Рубрика: Autosport News

Exclusive: Tsunoda will be considered for Red Bull promotion if he keeps performing


Yuki Tsunoda remains in consideration for a Red Bull Formula 1 team promotion if he consistently delivers, according to RB CEO Peter Bayer.

In June RB announced Tsunoda would remain at the team for 2025 and in recent weeks he’s been overlooked for a Red Bull spot with Sergio Perez’s place under threat as he underperformed.

Read Also:

With the Red Bull organisation planning to keep both Perez and Daniel Ricciardo at their respective teams for the foreseeable future, next year’s line-ups will take focus, particularly if Perez is unable to solve his poor form.

Bayer has said Tsunoda will be an option for Red Bull if he performs at a consistently high standard.

“Helmut [Marko, Red Bull’s motorsport advisor] said it himself, in German you say a swallow doesn’t make a summer,” Bayer told Autosport. “What it means is that if Yuki keeps racing on this level consistently, he will be considered for a seat in Red Bull Racing.

“That’s ultimately exactly our mission and the mission we’ve been given by the shareholders, and if that means that he needs another season next to a very strong Daniel, that could be an option.

“It could also be an option [to] say that, okay, we now believe he’s ready. So [then] we’ll talk to Liam [Lawson]. We’re not in a hurry, despite all the people [who] think we are, because we do have all the options in our hands.”

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team talks with Peter Bayer, CEO of Visa Cash App RB after his crash during qualifying

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team talks with Peter Bayer, CEO of Visa Cash App RB after his crash during qualifying

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

RB team principal Laurent Mekies has rated Tsunoda’s improvement in his fourth year in F1 as “phenomenal” and has admired his ambition to move up to Red Bull.

“You expect a lot of things from a young guy between the first and the second year, maybe between the second and the third year,” Mekies said. “But you don’t expect that sort of phenomenal step between third and fourth, so — yes, he’s faster. Yes, he’s calmer. Yes, he’s better integrating the team, better feedback, hopefully happy!

“But seriously, he has been a reference point in the way that he gets out of the garage on Friday FP1 — and, bang: the first lap, he is there.

Mekies added: “Yuki is a Red Bull driver. He must have the ambition to drive for Red Bull Racing. If he doesn’t have that — it’s wrong.

“I hope and I trust that he wants more than anything else to drive that car to win races. We also try to help him developing him in that way. So that’s what the business is.

“Was he fully happy to extend with us to drive for us next year? Yes, [and] it’s a question for him but because what he tells us is that he is mega ambitious, he can see a team [that] is mega ambitious and the fit is obviously working.

“It helps him develop, he has paid us back with quite [an] incredible level of performance.”

Additional reporting by Filip Cleeren and Jonathan Noble



Source link

Where Verstappen now sits in the list of the all-time greats


Max Verstappen has now started 199 world championship grands prix – the same number as Alain Prost – won three Formula 1 titles and taken 61 victories. He’s third on the wins list and seems well on his way to a fourth world crown, so where does he sit in the pantheon of all-time greats?

Verstappen’s victory strike rate is currently 31%, behind just Juan Manuel Fangio, Alberto Ascari and Jim Clark, and very similar to Lewis Hamilton, Michael Schumacher and Jackie Stewart. Prost and Ayrton Senna, whose careers overlapped considerably, both had strike rates of just over 25%. Verstappen is thus very much worthy of comparison with F1’s best.

Statistics alone are notoriously fraught with pitfalls. Just the improving reliability of the cars and number of races per season skew things to such a degree that the data can only be a rough guide.

Comparing across eras is tricky, given how much motorsport has changed, so a reasonable place to start is the era-defining drivers, those regarded by many – including their peers – as the best of their time. In world championship terms, that gives us Fangio, Stirling Moss, Clark, Stewart, Niki Lauda, Prost, Senna, Schumacher and Hamilton. Then there are those who perhaps briefly held that mantle or could be regarded on a similar level, chiefly Ascari, Gilles Villeneuve, Nigel Mansell and Fernando Alonso.

Verstappen is well on his way to being the 10th name on the first list. It’s not yet guaranteed – the same could have been said of Sebastian Vettel in 2013 when he was on his way to a fourth consecutive title – but the Dutchman’s record already puts him in the debate, and most would regard him as the current benchmark.

