Рубрика: Autosport News

Red Bull turmoil will only have longer-term impact on F1 team


McLaren CEO Zak Brown doesn’t believe Red Bull has been too affected by the behind-the-scenes turmoil at its Formula 1 team yet, but thinks the squad might be impacted longer-term.

Red Bull has been embroiled in a power struggle ever since the passing of long-time owner Dietrich Mateschitz in 2022.

There has been a deepening rift between team boss Christian Horner, who enjoys the backing of the Thai majority owner, and the Austrian camp of incoming CEO Oliver Mintzlaff and Helmut Marko, who is inextricably linked to star driver Max Verstappen and his entourage.

Those tensions spilled out into the open at the start of 2024, when Horner faced an internal Red Bull probe over alleged wrongdoing against a female employee, a grievance that was dismissed by an independent barrister.

In the wake of the case, Verstappen’s father Jos made calls for Horner to leave, and tensions between the two flared up again at the recent Austrian Grand Prix. In the meantime, the squad’s talismanic designer Adrian Newey has announced his departure.

Brown, who was one of the paddock voices clamouring for more transparency over the Horner investigation, doesn’t believe Red Bull has been too affected by its power struggles just yet, but is expecting the inner turmoil to potentially be a factor as teams gear up for the 2026 regulations reset.

«I think the turmoil will have more of a mid- to longer-term impact,» he said. «Adrian Newey … this car was done last year, what they are racing now was done when everything was fine.

«It’s more ’26 when you’ve got a new engine coming, what’s going on with the driver front — that’s where you potentially are going to see the lack of stability that appears to be there maybe come through a little bit.

«Winning holds things together and, as that becomes more of a challenge for them, that’s where you might see some more fractures in various relationships inside that camp.»

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38, Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38, Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

But, with all F1 teams facing plenty of unknowns ahead of the 2026 season, when both the chassis and power unit regulations are undergoing sweeping changes, Brown is aware that 2025 could be McLaren’s best opportunity yet to challenge for the championship after working to get on par with Red Bull on pure pace.

«I think next year could be an epic season, right? You could have four teams fighting for the championship,» he said, while also acknowledging the likes of Aston Martin and RB could join the fray.

«It would be naive to rule out someone who’s not in the top four right now, because we do see how quickly things can change.

«Everyone has very similar technology, so there’s no reason why others can’t do what we’ve done the last year.»

Read Also:



Source link

Steiner’s advice for Andretti bid



Michael Andretti has been on a mission to get his eponymous team on the Formula 1 grid since before the FIA opened the tender process for new entries in February 2023.

Despite being the only application accepted by the governing body, Formula One Management ultimately rejected the outfit after a commercial agreement could not be reached with F1’s owners, Liberty Media. The door was, however, left afar for a potential union in 2028, the year in which its alliance with Cadillac would yield a power unit, introducing a new OEM into the field.

But changing his stance following the conclusion of the process, FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem stated that Andretti should “go and buy another team” rather than expanding the grid as an 11th team.

 

Speaking to James Allen on the JA on F1 Podcast, Steiner offered the same advice.

“Buy a team,” he said, before conceding, “but I don’t think there is a team out there to be bought. You know, that’s the dilemma.

“To do everything yourself is so difficult and, obviously, when you’re working there, I say it’s possible, but actually, I’m not saying nothing is impossible, you know, I give credit to everybody who tries but I always try to go the way with the best chance to succeed. And I think that will be to buy a team.”

Should Andretti join the grid in 2028, this would come two years after the introduction of a significantly changed set of technical regulations, with considerable power unit and aerodynamic changes set to be introduced in 2026.

While the FIA are open to making changes to the rules before locking them into place, Steiner said of the regulations: “Development in F1 never stands still technology-wise. The percentage of electric power is higher so the cars had to change to adapt to that, to the power unit. And I think the cars got very heavy. We should try to get them lighter because they need to be nimble, but it’s difficult.

“The biggest thing is batteries. They just weigh. I mean, you can’t do anything about it, not yet. Maybe in the future, I mean, F1 always develops stuff pretty quickly.

“So I think in general, it’s good that the cars are getting a little bit smaller because they’re really big.”



Source link

Uralkali claims Haas F1 has missed payment deadline after court ruling


Former Haas title sponsor Uralkali claims that the team has failed to pay a refund it is owed, plus delivery of a Formula 1 car, relating to its cancelled deal.

Last month, a Swiss arbitration court ruled in a dispute between the American-owned F1 team and its former Russian sponsor over the end of their relationship following the invasion of Ukraine in March 2022.

With Haas having terminated Uralkali’s title sponsorship on the eve of the 2022 season and dropped driver Nikita Mazepin, there had been a long-running dispute over the matter that eventually went to an arbitration hearing in Switzerland.

