Метка: Emilia Romagna GP

MotoGP to return to Hungary in 2025 with new Balaton Park race


MotoGP has agreed a deal with the Balaton Park Circuit that will result in Hungary returning to the championship for the first time in 33 years.

As reported by Motorsport.com at the end of August, the recently-built Balaton Park Circuit on the outskirts of Hungary’s capital Budapest will be the most notable addition on the 2025 MotoGP calendar.

The organisers have set 22-24 August as the date for Hungary’s first premier class race since 1992, while the circuit will also hold a World Superbike Championship event on 25-27 July as part of the preparations.

It is expected that the Portimao circuit in Portugal, which has become an annual fixture on the calendar since making its debut in 2020, will make way for Hungary on next year’s schedule.

“We’re very happy to announce that Balaton Park will be on the 2025 calendar for MotoGP and WorldSBK,” said Carmelo Ezpeleta, CEO of Dorna Sports.

“The circuit is in a spectacular location and will be a fantastic destination for fans to come and see the world’s most exciting sport in action.

“Work is under way to get the venue ready for its historic debut on the calendar, adding another chapter to Hungary’s history in motorcycle grand prix racing, and we’re very much looking forward to returning to a key market in central Europe.”

Balaton Park

Balaton Park

Photo by: Balaton Park

The event will be organised and promoted by HUMDA Hungarian Mobility Development Agency Zrt., a part of the Szechenyi University Group.

Prior to staging WSBK and MotoGP races in consecutive months in 2025, the circuit will undergo a number of changes to meet the FIM’s requirement for a Grade A Licence.

Firstly, two smaller radius corners will be added to the inside of the track at Turn 7, where the run-off area will also be expanded. A new chicane will replace the original Turn 11 to reduce speed and increase overtaking opportunities.

Finally, a new combination of technical corners will be incorporated just below the circuit hotel to increase the challenge for the riders.

MotoGP is expected to announce the full 2025 calendar in due course.

Hungary last hosted a round of the world championship was in 1992, when Eddie Lawson won on a Cagiva at the Hungaroring, a track which is now more famous for hosting the annual Formula 1 Hungarian Grand Prix.



Source link

Ducati sure it can avert «disaster» as Marquez joins Bagnaia in 2025


Ducati’s general manager Gigi Dall’Igna is convinced that the Italian marque will be able to manage both Francesco Bagnaia and Marc Marquez at its factory MotoGP team next year.

Ever since Ducati signed six-time premier class champion Marquez to partner reigning double champion Bagnaia for 2025, there have been question marks about how the two will get along with each other at the same team.

The Borgo Panigale marque has by far the best bike on the grid and it’s likely that next year’s title will be fought exclusively between its riders, leaving the possibility of tensions flaring up as Marquez and Bagnaia set to battle on equal machinery for the first time in MotoGP.

However, Dall’Igna sees no reason why Ducati should be concerned about having two alpha personalities in the same garage.

On the contrary, he thinks, it will be a chance for the brand to extend its dominance in MotoGP in the final two years of the current regulations cycle.

«They are two of the best riders of the championship, but for sure their characters are really, really strong so it’s important that we can manage them very well during the next year,» he told the official MotoGP website.

«But honestly I’m quite confident that we can manage that and I hope that it will not be a disaster but the perfect year for Ducati.»

While admitting they have strong personalities which have the potential to cause problems, Dall’Igna was full of praise for both Bagnaia and Marquez for what they’ve achieved in their careers so far.

Gigi Dall'Igna, Ducati Corse General Manager

Gigi Dall’Igna, Ducati Corse General Manager

Photo by: Gold and Goose / Motorsport Images

Bagnaia is now the most successful rider in the history of Ducati, while Marquez’s back-to-back victories in Aragon and Misano are seen as a sign that there is more to come from him in the coming years.

«For sure Pecco is one of the most important riders in Ducati history and probably the most important because nobody won two riders championships [with Ducati],» he said.

«Ducati is a different bike in comparison with the bike [Marquez] rode for all his career. He adapted quite well and quite soon honestly.

«He is an eight-time world champion so he is one of the most important riders of the history of the MotoGP and I think it’s the reason why he performed so well with our bike.»

Pramac rider Jorge Martin leads Bagnaia by just seven points heading to this weekend’s Emilia Romagna Grand Prix, while Marquez and Enea Bastianini also have an outside shot at this year’s title.

Dall’Igna reiterated that Ducati will ensure all four riders will get equal tools to battle for the championship, even as Martin and Bastianini prepare to leave for Aprilia and KTM respectively next season.