PLUS: Where Vettel sits in the list of F1 greats

Verstappen’s qualifying pace has never been in doubt and nor has his wet-weather prowess – he already has more rain-affected GP wins than all but Schuey, Hamilton and Senna. He also proved he was capable of maximising a car that isn’t the best, brilliantly challenging for wins in 2019-20.

Verstappen has also dominated his team-mates since Daniel Ricciardo left Red Bull at the end of 2018. Ricciardo beat him in 2017 and had the momentum earlier the following season. He might not admit it publicly but, after mistakes in China and Monaco cost him possible victories that Ricciardo hoovered up, Verstappen upped his game. Mistakes became fewer and there is little doubt he had the edge over the Australian by the end of 2018.

Verstappen hauled his Red Bull to wins against stronger opposition throughout 2019 and 2020

Verstappen hauled his Red Bull to wins against stronger opposition throughout 2019 and 2020

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

During the same period, the dubious moves under braking that were apparent early in his F1 career also reduced and no other team-mate has got near him since. It’s probably fair to say he hasn’t faced a particularly stern test in that department – we’ve not seen a Lauda-Prost, Prost-Senna or Alonso-Hamilton contest – but his domination at Red Bull has been impressive.

His relentless race pace and ability to lap quickly while looking after the tyres, a la Hamilton, has arguably destroyed Sergio Perez (think the 2023 Miami and Belgian GPs). And Verstappen’s ridiculous tally of 19 wins from 23 races ticks another box of the greats: making winning in the best car look easier than it really is.

This season he has also proved his ability to win races that he probably shouldn’t have won given the relative strengths of his machinery, reminiscent of Hamilton at times in 2017-19. Think Imola, Montreal and Barcelona. Even when Red Bull is slightly off its game, others need to maximise what they have to beat him.

They are the strengths, so what are the weaknesses? What are the boxes, aside from taking on and beating a great team-mate, he has yet to tick that help us position him against the other greats?

Verstappen has always been unapologetically uncompromising, and some would see that as a strength

So far, Verstappen has only won races for one team/constructor. It’s a minor point but, when comparing the greats, every little counts. All of the Big Nine won GPs with at least two teams or constructors, with the exception of Clark. Verstappen is surely capable of winning elsewhere, it’s simply a box he hasn’t yet ticked.

Given some of his radio messages, most obviously at this year’s Hungarian GP, and public outbursts, it’s hard to imagine him helping to build a team into a winning force. He’ll get the job done in a top team, no question, but it seems unlikely that he could help create a powerhouse in the way that Schumacher did at Ferrari, or even have the sort of relationship Clark enjoyed with Lotus boss Colin Chapman or Stewart had with Ken Tyrrell.

PLUS: Who is the greatest of all time?

But the most obvious Verstappen drawback has reared its head once again during the current campaign. Unnecessary clashes with Lando Norris in Austria and Hamilton in Hungary demonstrate that he still strays over the line of what is acceptable in wheel-to-wheel combat.

Verstappen's inability to yield has cost him during his F1 career

Verstappen’s inability to yield has cost him during his F1 career

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

Verstappen has always been unapologetically uncompromising, and some would see that as a strength. It’s probably fair to say it has won him some races he might otherwise have lost, though this writer would argue that the way someone wins is as important as the winning itself.

Just in the tight 2021 season against Hamilton, there were dubious moves at Imola, Barcelona, Monza (twice), Interlagos and Jeddah. The highly controversial Silverstone clash, a rare case of Hamilton being adjudged the aggressor, could also have been avoided if Verstappen – then comfortably leading the championship and with the faster car – had kept an eye on the bigger picture, but that weekend probably requires an article of its own…

Across 2022 and 2023, some talked of Verstappen’s new-found maturity as clashes became few and far between, even in races when he had to bring his Red Bull through the field after grid penalties. But actually, there were signs.

His moves against Mick Schumacher at Silverstone in 2022 would probably have ended in a crash had Mick’s father been in the Haas and there was the (let’s be generous) ‘optimistic’ move on Hamilton at Interlagos later that season. Some of his first-corner moves on Charles Leclerc, most notably at the 2023 Las Vegas GP, were also borderline, though Verstappen has generally been fair with the Ferrari star.

Verstappen and his fans might argue that they don’t care about the above and it’s not a weakness. But they will care about the points that have been lost due to incidents.