That court confirmed in June that Haas was within its right to terminate the sponsorship deal in the manner it did and that there was no breach of contract.

This meant no compensation was due to be paid to Uralkali for what happened.

However, it was also decided that Haas could only keep a portion of the $13 million sponsorship balance that had been paid to it for the season.

Haas was therefore ordered to give back the balance of the sponsorship payment that went beyond the March 4, 2022, date when the deal was cancelled. It is believed that this total is around $9 million.

Nikita Mazepin, Haas F1 Team

Nikita Mazepin, Haas F1 Team

Photo by: Carl Bingham / Motorsport Images

Furthermore, it was asked to fulfil a sponsorship clause in the contract that demanded it deliver a team race car from 2021 to Uralkali.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, Uralkali claims that the court deadline for the payment of the remaining sponsorship money, plus delivery of the car, had now passed without any action from Haas.

It said: “Regretfully, neither the money (plus interest plus costs) has been paid, nor the race car delivered by the required deadline.

“A letter sent by Uralkali to Haas in early July providing options for the delivery of the race car to take place went unanswered.  Further interest on the awarded sum continues to accrue.”

A Uralkali representative was quoted as saying: “Haas’ failure to execute the required transfers is a flagrant violation of the tribunal’s award as determined by an arbitration process signed on to by both sides. 

“This gives new meaning to the expression ‘unsportsmanlike conduct.’  Uralkali will use all means provided for under the law to see that the ruling is implemented.

“Let all current and potential Haas sponsors be aware of the kind of treatment that may await them.”

Haas did not wish to comment on the matter when approached by Autosport.



Source link

Horner’s pre-Goodwood F1 test drive an uplift in Red Bull positivity


Even for someone who has experienced 381 starts in Formula 1, it is interesting how the nerves can still get to you. Christian Horner has been at all of Red Bull’s races and overseen its 120 victories and 277 podiums. But until just under a week ago, he had never sampled one of the cars that had powered his drivers to victory.

So when the opportunity came up to drive Sebastian Vettel’s RB8 at Goodwood’s Festival of Speed, the very car the German won the 2012 F1 world championship in, it was too good an opportunity to turn down.

However, there was only one problem. Horner had not driven an F1 car since 1993, when he’d tested a Lotus that is now part of Aston Martin owner Lawrence Stroll’s collection of cars at the Norfolk team’s Hethel test track.

What followed was a last-minute opportunity for Horner to get a vital few laps in driving around Silverstone during a scheduled filming day — which proved to be an eye-opener.

«It was fun,» he said speaking after the Silverstone run where Liam Lawson had driven the team’s RB20 during the filming day. «It was the first time I’ve driven a Red Bull car and certainly the first time with a hand clutch and two pedals.»

He joked: «I wanted to set a benchmark for Liam! Sebastian was due to drive one of the cars but he’s on holiday with his family, and wasn’t able to make Goodwood.

«I haven’t driven a single seater since 1998 [in Formula 3000], and a Formula 1 car since 1993, so I thought well, there was the opportunity on Thursday just to drive a car with a hand clutch, and a left foot brake.

Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing

Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: JEP / Motorsport Images

«It was a great honour and privilege to drive one of these amazing cars, a championship winning car, so I was standing in for Sebastian.»

Horner showed me some videos of him starting from the pitlane; a standing start from the garage could have proved too tricky on his first run. He was quizzed how he found it and added: «I was flat on the straight for about three seconds! It’s mind-boggling how quick these cars are and just how much aero influence there is.

«The biggest thing that struck me is when I lifted off, it’s like somebody’s thrown an anchor out with the amount of aerodynamic braking. And particularly with a blown diffuser that there was on that car.

«It’s like heavy braking in a road car and then when you hit the brakes and you’re struggling to keep your chin out of your chest! So I enjoyed it so much, I missed the pit lane and I managed to squeeze in an extra extra lap!»

Horner’s press conference had taken place on the Friday, the day after his first run in a Red Bull. He was in relaxed mood in the motorhome while his son played with a toy remote control Red Bull car. Horner was there to unveil the RB17 hypercar with the soon-to-depart Adrian Newey.

There was no sign of any bad feeling between the two as they ripped off the covers off the RB17. In fact, after a short speech they shared a hug. It was like old times.

Newey has now departed his old office in the team’s HQ, which was adjacent to Horner’s, as he prepares to see out his time working on RB17 and the Red Bull Advanced Technologies department.

It was the same too on the Sunday. Ahead of the special run up Goodwood’s famous hill, there was plenty of positivity.