«We are really really happy and proud honestly of the job that we did,» he said. «We have four riders in the front of all the others.

«We have a lot of riders that can fight and try to win at the end of the weekend. Pecco and Martin will be the two contenders, but also Enea and Marc have some chance to achieve the results.

«We give to all of them the best possible chance to reach their goals, this is our job from the beginning to the end of the season and we will do that.»



Source link

Rossi takes another aim at Marquez over bitter 2015 MotoGP feud


MotoGP legend Valentino Rossi has once again pointed the finger at Marc Marquez over a bitter feud that he believes cost him an eighth championship in the premier class.

Rossi missed out on winning the 2015 riders’ title by just five points to Yamaha team-mate Jorge Lorenzo during a season in which he often clashed with Marc Marquez both on and off the track.

The Italian accused the then-Honda rider of conspiring against him to aid Lorenzo’s bid for the title, and their relationship has never recovered since then.

Recalling his illustrious racing career on two-wheels in the MigBagol podcast hosted by VR46 Academy coach and former Moto3 rider Andrea Migno, the 45-year-old indicated that he still had unhealed wounds from one of the most controversial seasons in world championship history.

The two riders came to blows as early as the third round of the year, with Marquez retiring from the Argentine GP after hitting the M1 of Rossi, who went on to win the race.

“It’s the worst thing that has ever happened to me on a sporting level,” he said.

“The dispute with Marquez had started in Argentina. He had chosen the medium rear tyre, I had chosen the hard tyre. He got away, but I recovered and caught up with him.

Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team and Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing

Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team and Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing

Photo by: Repsol Media

“I caught him on the straight after Turn 3 and braked well to overtake him. I got there, went into the right-hand corner and up to that point we had always got on well, but he came at me hard.

“I passed him and he thought the only chance he had was to crash into me. He tried to knock me down straight away, he deliberately came after me to try and throw me off.

“He didn’t want to lose. I went back to my line [and] unfortunately we touched. You give it to me, I give it back to you. Then [Marc] went down.

“From then on our relationship fell apart. Despite that episode, he kept pretending to get along with me and kissing my ass.”

Later in Assen, Marquez and Rossi again made contact at the end of the final lap, with Rossi going straight through the chicane to score his third victory of the year.

“We got to the last lap and I’m always in front,” Rossi recalled. “In the last chicane I knew he was going to try. I tried to brake as hard as I could, but despite my extra braking he came at me again. He was going to throw me off.

Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing and Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team

Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing and Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team

Photo by: Repsol Media

“As soon as I felt him coming at me, I cut the chicane and won. I had braked to the limit, he braked in a way he would never have made the corner only to crash into me. I stayed up – not easily – I cut the chicane, I won, full stop.

“In the parc ferme he was pissed off, I had never seen a face like that. He said to me: ‘It’s easy to win by cutting [a corner]’.

“I told him that he was coming at me and asked him what I should do [in that instance]. I told him he had to be objective. From then on it was really over [between us].”

Rossi claimed that his assistant Uccio Salucci had started receiving warning messages from Marquez’s camp following the events of the Dutch GP.

He said: “I heard them, especially [Marc Marquez’s manager Emilio] Alzamora, going around the paddock saying that ‘now that we [Marquez] are not winning the title, he [Rossi] won’t win it either’.

“They told this to some Spaniards who said it to some Spanish friends of mine, who told me. They started telling me to be careful in the last few races. Even Uccio told me to be careful with Marquez.”

In the Australian Grand Prix, Rossi could finish no higher than fourth after a long battle with Marquez, who later went on to win the race.

Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team and Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing

Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team and Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing

Photo by: Repsol Media

Rossi maintains that Marquez did everything he could to prevent him from winning in Phillip Island. But his claim that the Honda rider was assisting Lorenzo’s championship bid is weakened by the fact that he passed his countryman on the final lap, denying him five crucial points in the title run-in.

“Marquez was so superior that he did the [whole] race fighting with me. He made me lose and then he also won,” said Rossi, now a factory driver for BMW.

“We are counting facts. If one [looks] at the times, that’s what he has done, it’s not an assumption [that he was purposely riding slowly for a long time]. It’s clearly what happened.”

The following week in Malaysia, Rossi publicly accused Marquez of trying to help Lorenzo win the title.

“In Malaysia I went against him in the press conference because I wanted to try to throw him shit at him, to say in front of everyone what he was doing, in the hope that he would stop doing it.