Just as Senna both won and lost races due to his aggressiveness, Verstappen sometimes loses out. Although his clash with Norris at the Red Bull Ring was relatively small fry, Verstappen’s misjudgement there meant he scored a fifth place instead of a second.

And completely losing the plot in Hungary meant Verstappen got a fifth rather than a third, and it could have been worse had the RB20 not proved so solid after its aerial journey. It’s hard to imagine Senna or Schumacher – the two most like Verstappen when it comes to being hard on-track – not seeing the bigger picture and banking the optimum result on the day.

Verstappen has rivalled Senna and Schumacher for greats with a hard racing style

Verstappen has rivalled Senna and Schumacher for greats with a hard racing style

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

Verstappen doesn’t have a blot on his copybook as big as Senna’s 1990 Japanese GP takeout of Prost or Schumacher’s move on Jacques Villeneuve at the European GP seven years later – he didn’t take Hamilton off at Abu Dhabi in 2021 when he could have done. But he also hasn’t shown he can always make the right calls in a proper title fight and hasn’t put together a brilliant campaign against the odds as Stewart (1973), Prost (1986), Senna (1991) and Alonso (2012) did.

PLUS: Ranking the top 10 pre-war grand prix drivers

There’s still time for Verstappen to do either, which is why no definitive placing can be made just yet. As things stand, Verstappen is in the mix but has more gaps than most of the established legends, which puts him around 10th-15th.

That’s an incredible position for a 26-year-old and much of how high Verstappen climbs in the coming years will be down to him.

With Verstappen looking destined for a fourth F1 world title this year, how high can he reach in the championship's GOAT stakes?

With Verstappen looking destined for a fourth F1 world title this year, how high can he reach in the championship’s GOAT stakes?

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images



Source link

Alpine plans ‘quite big’ upgrade forming basis of 2025 car


Alpine is planning a “quite big” upgrade, which will form the basis of its 2025 car, for the final stages of the Formula 1 season.

The French manufacturer has had a challenging 2024 season, with its A524 challenger starting the year in Bahrain as the slowest on the grid. 

Since then the team has undergone major infrastructure changes, which has included the departure of technical director Matt Harman to Williams and the imminent exit of team principal Bruno Famin. 

Read Also:

However, there have been recruitments too – including Flavio Briatore as F1 team advisor and David Sanchez as executive technical director, while Oliver Oakes will become team boss after the summer break. 

Those changes come in parallel to the team making some solid progress on track. And, from those early days struggling at the back, it has become a more regular points scorer. The Enstone-based squad is currently eighth in the constructors’ championship. 

Now, following a hefty upgrade that arrived at the Belgian Grand Prix, the team has revealed plans for a big change coming for the end-of-season flyaways. 

Reflecting on the latest upgrades, Sanchez said: “This is a first step in the pipeline. We have another one, which should be quite big, and that should be the basis for next year. We will do more on this year’s car, definitely.” 

David Sanchez, Alpine Executive Technical Director

David Sanchez, Alpine Executive Technical Director

Photo by: Alpine

Sanchez said that after he had joined, the team had deliberately worked on a parallel programme to introduce two stages of upgrades. 

“We’ve been working on this one since day one,” he said. “The other one is an extension, using a bit more time to go further.” 

Asked when the upgrade was coming, Sanchez said: “A few races after the break.” 

While the early stage of the season saw Alpine struggling with an overweight car and big traction issues, Sanchez said now the team was mostly out of a problem-solving phase and was instead chasing pure performance gains. 

“The number one problem is for everyone finding more downforce and trying to design out some anomalies which we may see with the current car,” he said. “This [latest update] package is intended primarily for more downforce, but also a little bit more top speed.” 

Having only arrived at Alpine in May, Sanchez has not had much time to make sweeping changes to the organisation. However, he thinks that the ball is now rolling on developments that should leave it in good stead for the looming rule change from 2026. 

“From an infrastructure point of view, the team was already well advanced with its plans,” he said. “But we looked together about whether we needed to prioritize a few items more than others. 

“I think where we are now, the plan we have, if I look at ’26 and beyond, we should be in a good position. Now it’s more to get everything in the right direction with this car, the next one, and build more confidence in the team.” 



Source link

Tsunoda has everything to make next step in F1


Daniel Ricciardo reckons his RB Formula 1 team-mate Yuki Tsunoda has the ability to succeed in Formula 1, and believes the Japanese driver simply needs to prove he can execute when winning opportunities come his way.