Christian Horner, Adrian Newey, Red Bull Racing

Christian Horner, Adrian Newey, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: JEP / Motorsport Images

Max Verstappen, Sergio Perez, Daniel Ricciardo, Mark Webber, David Coulthard, Newey and Horner all arrived at different times during the morning and exchanged pleasantries. The majority had been enjoying a cocktail evening celebrating the team’s anniversary the night before with current and former employees from the past 20 years.

Ricciardo was especially buoyant as he bounced around the motorhome and seemed genuinely happy to be there, fist-bumping everyone in the building. For someone who has faced countless questions about his future with Red Bull, he was certainly enjoying this moment and looked carefree.

Verstappen cut a more straight-forward vibe. He too was relaxed, enjoyed the run up the hill, waved to the fans before heading back to Southampton Airport and flying back to Monaco. Job done as he attended his first Festival Of Speed having watched it before online.

Even under-fire Perez was on good form. He put aside his poor fun of performances in F1 and drove the electric Ford SuperVan up the hill, which had the equivalent of 1,400bhp and managed not to generate any negative headlines.

Which brings us on to the main event and the Red Bull parade. Horner need not have worried about his inexperience in a F1 car, for he drove up the hill as planned in a wonderful procession that included Newey behind the wheel of the Aston Martin Valkyrie — a car he’d helped design with Red Bull, but also ironic given the rumours of him now joining Stroll’s team…

It was a poignant show of solidarity to celebrate the achievements of Red Bull after what has been a tricky seven months. Differences put aside, it was impressive to witness a universal moment of positivity and a reminder of its success.

That could all bode well for this weekend’s Hungarian Grand Prix, which comes at a crucial time when Mercedes are just pulling back into contention.

Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing

Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: JEP / Motorsport Images



Source link

The wider significance of Mercedes’ back-to-back F1 wins


Lewis Hamilton was pretty open about the emotional importance of his British Grand Prix triumph after 945 days without a Formula 1 victory.

While the ghosts of Abu Dhabi 2021 may never truly be banished, at least the fear of never winning again following all the controversy of that evening has been laid to rest.

But there is also a statistical significance to what Mercedes did at the British Grand Prix because it is the first time since the exact same closing stage of 2021 that it has managed back-to-back wins.

In the current era of Red Bull dominance, it has been slim pickings for the Milton Keynes-based team’s opposition, with its rivals mostly only coming away with one-off wins, like Carlos Sainz in Singapore last year.

You have to go back to the 2022 British/Austrian GP to find the most recent non-Red Bull back-to-back wins when Sainz and Charles Leclerc delivered victories at Silverstone and the Red Bull Ring in what ultimately proved to be the final flashes of potential from that year’s Ferrari before the RB18 hit its stride.

For Mercedes, its only previous victory in this ground effect era before George Russell’s triumph in Austria a few weeks ago was the Briton’s success in Brazil 2022 – which ultimately proved to mark a false dawn for the squad in feeling it had finally made a breakthrough in understanding its car.

George Russell, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, 1st position, celebrates on arrival in Parc Ferme

George Russell, Mercedes-AMG F1 Team, 1st position, celebrates on arrival in Parc Ferme

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

To find its most recent successive triumphs, the calendar has to be rolled back to the end of 2021 and Hamilton’s own last wins before Silverstone, when he rolled off consecutive victories in Brazil, Qatar and Saudi Arabia ahead of the infamous season showdown in Abu Dhabi.

But while the headline successes point to Mercedes getting back to its best in F1, there is also a bigger picture at play – and that is how the shift in the competitive form of the top four teams could well now shake up the constructors’ championship situation.

In fact, the teams’ battle is a particularly fascinating one because F1 is currently witnessing a situation where the two top teams are not delivering as much as those chasing then.

Red Bull’s constructors’ tally is being hurt by Sergio Perez’s repeated non-scores, while Ferrari has lost its way as the result of a terrible Canadian GP and issues with a floor upgrade it brought to the Spanish GP.

In contrast, McLaren has emerged as a consistent frontrunner since it brought an upgrade to the Miami Grand Prix, while Mercedes has hit its peak form after the potential of its new package was helped by a new front wing from Monaco and suspension revisions from Austria.

Since the Monaco Grand Prix (so the last four races: Canada, Spain, Austria, and Britain), the scores have put Mercedes on top. It has scored 125 points, compared to McLaren’s 111, Red Bull’s 97 and Ferrari’s 50.

The shift is even more significant if you take just the last two races, where Mercedes appears to have made a step. In Austria/Silverstone, it scored 70 points, compared to McLaren’s 58, Red Bull’s 43 and Ferrari’s 32.

The gap between Mercedes and Red Bull is currently 152 points, but with 12 races to go – on current form – it’s not an insurmountable feat if it can keep up its current points scoring form.

But even if the Red Bull gap may perhaps be a step too far thanks to the Milton Keynes-based squad’s super strong start to the campaign as others floundered, it’s the fight for the best of the rest that could get very spicy.