“Also because he had nothing to do with it. Lorenzo and I were fighting for the championship.

“If you are fighting for the title, then I could understand it. But if you have nothing to do with it, you are not even a team-mate [to the title contender], you have to have the respect not to piss other people off.

“You just have to do your own race, try to win and that’s it. But it hurt me in Sepang and it bothered me for the whole race.”

Tensions boiled over in the Malaysian GP, which featured the most infamous crash between the pair that left Marquez on the ground.

Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing, Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team

Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing, Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team

Photo by: Gold and Goose / Motorsport Images

Explaining what happened at Sepang from his point of view, Rossi said: “He had tried to make me fall three or four times and luckily he didn’t get me.

“I got very close to him and I looked at him and said ‘OK, what the hell are you doing?’

“We just touched. I didn’t want to knock him down, but he fell. He made me lose the world championship also because they made me start last in Valencia.”

It turned out to be the deciding moment in the title fight, with Rossi sent to the back of the grid in the Valencia finale as part of the penalty.

“After the race the stewards called me,” he recalled. “I was with Maio Meregalli from Yamaha and Marquez was with Emilio Alzamora, who started to insult me.

“I asked him why he was there as he was not from Honda. There was a bit of a scuffle. In the end Mike Webb announced that I would start last in Valencia, something that has never happened in MotoGP.

“Normally they would have penalised me at Sepang, instead of third I would have finished fifth.

“If they thought I had deliberately dropped Marquez they should have made me do it, instead they didn’t and made up the last starting position in Valencia. They cut my legs off, I had lost the world championship.

“There was Marquez with his head down. I told him that by doing this he was going to carry it for the rest of his career, because it’s disgusting for the sport to make someone else lose.

“The moment they told me I would start last, he actually raised his head, looked at Alzamora and smiled, nodding as if to say ‘we did it’.”

Second place qualifying for Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team and third place Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing

Second place qualifying for Marc Marquez, Repsol Honda Team and third place Valentino Rossi, Yamaha Factory Racing

Photo by: Repsol Media

Summing up his thoughts, Rossi described Marquez as the most “dirty” rider in the history of motorcycle racing, while reiterating that the Spaniard wanted him to lose the 2015 title.

“Marquez is a very strong rider, a champion,” he said. “He has always been quite rude, very aggressive, but in 2015 he crossed the line.

“If you are bad sportsman or aggressive you can be borderline dirty and I could give so many examples. But no one, among the big stars of motorsport, has ever fought to make another driver lose, that is what draws the line.

“Usually those who did certain things did it for themselves, they were dirty to gain their own advantage, because they wanted to win.

“Nobody has been as dirty as him.”



Source link

RB targets F1 start improvements to issues that are «hurting» results


The team’s VCARB 01 F1 car is showing impressive speed in qualifying – with its two cars having got into Q3 at Imola last weekend – but its race chances are being hurt by poor getaways.

At the Imola Grand Prix, both Ricciardo and Tsunoda lost two places off the start – which were hard to recover from because of the difficulty of overtaking.

PLUS: Why F1’s artificial racing tools are to blame for Imola race snoozefest

Speaking about the situation, Ricciardo said: “The starts, they’re hurting us at the moment.

“Honestly, I don’t know yet what the issue was. I didn’t feel like I botched it, as I felt like everything was going okay from the procedure, but we have to have a look. It’s so sensitive.”

Tsunoda added: “It is kind of a topic for our team, we’re working hard. We are really working hard for the starts throughout the races so far. We have improved a little bit, but we need a step more, because I would say consistency is not there. So, we have to look for the future.”

The Japanese driver suggested there were a combination of factors that were coming together to make life difficult: “I thought it was tyre preparation, and we’ve done a lot of tyre preparation work, but it’s not enough. I think it’s coming from also consistency with the clutch.

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

“Red Bull, having the same engine, they are able to have a consistent start. So, for sure there is something that we are missing or we have to improve.”

Team principal Laurent Mekies thinks that it is repeatability of the starts that needs improving, with the window for delivering the perfect getaway too narrow for its drivers to consistently hit it.

Speaking exclusively to Autosport, Mekies said: “The start is not any more a single performance item. You have the clutch, the drivers have the procedures, there are the drivers themselves, you have the tyres — and I probably forget quite a few items.

Read Also:

“It’s one of these things that is great in our sport, that we need to bring together many different departments to try to go to the next step, and that’s what we need to do.

“We have been a little bit inconsistent. We had very good start in Miami from high up in the grid against the big guys, but we have been a bit up and down this year.

