps in our simulator, that’s driven the car, and on the data that we can see from how he’s performing, who’s making significant steps?

 

«I think both would fall into a category of good and not special. I think we have to be straightforward about this. Mick isn’t special, he would just be good.»

Wolff, who was vocal about hoping Schumacher would receive a second chance after a bruising experience driving for the struggling Haas team in 2021 and 2022, felt his former Mercedes colleague was too blunt about his protege.

«I’ve obviously known James for many years, he’s a strategist,» Wolff told Sky Sports F1.

«Sometimes he says things too straightforwardly. That was a statement he could have done without.

«Mick has won everything there is to win, from F4, F3 and F2, and then of course operated in an environment with Gunther [Steiner], who is brutally tough and that was perhaps not what he needed to develop as a driver.

«That’s why he deserved the chance. If you don’t give it to him, you shouldn’t comment on it, you should let everyone live. That’s my opinion.»

Colapinto completed the Friday of his maiden grand prix weekend with a 17th place in FP2, two-tenths behind team-mate Alex Albon in 13th and one second off the front-running pace of Lewis Hamilton.

In the wake of Colapinto’s F1 promotion, Williams announced deals with Argentinian companies Globant and Mercado Libre, bolstering its sponsorship roster for the rest of the season.



Source link

new F1 driver Colapinto’s first day


«To have the opportunity to be here, speaking to all of you, it’s a pleasure.»

New Williams driver Franco Colapinto there – addressing a packed scrum of Formula 1’s press corps in a sweltering tent at Monza that was in places five people deep.

Let’s see if he still feels that way after the nine races he will compete in to end this campaign in place of the ousted Logan Sargeant. After all, Lando Norris has grown weary of his expanded media duties – per F1’s rules – after just a few weeks now McLaren is firmly at the head of the pack…

But it was a sweet start for the Argentinian. He moved to Italy to pursue his single-seater racing dream aged 14 – learning Italian from mechanics at a kart factory before starting to climb the ladder from Spanish Formula 4.

He joined Williams’ Academy at the start of last year, and now that the team has moved to drop Sargeant after a string of underwhelming results alongside Alex Albon, he becomes its 55th F1 world championship race driver.

“I am just extremely grateful with Williams for the opportunity,” he added. “It came very late, of course, but I’m always ready.

“I was not expecting it, to be honest. I cannot explain you how happy I am to be here with Williams. They have been very supportive and the opportunity that they have given to me is insane.”

Franco Colapinto, Williams Racing

Franco Colapinto, Williams Racing

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

Less insane that Colapinto has been granted his debut at Monza – one of F1’s less technical tracks and where the Williams package has performed strongly in recent years.

“If I could choose a track to do my first race at,” Albon said when asked about his new team-mate in this weekend’s pre-event press conference, “I think Monza is one of the more forgiving ones. Better than Baku or Singapore.”

Colapinto can also see out the 2024 campaign without the pressure to earn a 2025 F1 race seat – at least not at Williams, which will have Carlos Sainz join Albon for next year. Colapinto says “I have no idea about next year” at this stage regarding his plans for 2025, where he could return to F2 competition.

Overall, this was a clear moment of excitement for youngster, who is out to grasp his chance solidly. Alongside this opportunity, Williams announced a new Argentina-based sponsor on Thursday evening.

Colapinto found out he’d be getting his F1 chance last Monday, when he was “in the Formula 2 sim, with MP [Motorsport], preparing the race with my team for Formula 2 here in Monza”.

Next, he was in Williams’ Grove factory, where he “prepared a seat” and “prepared in the simulator very well” for his second chance driving the FW46 after his FP1 outing at Silverstone in place of Sargeant.

“The race engineer, the performance engineer – they were giving me all their information, all their tips and details to be quick as soon as possible,” he continued. “To make that learning process a bit quicker.

Franco Colapinto, Williams Racing

Franco Colapinto, Williams Racing

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

“I am privileged that I was able to be in the [Williams] simulator for so long in the past, even though I was racing only in Formula 2, because at the end it prepared me a little bit more to Formula 1.