Tsunoda has proven himself as RB’s de facto team leader over 2024, his fourth season in F1, but has been overlooked by Red Bull’s management as it considered Liam Lawson and Daniel Ricciardo as options to replace Sergio Perez at the lead operation.

Regardless, he has matured over the past two seasons and has subsequently delivered strong results for the AlphaTauri/RB squad despite 2023’s struggles with uncompetitive machinery.

Ricciardo now believes that Tsunoda is being looked upon much more favourably, noting his growing maturity and consistency over their year as team-mates.

«I think now he’s definitely getting probably the credit that he deserves,» Ricciardo stated in an exclusive interview with Autosport.

«Probably a lot of people still think about his first year where he made a lot of mistakes, and it felt like his adjustment into Formula 1, it just felt like maybe he couldn’t really adjust and it was all a bit too much.

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

«[In 2021 and 2022, Pierre] Gasly was consistently beating him, but then I remember the second half of that year, he actually started to probably have a better showing than Gasly.

«He’s definitely grown a lot in the last couple of years. So yes, he’s fast. Do I rate him? I do. He’s probably become a bit more aware of his attitude as well. I think he’s doing a really good job.»

Discussing Tsunoda’s prospects of delivering in the event that he ends up in a position with frontrunning machinery, Ricciardo felt that it was difficult to show that in advance — but reckoned that Tsunoda just needed to make the most of his ability.

The Australian compared that with Lando Norris’ attempts to win in 2021 and suggested the Briton did not have the experience to make it work out back then.

«I think [Tsunoda has] grown a lot in the last few years, and I think is showing some really good pace and skill,» he added. «I think he’s showing more consistency now.

«You just don’t know what happens when it’s the next [level], and I even look back at Lando in Monza. I won, he was second. The next race he was on pole, he was leading.

«In that moment the experience and the composure of Lewis [Hamilton] won him that race and lost Lando the race. Maybe three years ago, that was maybe a little bit too much for Lando.

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL35M , Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W12

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL35M , Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W12

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

«You just don’t know until you’re in that position if someone can really do it. We’ve all got the speed, but it’s like when the lights are fully turned up, who can still make those decisions and stay most composed.

«Yuki has to answer that in due time, but my answer is definitely not no. I do think he’s got the ability, but that part is up to him.»

Gasly, who partnered Tsunoda at AlphaTauri in 2021-22, understood his frustrations to be overlooked by Red Bull — and said that he had offered his former stablemate some sage advice.

«I always said Yuki is very fast. I’ve seen it. He’s been proving it the last couple of seasons and he’s going to keep proving it,» Gasly said.

Read Also:

«So obviously it can be quite frustrating for him. But I talked with him about this, we’ve had the conversations and I know he wants more and feels like he deserves more.

«I’ve been in a similar position to him in the past and what I kind of say, ‘Just keep doing what you’re doing, as long as you’re competitive, you’ll be given the right spot at some point’.

«But it’s not an easy position to be in. Personally, I would have liked to see him getting a shot at Red Bull — but I’m not Helmut Marko.»

Additional reporting by Oleg Karpov



Source link

Hamilton has benefited more from W15 F1 car gains


The Mercedes Formula 1 team thinks that Lewis Hamilton has benefited more than team-mate George Russell from the gains made with the W15. 

The German manufacturer had a tough start to the season, with its 2024 F1 challenger proving to be inconsistent and having a narrow performance window. 

However, as the squad has unlocked the secrets of its potential, the car has moved towards the front of the grid – and has now won three of the last four races. 

That step forward has also coincided with Hamilton being able to get more out of it, having struggled against Russell in the early stages of the campaign. 

Mercedes trackside engineering director Andrew Shovlin thinks that Hamilton’s form now is so much better because he was especially struggling with the characteristics of the car in its infancy. 

“I think early on, perhaps Lewis was finding the car more difficult to deal with,” explained Shovlin.

“One of the areas that we’ve improved with the car is being able to land with a set-up in first practice that is a good foundation to start building on performance, and then fine-tuning it. That helps your weekend enormously.

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG, with Andrew Shovlin, Trackside Engineering Director, Mercedes-AMG

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG, with Andrew Shovlin, Trackside Engineering Director, Mercedes-AMG

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

“In the early part of the year, we were making relatively small changes, and suddenly the whole car balance left us, and we were really struggling. 