“It’s like everything else in the car. We just need to do small steps altogether.”



Source link

F1 drivers who have been banned from racing and why


Haas’ Kevin Magnussen is just two superlicence penalty points away from a full race ban after accumulating 10 points over the first six races of 2024. The Danish driver doubled his penalty points over the Miami Grand Prix weekend for several reasons, including leaving the track multiple times to gain an advantage and causing a collision with Logan Sargeant.

Magnussen initially called the sprint penalties “well deserved” for his “stupid tactics”, but ahead of the Imola GP he confirmed he will “have to” race differently and “be careful not to get a race ban”.

When questioned about whether he thought there was something wrong with the current penalty point system, Magnussen said: «The fact that I’m at risk of a race ban for driving outside of some white lines – on a piece of Tarmac – I don’t know if I feel that that is right.

«But it is the way the rules are. I accept that but I feel there is room for improvement there. Not only in terms of the [penalty] points. There are more races now than there was back when they were introduced and I feel you can end up getting a race ban effectively for a very minor thing. That’s what I feel.»

Magnussen now leads the F1 grid with the most penalty points this season and faces the risk of a full race ban. The penalty point system is in place to control driver behaviour, and any points will not expire until 12 months after they were awarded.

If a driver receives 12 penalty points on their licence they will face a race ban and will not be allowed to compete in the following grand prix. No driver has faced a race ban under the current penalty point system, which was introduced in 2014.

George Russell, the director of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association, has since shared the positive impact of a race ban, and added that he did not think the penalty system needed changing. The Mercedes driver said: «If you look over the last 20 years I don’t know how many drivers have been given a race ban. I can only think of one there’s been in 20 years. In a football game people get red cards quite regularly.

«You can look at it saying there’d be an opportunity for a young driver to show what they are capable of if a driver is deserving of a race ban. Maybe a race ban is a bit harsh but things shouldn’t go unpunished.»

Alongside the licence points, there is a range of penalties that can be handed out, depending on the severity of the driver or team’s actions.

F1 drivers who received a race ban

Romain Grosjean — 2012 Belgian Grand Prix

Romain Grosjean, Lotus E20 is launched over the top of Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F2012

Romain Grosjean, Lotus E20 is launched over the top of Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F2012

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Romain Grosjean was handed a one-race ban and fined €50,000 for causing a crash at the start of the 2012 Belgian GP. The Lotus driver had an incident-packed season with seven early-race clashes in the first 12 contests, which culminated in a multi-car crash at the start of the Spa encounter.

Grosjean moved up the inside of La Source, squeezing Lewis Hamilton tightly between himself and the pitwall and onto the grass. The pair then made contact before crashing into Fernando Alonso in the Ferrari and both the Saubers of Sergio Perez and Kamui Kobayashi, the latter having started second on the grid.

Pastor Maldonado was also caught by Grosjean during the accident, which sent the Williams spinning in front of Perez, who had completely lost his rear wing. In the chaos of the crash, Grosjean went airborne over the top of Alonso’s car before coming to a stop against the outside wall.

Kobayashi and Maldonado were the only two drivers to continue after the crash, but the Sauber driver had significant damage to his car’s side.

Grosjean accepted that the race ban was his mistake but added he had not intended to squeeze Hamilton against the wall, saying: “We know that La Source is a very tough corner. It was a bit of a crazy start as well with [Pastor] Maldonado leaving [the grid early] and the Sauber [Kobayashi] smoking a lot.

«I did a mistake and I misjudged the gap with Lewis. I was sure I was in front of him. So a small mistake made a big incident. I didn’t change my line, I went from left to right. I was not really wanting to put anyone in the wall — I’m not here to stop the race in the first corner. I’m very, very sorry and I’m glad that nobody is hurt.

«But I have to say it is a very, very hard decision to hear.»

The stewards ruled that Grosjean was responsible for the multi-car crash and awarded him a one-race ban for the following week’s Italian GP. They also noted that two of the drivers eliminated in the crash were championship contenders — Alonso (first) and Hamilton (fourth).

A statement from the officials said: “The stewards regard this incident as an extremely serious breach of the regulations which had the potential to cause injury to others.”

It also noted the team had not contested the verdict, saying: «The stewards note the team conceded the action of the driver was an extremely serious mistake and an error of judgement. Neither the team nor the driver made any submission in mitigation of penalty.»

Jerome d’Ambrosio climbed behind the wheel of the Lotus for the 2012 Italian GP, following Grosjean’s ban.