In fact, tracking the gap between current second-placed Ferrari and Mercedes shows how much has changed even though their positions in the standings have not.

At its largest after the Monaco Grand Prix, Ferrari’s 252 points scored up until then had it 156 clear of Mercedes.

But since then, the Italian outfit has been outscored by its German manufacturer rival at each of the four races, and the gap between them has come down to 81 points.

Cutting into the deficit by 75 points over four races means an average of 18.75 points per grand prix – which means that on current form it will take just five more races for the gap to be wiped away completely.

After the British Grand Prix, Ferrari team boss Fred Vasseur said he was under no illusion just how much the picture could change with his squad’s previously comfortable second place slot now at risk thanks to its upgrade struggles.

Frederic Vasseur, Team Principal and General Manager, Scuderia Ferrari

Frederic Vasseur, Team Principal and General Manager, Scuderia Ferrari

Photo by: Ferrari

«I don’t know how many points we are behind Red Bull and how many points we are ahead of – I don’t know who is P3, it’s McLaren probably,» he smiled.

«It’s not the topic of today, the topic of today is to find performance, to come back in the situation of Monaco, or Imola, and to be able to fight for the pole position and the win.

«Then the [constructors’] championship, we have still 12 races to go, it’s almost a championship. It means we’ll have time to change everything 10 times…»

But it may not take 10 races for everything to change. Mercedes’ successes in Austria and Britain were not anticipated — indeed the Red Bull Ring owed much to luck thanks to Lando Norris and Max Verstappen colliding — as it had set sights on better results at venues to come.

In particular, it is heading to Hungary where it has been on pole position for the past two years – and its form should be boosted by an upgrade.

As team boss Toto Wolff said: «[In Austria] we weren’t far off. When you look at the gap that we had before the crash, it was maybe two tenths a lap, a bit more. And that is the closest we’ve been for a long time — on a track that we didn’t like so much in the past.

Photo by: Autosport

«So that kind of gave us hints that it could be getting much better. But honestly, we didn’t think it would be Silverstone — because there was barely anything, just small stuff that we put on the car. We were more expecting Budapest to Spa. But we have justified that what we do is right at the moment.»

The delivery of a victory hat-trick this weekend, for the first time since 2021, would be confirmation that Mercedes is properly back, and that there is everything to play for in the championship.

Read Also:



Source link

How Haas is succeeding where Ferrari and Aston Martin are struggling


From heading into the current Formula 1 campaign braced to be at the back of the grid, Haas has far exceeded expectations.

With back-to-back sixth placed finishes for Nico Hulkenberg having thrust it towards the front of the midfield battle and it now locked in a tight fight with RB for sixth in the constructors’ championship, the German driver himself labelled it a “hell of a comeback.”

But what is important to understand about the surprise progress of Haas this year is the fact that this is not a story of the team simply producing a better car from the off and reaping the rewards from it.

Instead, while its VF-24 is an improvement on its predecessor, the key to its uplift in form has been in the way it has managed to keep up the trajectory of its in-season development programme.

That consistent progress has made an impact because it is something that other teams have struggled to deliver. After all, this is a year where updates are now widely being characterised as ‘upgrades’ or ‘downgrades’ depending on their success.

For example, Ferrari has most recently faced some headaches with a new floor it introduced at the Spanish Grand Prix, having brought back its high-speed bouncing issues.

Aston Martin found a new package it brought to the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix made its AMR24 trickier to drive on the limit, which has hampered its fight in the midfield pack.

Ayao Komatsu, Team Principal, Haas F1 Team, Gene Haas, Owner and Founder, Haas F1 Team, on the grid

Ayao Komatsu, Team Principal, Haas F1 Team, Gene Haas, Owner and Founder, Haas F1 Team, on the grid

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

For both teams, plotting their way out of these difficulties is made harder because the new parts have brought positives in terms of downforce, but they have triggered unintended consequences that have limited real world gains.

This phenomenon of updates not bringing everything hoped for seems to be a trend with the current cars and is one that even Haas has not been immune to. But how F1’s smallest team has managed to get on top of things so well, while its bigger budget rivals are struggling, is an intriguing matter – and one that the squad itself does not have an obvious answer to.

Haas F1 boss Ayao Komatsu says there is nothing unique his outfit is doing that others are not, but suspects it simply comes down to a new mindset that has been instilled this year.

Asked what the secret to Haas’s success was, he said: “I don’t know honestly, the only thing we can say is that we’re working together.

“Even when we are delivering new parts, like the sequence of updates after Miami, actually we didn’t deliver everything we thought we would — from the wind tunnel numbers, and CFD numbers.