“And, yeah, it’s probably fair to say that in the earlier races, Lewis was finding it more difficult to set up than George.” 

Mercedes and Hamilton are aware that the current generation of ground effect cars and tyres are not ideal for the seven-time champion’s driving style, as he cannot exploit his full potential in braking.

However, as Mercedes has unlocked more speed from the car,  Shovlin says that both drivers are now demanding similar things from it.

“There’s a certain driving style that suits these tyres,” he said. “You tend to find that the two drivers are never that far apart on set-up now.

“So once the car’s in a good window, the same thing’s working pretty well for both of them. And between sessions, they’re studying what the other one’s doing to try to find where the gains are.

“But through the year, the two of them have been working together. Early on, neither of them wanted to be finishing where we were, and they were able to help each other through trying different experiments with set-up and driving style. Overall, you progress as a team, and that’s how a team with two drivers works.”

George Russell, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, 1st position, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, 2nd position, in the the post race press conference

George Russell, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, 1st position, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, 2nd position, in the the post race press conference

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

Shovlin admitted that early races were a particular challenge for everyone because the team felt so close to the front, but was still not finishing in the positions it wanted. 

“In the first bit of the year, a lot of it was quite frustrating, because we were finishing fifth, sixth, seventh, and often you’d see that with just another tenth of performance we’d have been three places up the grid,” he added. “So we’ve made progress.  

Read Also:

“That’s why we’re able to now finish on the podiums. But regardless of whether the car’s quick or whether it’s not quick enough, if it’s slow, the drivers are always there helping us try and know what’s the next step, where’s the best place for us to spend our development resource and try to turn it into performance. 

“That hasn’t changed. It’s just with a quicker car, it’s all a lot more fun.”



Source link

Magnussen has no regrets about «wild and exciting» F1 comeback


Kevin Magnussen has insisted he has no regrets over his «wild» and «exciting» return to Formula 1 as he nears the end of his time with Haas.

The Dane was dropped by the team at the end of the 2020 season and made the switch to sportscar racing with Chip Ganassi, only for fate to give him an F1 reprieve.

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine spelling the end for Nikita Mazepin at Haas, then-team principal Guenther Steiner turned to Magnussen to fill the the vacant space at short notice ahead of the 2022 campaign.

Since then, the former McLaren and Renault driver secured his first pole position — albeit on a Friday ahead of the Brazilian Grand Prix sprint that year — though with performances dropping off this season, he will complete his time with the team at the end of the year.

Asked by Autosport in an exclusive interview whether he regretted returning to F1, Magnussen replied: «No, no, no, honestly, I don’t.

«I don’t regret it. It’s been fun and it’s fun trying something so unexpected. It was a wild journey, because I really closed that chapter, completely, mentally closed it, had a kid and completely started that next phase of my life with my wife and my family.

«Then — boom — back again, and that… this whole experience has been really exciting for me and my family.»

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-22, is greeted by his team at the finish

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-22, is greeted by his team at the finish

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

Magnussen’s first weekend back saw him rushed into competition with a lack of pre-season testing under his belt, yet he managed to pull a fifth-place finish out to underline his skill level.

On his feelings across that weekend, he explained: «I was sitting on a beach with a drink in my hand, completely not in a Formula 1 mindset and [then] suddenly panicking.

«From the beach to the airport bam, bam, bam, and then I was in the paddock, sunburned, like completely not in like the mindset. That whole transition was just wild and exciting.»

Whilst Magnussen impressed alongside Mick Schumacher in his first year back, the return of Nico Hulkenberg overshadowed his results last term and that form has continued into the current campaign.

«That’s to be expected when you step into Formula 1,» Magnussen said of the tougher times. «I was already an experienced Formula 1 driver when I came back, I knew what I was going back to.

«Nothing was really a surprise, so I knew. I knew there would be bumps and, I also knew it wasn’t going to be just smooth sailing and I knew there would be a honeymoon phase and then it would kind of, you know… all this I had, I had it all kind of thought through. It’s all part of it.»



Source link

Collins urges McLaren to ditch strategy calls by committee


McLaren has been the form team since a major car upgrade in May brought Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri their first race victories. But despite several chances to add to that tally over the summer, decisions on strategy have cost them.

 

At Silverstone, for example, the wrong call on when to pit and a poor tyre choice for the last stint cost Norris the win and favoured Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton.