“To go through all those processes, to do so many things to do in the car, and I think to be doing laps and laps and laps there, it helped me a little bit to be a bit more comfortable today. I sit in the car and I know the wheel and many things that are sometimes a bit difficult.”

Colapinto answered every question chucked his way across the congested pen area attached to the mixed zone area where F1’s TV broadcasters do their many interviews.

He started off open, gradually bringing his arms to fold in front of him as the 15-session wore on – even running over by five minutes given Colapinto’s generally effusive answers. A closer look at his hands revealed a slightly tremble, but by the end, with these wisely now placed in his pockets, the relaxed demeanour had returned.

He was particularly amused by a question asking if he feels like Argentina’s Lionel Messi before playing in the World Cup – having also left home and moved abroad at a young age in something of a parallel with the football megastar. At least, that’s what the question implied.

“I know how it is to feel that, but sometimes I see that they compare me and I am like, ‘you guys are crazy!’” Colapinto replied, gracefully.

“Like, Messi is god – you cannot do how you’re comparing me. But there is 23 years without an F1 driver from Argentina [the last being Minardi and Prost racer Gaston Mazzacane at the turn of the millennium]. So, it’s making Argentinians very happy because it’s a very special moment for all of them.”

Race winner Franco Colapinto, MP Motorsport

Race winner Franco Colapinto, MP Motorsport

Photo by: Williams

As he prepares to take to the Monza track six days after Sargeant’s enormous Zandvoort FP3 crash that effectively ended his F1 career, Colapinto’s final revelation from his first media grilling was that “we did” – he had spoken with the American since William’s brutal move was announced.

“It’s very tough,” Colapinto concluded. “I think it’s never easy for the team, for the driver, for the driver coming in to be changed in the middle of the season.

“And for all those things happening, it’s of course not nice for Logan. He had an amazing opportunity to get to F1. He had some very good performances.

“I think he got up to speed very quick in Formula 1 and of course it’s an opportunity that I’m going to take, whatever happens.

“I’ve been working to win in Formula 1 since I was very young, and this opportunity, you never know when it’s going to come back. So I am of course taking the chance. I’m going to try to do my best.

“I understand it’s very, very, very sad for Logan, but I think he had a great time in F1. He did a very good job. I hope he has a great performance in whatever he does next. He’s a very good driver.”



Source link

Red Bull to continue “Franken-floor” experiments at Italian GP


Red Bull plans to continue experiments with a hybrid version of its old floor at Formula 1’s Italian Grand Prix.

As the world champion squad seeks to answer why its RB20 has lost competitiveness compared to closest rivals McLaren and Mercedes, it has been evaluating whether the upgraded floor it introduced at the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix in May was the trigger for its problems.

In a bid to get to the bottom of matters, it fitted Max Verstappen’s car with an alternative floor version at last weekend’s Dutch Grand Prix.

This was based on the pre-Imola design that had won four of the first five races of the season.

However, it also incorporated elements of design improvements that have been introduced since then that the team knows definitely work.

The mish-mash of old and new elements has led to this version being informally described by one insider as a ‘Franken-floor’ – in reference to Frankenstein’s monster that was made up from different body parts.

Verstappen raced with this design at the Dutch Grand Prix but mixed weather conditions throughout the weekend meant it difficult to get a proper gauge on how it performed relative to the newer version that was run by Sergio Perez.

Red Bull plans again to split the configurations at Monza in a bid to get a better understanding of whether the new floor is the real cause of the RB20’s balance issues.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Alastair Staley / Motorsport Images

Speaking about the team’s understanding of the situation, Verstappen said: “The problem is that in Zandvoort with the wind and the rain it was very difficult to get a bit of a read.

“But again, [it is] a different weekend now. Of course, besides the stuff that we want to try in the car, the track is quite different. So, we also need to keep track on that to make the right calls.

“But yeah, we’re trying a lot of stuff to try and improve the balance of the car.”

While Red Bull’s experiments are aimed at getting answers on the balance differences between the old and new floor, Verstappen has no doubts that the latest version is faster.

Read Also:

Asked how he felt Red Bull would fare if it went back to the specification that he dominated the Chinese Grand Prix with, the Dutchman said: “I don’t think it will be faster, just that other teams, of course, they have been upgrading the car really well.