“But as a team, when we had meetings [to discuss the new parts that did not deliver everything hoped for], what I was encouraged about was that nobody was denying it and fighting it. Instead, they said: ‘OK, we accept this is the case now we need to understand why.’

“Once you accept it, and everybody is working to understand it, then you can put that learning to the next upgrade. So maybe if there is a secret, that’s one of them. Everybody is working together with a transparent manner, and no blame culture.

Nico Hulkenberg, Haas VF-24

Nico Hulkenberg, Haas VF-24

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

“Even with this one [the British GP upgrade], I said on Thursday that until we run it, I don’t want to say anything about it because you never know. You never know beforehand what we missed, because it’s very easy to go wrong.”

This steady progress Haas has been able to make with its upgrades is in contrast to what happened at the team in the past.

Last year, a major development package brought to the United States Grand Prix did not work and its failings were exposed in Abu Dhabi when Hulkenberg, who had reverted to the old spec for the season finale, comfortably outqualified it.

Back in 2019, Haas also went through a spell where it chose to abandon a raft of upgrades it had introduced to go back to an older spec that appeared to be better.

This is why breaking this historic trend is so significant for Komatsu, and one he thinks could help unlock even more gains in the future.

“In the press, people have been saying that our aero guys cannot put an update on the car, but now we proved it [that they can] and nobody can deny we put performance on the car,” he said. “So that should give them lots of confidence.”

The underlying theme to it all though is that Komatsu feels the team is now harnessing potential that he thinks has been untapped for a while.

Nico Hulkenberg, Haas VF-24

Nico Hulkenberg, Haas VF-24

Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images

He added: “I’ve said it from day one. We’ve got talented people, we really have, but it was just a matter of putting it together. That is a top management problem.

“Once we solved that, and let them work, then this is the result. The team is still the same size, and we haven’t changed that many people. OK, [technical director] Simone Resta’s gone but other than that, not that much change.

“The structure is changed, and we repositioned a few people, but it was really more about creating the environment. We are recruiting now, so we should be a bigger team very soon.

Read Also:

“But even with the same resource as last year, and more or less the same people, this is what we can do. It’s amazing, no? That’s why I’m so pleased.

“If I had made a wholesale change, and achieved this, I don’t think I’d feel as good. Because I just knew, I believed, we got good people. I felt so frustrated and bad that those people were getting a really bad press, internally and externally. So, I’m so happy for that.”



Source link

Why F1 upgrade stumbles have become twice as costly


If there is one element that characterises Formula 1’s current era, it may well be the unpredictable form curves that fluctuate more than they did before 2022.

We have seen teams make giant performances leaps over the past few winters and throughout seasons, including McLaren, RB and Aston Martin.

But on the flipside, some teams have also been knocked back by upgrades that didn’t deliver or induced secondary issues on the car.

Two of the aforementioned teams, Aston Martin and RB, are among the squads that have seen their progress stunted by recent development setbacks.

Ferrari, which also made impressive race pace gains compared to 2023, has had to take its most recent batch of upgrades off its SF-24 because it induced bouncing in high-speed corners and has reverted to a specification from two months ago.

«We have basically the same car as in Imola and since Imola everyone has upgraded, probably added two tenths to the car and we have had to revert,» said Carlos Sainz. «We have lost two or three months of performance gain in the wind tunnel or performance we could have added in these three months, so clearly we haven’t taken the right calls recently.»

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Erik Junius

RB similarly had to take most of its Barcelona upgrades off, including the floor, and took a hit in the form table as a result.

Meanwhile, Aston Martin’s relative lack of progress has in recent weeks has also seen it slip down the order, leading to a frustrated Fernando Alonso.

Why are teams struggling with upgrades?

It is no news that these ground-effect dominant cars have been hard beasts to tame. Just ask Mercedes, which has been in the doldrums for two years before finally finding the right answers to make its cars regular challengers rather than «divas» that were unpredictable to drive.

With these cars, increasing performance is not as easy as just whacking aerodynamic load on and pray for the best, hoping downforce will solve most of the handling issues of the car.

More than ever, developing a current car is a game of compromises, with cars that perform well in high-speed corners often paying the price in low-speed corners and vice versa.

Developing a car that is well balanced across various corner types and speed is considered the holy grail, and while a lot of attention has gone to the floor area, the front wing and suspension set-up all play a part in having a car that has a wider operating window.

The low and stiff rides of these cars have also made bumps and kerbs a bigger factor. The simulation tools teams use are extremely advanced, but even those can’t simulate every variable a real-world environment throws at a car.

Alpine simulator

Alpine simulator

Photo by: Alpine

We have seen designers being taken for a spin by 2022’s crippling porpoising issues and some teams, like Ferrari, have seen bouncing return as an unwanted side-effect of a new floor design. Even Red Bull, which dominated the past two championships, still has a car that struggles for performance over the bumps, and that issue has bitten it hard on circuits like Singapore and Monaco.