Speaking on the James Allen on F1 podcast, Sky Sports F1 TV pundit and former F1 strategist Bernie Collins determined that McLaren needs to be more ruthless and not make high-pressure strategy decisions ’by committee’.

“I think that’s part of the issue with McLaren. When you’re asking a driver continuously what tyre he wants, you slow down the decision process naturally,“ said Collins.

“The more independence you can have for the people making those decisions, the quicker those decisions will be naturally. And you know, a bit of the Norris stop lap thing is when he’s so focused on whether it should be a soft, medium or hard tyre, he’s not thinking whether it’s intermediate or dry.

«Actually, the first question needed to be, ‘Which is the right lap to put on the dry?’, and let someone else deal with the other decision. And those are the teams that work the best together, when you’ve got this trust and independent thinking.”

Collins also doesn’t buy the line from McLaren this summer that they are still ‘learning to win’ after many years of being uncompetitive since the Hamilton/Jenson Button era in the early 2010s.

Simon Lazenby, Danica Patrick, Bernie Collins, Sky F1 Presenters

Simon Lazenby, Danica Patrick, Bernie Collins, Sky F1 Presenters

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

“Not really,» she reflects when asked on the topic. «Strategy in the midfield is as tough as strategy at the front.

“Some will agree or disagree, but you’re still fighting for every position, every point. McLaren in the past have been very good at strategy. I think there’s a little bit of movement of people there, a little bit on their pit wall.

«The people that you’re playing against change. So as you’re a midfield team or a lower midfield team, you’re competing against certain teams and you get to know how they react and how aggressive they might be.

“And as you move up, that changes and obviously the level you’re fighting against changes. I spent every race that I worked on analyzing every decision that everyone else made. And I feel like I had a pretty good idea why Red Bull were making decisions, why Mercedes were.

«I don’t doubt that McLaren are doing the same. As you move forward, this is what you’ve been waiting for. This is what the whole team have been waiting for, this opportunity.”

In a wide-ranging interview, Collins also opines on why the role of chief race strategist is one that women have excelled at in the last decade, whereas no women have reached the upper echelons of race engineering.

“At one point close to 50 % of the pit walls had a female strategist,» she said.

“I guess there are a few (reasons); the range of backgrounds that can feed into strategists. I don’t think there are enough females in engineering. Therefore to get the 10 best on the pit wall, it’s a struggle to have those as females. There are probably more strategists doing software and mathematics and those types of things and then more females and therefore that filters into the pit wall.

Sergio Perez, Force India and Bernie Collins, Force India Strategy Engineer

Sergio Perez, Force India and Bernie Collins, Force India Strategy Engineer

Photo by: Sutton Images

«I think some of the aspects of decision-making and pressure maybe lend themselves more to some of the females that are there.

“We don’t have any female race engineers and hopefully that is just a matter of time. But I think the time that you put into becoming that voice for the driver is quite a commitment to F1. People are sort of 10, 15 years in F1 before they reach that point. And maybe by that point, a lot of women have stepped away for other reasons. Whereas in strategy, I think that route is shortened.”



Source link

F1 a «closed chapter» for Porsche after failed Red Bull bid


Porsche’s aspirations to return to Formula 1 are now “a closed chapter”, the marque’s motorsport boss Thomas Laudenbach has revealed.

Laudenbach’s assertion that Porsche has no plans for a comeback more than 30 years on from its last engagement as an engine supplier with Footwork in 1991 represent the marque’s first comments about an F1 entry since the full unveiling of the 2026 regulations in June.

They follow nearly two years on from the breakdown of its prospective partnership with Red Bull Racing that would have involved it becoming a 50% owner of the team and its new powertrain division

At that stage, in September 2022, Porsche still talked about F1 as “an attractive environment” in the statement announcing that it was no longer pursuing the Red Bull option, but now Laudenbach has now stated that it is “not a topic for us”.

“It is off the table: right now F1 is not a task for us and we are not spending any energy on that,» he explained.

“We are only focused on what we do right now, and if you look at it, we have many different activities: we are well-occupied and extremely happy with what we do.”

Laudenbach pointed to Porsche’s wide motorsport portfolio, describing it as “nearly the perfect fit for the brand”.