“So, for us to, let’s say, downgrading the car for a better balance, it’s not necessarily faster.”

Verstappen said that the critical improvement that was needed was getting the car back in a better balance window.

“I mean we know the balance problems, and now it’s up to us to try and make the cars just better to drive and more competitive,” he added.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

“I think we are understanding where we need to find stuff and what we see in the wind tunnel, what we see from CFD. That is not the problem.”

The Newey factor

Red Bull’s fall from form has coincided with the news that design genius Adrian Newey will be leaving the team at the start of next year.

Although he officially remains part of the operation, Newey has been removed from technical input – which some have suggested could be linked to the performance problems.

Asked if there was any link between the struggles and Newey’s exit, Verstappen said: “Normally not. It’s just since it was announced that he was leaving, it’s been more difficult.

“But I mean it shouldn’t matter if someone is, let’s say, leaving on the spot, that immediately the performance drops because the car has always been the same.”

Watch: Why Drivers are Unimpressed with Monza’s Updates — News from F1’s Italian GP Paddock



Source link

Renault F1 staff to protest 2026 Alpine engine plan at Italian GP


Renault’s Viry-Chatillon-based staff is planning on demonstrating against Alpine’s plan to become a Mercedes customer in Formula 1’s new engine era from 2026 onwards.

The French brand is poised to end its F1 engine project, which has been a mainstay of the world championship for the past 47 years.

This led the Social and Economic Council (CSE) of Alpine employees to publish a scathing statement last week, lamenting Renault Group CEO Luca de Meo’s call as “betraying its legend and its DNA by grafting a Mercedes heart into our F1 Alpine [car]”.

The decision could be confirmed on 30 September, with engine employees calling out the Renault leadership for allegedly ignoring their attempts to engage in dialogue.

PLUS: Why the biggest change Alpine’s chiefs want to see isn’t its engines

As a consequence, Viry-Chatillon employees are ramping up their fight to save their F1 future and are planning peaceful protests this weekend as the championship convenes in Monza.

The CSE has announced that Alpine Racing collaborators will gather in the grandstands on Friday, displaying “a clear and non-aggressive message advocating for the continuation of a French engine in F1”. They will be wearing white shirts sporting the Alpine logo and the #ViryOnTrack message, as well as black armbands.

The CSE has clarified that this action will not disrupt track activity in any way.

However, the CSE is also warning that “a large majority” of Renault’s engine staff at Viry-Chatillon will go on strike simultaneously and express its discontent “in a respectful but determined atmosphere”.

Pierre Gasly, Alpine A524

Pierre Gasly, Alpine A524

Photo by: Andrew Ferraro / Motorsport Images

Whether the strike will affect Alpine’s prospects in the Italian Grand Prix, and to what extent, is currently unclear.

Both Alpine F1 drivers were unsurprisingly asked about the conflict in their respective media sessions on Thursday in the Monza paddock and were cautious not to take sides.

Keen to focus on driving, Haas-bound Esteban Ocon commented: “It is, from what I heard, some peaceful protests. People want to talk, obviously, which is completely normal. And I hope that there will be some conversations between the parties.”

Read Also:

Meanwhile, Pierre Gasly added: “I have absolutely no power or control over that situation. It’s a team and top management topic.”

“So from this point of view, I’m focusing on my race, and the best thing I can do to every employee of the team is perform the best way I can on the track. To give them the rewards of all the hard work that every single employee is doing. That’s my role in the team and that’s what I’ll focus on.”

“I understand all parties. At the end of the day, hopefully everyone will come out of it with a good option.”

A statement from Alpine read: “We are aware of some activities planned this weekend from staff of Viry.

«We understand from their communication these will be peaceful protests and will not impact team operations.

«The transformation project is still being evaluated and no decision has been taken yet by Alpine’s management.

«The dialogue, which opened since the project was presented to the Viry employee representatives in July, is important to Alpine’s management and will be pursued in the upcoming weeks.”

Additional reporting by Oleg Karpov

Watch: How Norris Dominated Zandvoort by Such a Margin — F1 2024 Dutch GP Analysis



Source link