«The correlation on the downforce is okay, but it is still a question mark for everybody,» said Ferrari team boss Fred Vasseur. «It is quite difficult to have correlation because you don’t have bouncing in the wind tunnel. You can have more bouncing with this part than another one but to know if it will have a negative impact on performance is another story.»

An additional factor is the ever narrower scope of upgrades teams are now chasing midway through the third year of stable regulations. The time of finding tenths of a second with each upgrade is over. As performance converges and the development curves have flattened out, we are talking about parts that produce half a tenth here and there. The smaller the gains, the harder it is to validate them and filter through the noise.

Why are upgrade misses more costly now?

The complexity of these cars is such that when an update doesn’t deliver or leads a team up the wrong path, it takes time to analyse as you can’t solve a problem you don’t understand. Not only does it rob a team of expected performance gains its rivals do manage to make, but it also delays the next upgrades as teams might have to re-think months of work and explore different direction.

«It’s a double negative effect,» RB team principal Laurent Mekies told Autosport. «Not only did you not pocket the advantage you wanted, but you also have to delay the next one until you actually understand what’s going on.»

Another reason why the plight of Ferrari, Aston and RB has been so pronounced is also a factor of how much the grid has closed up. At the Austrian Grand Prix a mere 0.798s covered the entire 20-car grid in Q1, and in Canada 0.021s was the difference between pole and the second row.

Valtteri Bottas, Stake F1 Team Kick Sauber C44, Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24, Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01, Zhou Guanyu, Stake F1 Team Kick Sauber C44, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Logan Sargeant, Williams FW46, Daniel Ricciardo, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Valtteri Bottas, Stake F1 Team Kick Sauber C44, Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24, Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01, Zhou Guanyu, Stake F1 Team Kick Sauber C44, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Logan Sargeant, Williams FW46, Daniel Ricciardo, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

Against these tiny margins, it doesn’t take much for a less than optimal upgrade to set a team back many positions. RB’s drop was quite dramatic as its car was actually slower with its Barcelona upgrades than it was without it. But even with less extreme examples, Alonso just missed the Q3 cut-off in Barcelona by a whisker, with RB’s Daniel Ricciardo befalling the same fate in Austria.

It’s therefore also important not to overreact to these fluctuations, as two or three tenths can be the difference between looking like a genius or a village idiot, neither of which is fair.

But when teams do get it right, fast-tracking an update one or two races earlier can be a huge boost even if the performance gain is relatively small.

«It’s a time to market business,» said Mekies. «Last minute, not taking the time to compare because you just want to move on and go fast.

«Sometimes you fall and that’s exactly what happened in Barcelona. We put the upgrade on both cars and it was very difficult to understand how to react, and then we took the time to pause in Austria to make the right comparisons, even though it was a sprint weekend.

«Of course, you will say: ‘Why don’t you do [the back-to-back test] all the time? Why you don’t take all the time you need?’ Because it’s a time to market business and if you are faster than the other guys with the same update, you will actually get more out of them.

«But it’s good for the team to have that high-risk mindset. It’s a highly competitive business and that’s what we want the company to do.»

Laurent Mekies, Team Principal, RB F1 Team, Jonathan Eddolls, Head of Trackside Engineering RB F1 Team

Laurent Mekies, Team Principal, RB F1 Team, Jonathan Eddolls, Head of Trackside Engineering RB F1 Team

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

Is short-term pain the way out?

In Ferrari’s case, it conducted those back-to-back experiments in British Grand Prix free practice. While there was some short-term pain as it compromised the weekend of Sainz and Charles Leclerc, Vasseur hoped there would be a long-term gain as the Scuderia now understands what it needs to do.

«It is very difficult as a team to compromise or sacrifice Friday sessions, because it means you put yourself in a tough situation, but it was the right call to do it,» said Vasseur.

«It is difficult to say after the [poor] result but we did a step forward. We have a better understanding of the situation on Sunday evening than on Friday morning. This is encouraging for the rest of the season.»

Read Also:



Source link

How Mercedes has shielded Antonelli from F1 media glare


Mercedes is enacting a plan to manage the media frenzy surrounding its Formula 1 junior Andrea Kimi Antonelli, which will advance whether or not he’s promoted from F2 for 2025.

Antonelli’s career has famously progressed at considerable pace, while the 17-year-old Italian’s close relationship with Mercedes team boss Toto Wolff after joining the manufacturer’s junior scheme in 2019 has long marked him out at as a future F1 star for the Silver Arrows squad.