Pascal Wehrlein, Porsche, Porsche 99X Electric Gen3

Pascal Wehrlein, Porsche, Porsche 99X Electric Gen3

Photo by: Andreas Beil

“We are engaged in customer racing from track days, GT4, one-make series up to professional GT racing [in GT3],” he explained.

“On top of that we are racing in the two most important endurance racing series [the World Endurance Championship and IMSA SportsCar Championship with the 963 LMDh] with our partner Penske.

“The third part, since electrification of our brand is very important, is our engagement in Formula E, which is the only full-electric series on a high level.

“I think we are really well served.”

Laudenbach also stated that Porsche had no interest in joining the IndyCar Series as an engine supplier.

Volkswagen announced in April 2022 that both its Porsche and Audi brands were pursuing F1 entries and that plans were in the “final evaluation phase”.

For Porsche those evaluations involved a link-up with Red Bull that ultimately foundered because, it said, the partnership it sought based on an “equal footing” could not be achieved.

Red Bull boss Christian Horner subsequently said that there was a “strategic non-alignment” and that the team didn’t want to diminish its “values and virtues”.

The Milton Keynes-based squad subsequently agreed a deal with Ford for 2026 to badge the new 2026 engine produced by Red Bull Powertrains.

Audi announced its intent to enter F1 for the first time in ’26 as an engine supplier in August ’22 and then took a minority stake in Sauber early last year before completing a 100% takeover this spring.

Porsche won a single world championship race during its first stint in F1 for the opening two years of the 1.5-litre formula starting in 1961, with Dan Gurney triumphing at the 1962 French Grand Prix at Rouen driving a Porsche 804.

Porsche was commissioned by McLaren to build the 1.5-litre turbo engine that ran with TAG (Techniques d’Avant Garde) badges and claimed the 1984, ’85 and ’86 world titles.



Source link

Bouncing has disguised Ferrari’s genuine progress


Charles Leclerc believes Ferrari has made genuine progress with updates to its 2024 Formula 1 car, although the side-effect of bouncing has severely masked the improvements to the SF-24.

When Ferrari introduced a new floor to the Spanish Grand Prix, the change in aerodynamic properties of the floor appeared to exacerbate an already-present level of bouncing in the car. This has been at its worst in the higher-speed corners, inducing unpredictability.

Ferrari reverted to the Imola-spec floor for the British Grand Prix to control the level of bouncing around the plethora of medium-high speed corners, and since had introduced a revised underbody for Hungary and Belgium to iron out those issues further.

Leclerc said that, although the outright numbers produced by the aero upgrades earlier in the year were as expected, the bouncing issues meant that these could not be fully reflected in the team’s performances.

«From Spain onwards, I think this was more the turning point where we brought something on the car, which the numbers, as I’ve always said, were there,» Leclerc explained in an exclusive interview with Autosport.

«However, it induced quite a lot of bouncing that we’ve been struggling with. And on my side, specifically, I went very aggressive in the last four races with set-up, especially, trying to find solutions for that.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Ferrari

«I’ve always been [aiming] to go for the last hundredths, and I think this is the approach that pays off whenever things are as they should be.

«Whenever you have a car, that is bouncing, for example, you cannot go too close to the limit because the car is doing more unpredictable things, and you’ve got to keep more margin.

«Which is something that I know I’m a bit… yes, it’s not my approach, and so always, I’m going to pay a little bit more of the price whenever these things happen.

«However, I don’t think that this was the main issue in the last few races. It was more about putting the car in very extreme places in order to get something out of it and to understand. That was the main reason for the lack of performance in the last few races.

«I will put that mostly on bouncing. The bouncing is what created the inconsistencies that we have seen in the last few races, and made us struggle a bit more than before that.»

Leclerc drew parallels to Ferrari’s progress last season, where it elected not to prioritise results to ensure that it had a stronger run-in at the end of the season.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Erik Junius

This led to a phase of experimentation at Zandvoort where Ferrari made a breakthrough with a new floor, leading into a successful second half of the year.

«I remember last year we had two races like that, and it started in Zandvoort where we decided, okay, maybe Zandvoort is not going to be the race for us, but we want to learn as much as possible in order to get better after that,» he said.

«I’m sure that this is the same process we have gone through in the last three-four races. However, the negative point about it is that we’ve lost three, four races instead of two last year.

«But I believe that that gave us a much deeper understanding of what was happening, and I’m confident to say that we’ve learned a lot.»



Source link