But expectations surrounding Antonelli were raised massively in the fallout of Lewis Hamilton’s decision to leave Mercedes and join Ferrari for 2025 – in part because the seven-time champion had signed a two-year, 1+1 contract in 2023 that Wolff admitted had been so arranged in case Mercedes felt it needed flexibility to promote another of its juniors with Hamilton’s career potentially winding up.

Indeed, when Hamilton made his shock announcement in February, Antonelli was quickly touted as his most likely replacement even as other candidates, including later a surprise Mercedes swoop for Red Bull’s Max Verstappen that still remains possible, were assessed.

Things have swung back and forth in the months since, with Antonelli’s lack of headline F2 results in the early part of the season – including his pitstop stall the day after his Prema Racing team-mate Ollie Bearman had won the Austrian sprint race – seemingly giving Carlos Sainz renewed hope of joining Mercedes for 2025, based on Wolff’s comments to Spanish media.

But that was before Antonelli impressively scored his first F2 win in the tricky wet Silverstone sprint race.

Andrea Kimi Antonelli, Prema Racing

Andrea Kimi Antonelli, Prema Racing

Photo by: Prema Powerteam

After this, he faced the F1 press corps – gaining respect for admitting his victory “was needed” in his first answer of a session where he went from guarded (his arms crossed, shield-like underneath holding his microphone) to open.

His explanation of how an F1 car “gives you a lot of confidence when you drive it because it has so much downforce that you can really push it” was revealing in the context of how younger drivers are more regularly being rapidly promoted to the top single-seater categories.

Read Also:

These are expected to “swim”, as Wolff had repeatedly said in the same press conference room the day before.

That appearance in the official F2 press conference was only Antonelli’s second of the season, after he’d finished second in Melbourne qualifying.

Aside from the three-and-a-half-month time gap between those two sessions highlighting again that this F2 season has been rather a struggle for Antonelli and his Prema squad, it also showed two other elements.

The first was how he appeared much more confident following his Silverstone win — where, of course, the joy victory provides cannot be understated. This feeds directly into the second – in how Mercedes has been preparing Antonelli to face the media while also shielding him from it.

Aware it had to carefully manage Antonelli’s 2024, as well as needing to consider his young age in what can be a brutal sphere, Mercedes moved to tightly control his appearances.

Instead of allowing its junior to interact with and, to a certain extent, deal with media interviews and conversations in the F2 paddock directly as is typical – and how this writer dealt regularly with then Ferrari rising star Charles Leclerc in his rookie F2 title-winning season in 2017 in person and on the phone – Antonelli has been kept at arms’ length from those covering the junior category beat.

Andrea Kimi Antonelli,  Prema Racing

Andrea Kimi Antonelli, Prema Racing

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

But Mercedes has also been working in parallel behind the scenes with Antonelli – giving him in-house media training. As Wolff says, pressure on Antonelli is “going to get bigger” if his career progresses as expected.

Mercedes is also keenly aware that, if he is promoted to its F1 team, Antonelli will immediately be required to make regular appearances with its blue-chip sponsors and also interact directly with senior figures such as Mercedes-Benz Group CEO Ola Kallenius and INEOS boss Jim Ratcliffe.

The thinking behind Mercedes’ strategy is two-fold: in controlling Antonelli’s F2 media requirements, he could focus on adapting to a new category and his high-stakes season, and shielding him also additionally shuts out what can be a ferocious media market in his home country.

Autosport understands that Mercedes is likely to make Antonelli available for more media appearances as the 2024 season progresses, while further F2 successes will automatically get him more airtime.

His F1 future remains undecided, with Mercedes’ options, if it doesn’t feel he is quite ready to join George Russell and replace Hamilton at its works F1 team, including placing him at another squad further down the grid (say, Williams or Alpine) or indeed keeping him in F2 for 2025.

Andrea Kimi Antonelli, Prema Racing

Andrea Kimi Antonelli, Prema Racing

Photo by: Prema Powerteam

But it’s clear from another of his Silverstone press conference answers – “not always do I cope really well with pressure” – why Wolff is impressed with Antonelli’s wider abilities and not just his speed.

“What I like in terms of his attitude – generally his family, who has been always close to him – is the objective assessment of a situation, and that is ‘good or not good enough’,” Wolff replied when Autosport asked for his opinion on how his charge is coping with all the frenzy surrounding him in 2024.

“And I don’t think that the pressure harms at all the way he performs in the car and how he drives.

“You can clearly see it’s a good benchmarking with Ollie Bearman. They are pretty close. Ollie had an obviously very good race in Austria, and Kimi on the Sunday had a clutch release issue in the second race.

“So, you’ve got to swim. That’s clear. It was a rapid career progression. He’s 17. Hasn’t got even a driving licence for a road car.

“And the best ones will be able to cope with that, with the amount of scrutiny and the pressure, and it’s going to get bigger.”



Source link

Is Lawson the right driver for Red Bull to replace Perez with?


Just one month after Sergio Perez secured a two-year contract extension with Red Bull, his Formula 1 future seems to be unravelling.

Performance clauses are putting Perez at risk of losing his seat in a near future, as the grid becomes more and more competitive.

The Mexican has scored just 11 points in the four grands prix since his new deal was announced – fewer than Haas’s Nico Hulkenberg or Aston Martin’s Lance Stroll and far behind Max Verstappen’s tally of 86. What’s more, he is yet to outqualify his team-mate this season.

While Red Bull previously could afford for Perez to lag behind Verstappen, that is no longer the case with McLaren and Mercedes catching up in the constructors’ championship. The Milton Keynes-based outfit currently deems its driver’s form «unsustainable» and is reconsidering his position.

Key to Perez’s odds might be a seemingly innocuous filming day which Red Bull ran this week at Silverstone with arguably its hottest young prospect, Liam Lawson, in the car.

Although the team had to use demonstration tyres, Lawson was allowed to drive the RB20 over a maximum of 200km, which corresponds to 33 laps of the Silverstone grand prix layout.

This gives the team an opportunity to assess his ability, as it did with Daniel Ricciardo in more favourable circumstances a year ago – it was then a Pirelli test, so mileage was not limited and tyre compounds were in line with what might be used on a grand prix weekend.

Ricciardo and Tsunoda are failing to make an impact

Daniel Ricciardo, Visa Cash App RB F1 Team, Yuki Tsunoda, Visa Cash App RB F1 Team, during the driver presentation

Daniel Ricciardo, Visa Cash App RB F1 Team, Yuki Tsunoda, Visa Cash App RB F1 Team, during the driver presentation

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

It might seem surprising that Lawson is viewed as a credible candidate for a Red Bull seat after he was overlooked for an RB drive this year, with Ricciardo and Yuki Tsunoda retaining their positions.

Red Bull was hoping that one of them would show their credentials by clearly gaining the upper hand over the other, but it hasn’t happened so far – although Tsunoda has the advantage, having scored 20 points to Ricciardo’s 11 (but only 13 to 11 since the Australian got a new chassis in China) and leading 10-5 in their qualifying head-to-head.

Red Bull is therefore turning its attention to Lawson. The 22-year-old New Zealander has enjoyed success at every level, with his early achievements comprising a runner-up spot in ADAC F4 ahead of Enzo Fittipaldi and Frederik Vesti, Toyota Racing Series championship from Marcus Armstrong, and second in Euroformula Open in a field which included Yuki Tsunoda.

Lawson went on to take fifth place in Formula 3, just 21 points behind champion Oscar Piastri, then narrowly beat Logan Sargeant to third position in the 2022 Formula 2 season, while only just missing out on the DTM and Super Formula titles in 2021 and 2023 respectively – showing his versatility to be a key asset.

However, if anything made Lawson’s potential crystal-clear, it was his five-round stint standing in for Ricciardo at AlphaTauri when the veteran suffered a metacarpal fracture in free practice at the 2023 Dutch Grand Prix. The rookie wasn’t out of his depth compared to team-mate Tsunoda in qualifying and had a remarkable showing in Singapore, where he reached Q3 and achieved the team’s best result of the year until that point by finishing ninth in the race.

Liam Lawson, AlphaTauri AT04

Liam Lawson, AlphaTauri AT04

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Since then, Lawson has been biding his time and focusing on his role as Red Bull and RB’s reserve driver – which involves crucial set-up work on the simulator in Milton Keynes, as many young drivers performed for the team in the past before graduating to F1.

Stepping away from any kind of racing is never easy for a driver, but pressure has been increasing on Ricciardo. The Australian being replaced by Lawson as early as the summer break is plausible.

«The goal was that [Ricciardo] would be considered for Red Bull Racing with exceptional performances,» Red Bull motorsport advisor Helmut Marko told Austrian newspaper Kleine Zeitung two weeks ago. «That seat now belongs to Sergio Perez, so that plan is no longer valid.

«We have to put a young driver in there soon. That would be Liam Lawson.»

Lawson could then be evaluated with a view to fast-track him to the mother team in 2025. Or, Red Bull will perhaps pick him to replace Perez even earlier, which cannot be ruled out at this stage.

The New Zealander has admittedly not proven to be a once-in-a-generation talent yet, but his potential is plain to see and he has become a relatively safe pair of hands, having not retired in any of his latest 20 races, taking place in F2 and Super Formula.

Whether Lawson definitely is the best candidate for that Red Bull seat remains to be seen, but what is certain is the Milton Keynes squad will leave no stone unturned when it comes to assessing his skills. 

Read Also:



Source link