Felipe Massa — 2002 Italian Grand Prix

Massa wasn't banned for Monza clash with de la Rosa, but Sauber replaced him to avoid serving a penalty

Massa wasn’t banned for Monza clash with de la Rosa, but Sauber replaced him to avoid serving a penalty

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Although technically not an official race ban, Felipe Massa was forced to miss the 2002 United States GP due to technicalities in the grid place penalty regulations. The Sauber driver was handed a 10-place grid penalty during the Italian GP for causing a collision with Pedro de la Rosa’s Jaguar.

Both drivers were forced to retire from the race before being called to the stewards to investigate the crash. They found the Brazilian responsible and handed him the 10-place grid penalty — the first of its kind to be awarded to a driver.

In 2002, the regulations stated that the penalty would be in place for ‘the next’ race and not the ‘driver’s next race’, which resulted in Sauber deciding to avoid serving the penalty by removing Massa from the US GP.

Heinz-Harald Frentzen, who had previously driven for the team between 1994-1996, was set to return to the team in 2003 but was brought in for the 2002 US GP in a bid to help the team’s constructors’ championship fight with Jaguar.

Jacques Villeneuve — 1997 Japanese Grand Prix

Villeneuve raced in Japan but was later disqualified

Villeneuve raced in Japan but was later disqualified

Photo by: Williams F1

Jacques Villeneuve’s race ban is a unique situation, after the Williams driver was still allowed to participate in the race due to the team appealing the decision from the stewards. The Canadian driver was leading the championship by nine points from Michael Schumacher at the time, with two races remaining.

Villeneuve had qualified on pole for the 1997 Japanese GP but, ahead of the race, he was disqualified from participating by the stewards. They ruled he had failed to slow his Williams at the Spoon Curve during Saturday’s practice session when passing the stranded Tyrrell of Jos Verstappen.

He was one of five drivers that had failed to slow for the yellow flags, with Schumacher, Rubens Barrichello, Johnny Herbert and Ukyo Katayama all receiving one-race bans, which were suspended until the end of the season. Villeneuve had already previously committed the same offence on three other occasions and, with a suspended ban already looming over the Williams driver, he was given an immediate ban for the next race (which was the Japanese GP as it had not taken place).

Williams lodged an appeal against the stewards’ decision to ban Villeneuve from the race and, with no time to assemble a hearing, he was allowed to take part from his pole position. During the race he was able to finish fifth, which awarded him two points — however, Williams decided to withdraw its appeal so the race ban was upheld and he was disqualified from the result.

Michael Schumacher — 1994 Italian and Portuguese grands prix

Schumacher was later banned for failing to serve penalty for overtaking on the green-flag lap

Schumacher was later banned for failing to serve penalty for overtaking on the green-flag lap

Photo by: LAT Photographic

Michael Schumacher was awarded a two-race ban in 1994, missing both the Italian and Portuguese grands prix. The German driver received a penalty for overtaking Damon Hill on the formation lap of the British GP and then repeated the violation following an aborted start.

Under the 1994 regulations, the first offence should have resulted in Schumacher being ordered to start from the back of the grid but the British GP officials were unaware of these rules. On lap 13 he was given a penalty but there was initial confusion as it was announced he was penalised five seconds and Benetton did not call him in to pit as there was no mention it was a stop/go penalty.

Again under 1994 regulations, any time penalty given before the final 12 laps of the race must have been served in the pitlane. After seven laps had passed, Schumacher was shown the black flag, which indicated that he must return to the pits. He ignored the black flag, claiming he could only see his number being displayed but not the flag itself.

Benetton decided to appeal the verdict, which meant a hearing did not take place until after the Belgian GP, which Schumacher was also disqualified from. His car was found to have “illegal wear” on the skid block, which Benetton protested was due to him spinning over a kerb.

However, this was rejected by the FIA as it was claimed there was a pattern of wear and damage to the block. Following the race, Schumacher’s two-race ban was upheld by the FIA and he was forced to miss the Italian and Portuguese events.

Mika Hakkinen — 1994 British Grand Prix

Hakkinen (whose McLaren is spinning here) was banned for his part in this Hockenheim pile-up

Hakkinen (whose McLaren is spinning here) was banned for his part in this Hockenheim pile-up

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Mika Hakkinen was given a one-race ban, suspended for three races, alongside Rubens Barrichello for a last-lap collision at the 1994 British GP. However, his ban was triggered at the start of the following race — the German GP — when the McLaren driver caused a multiple-car collision at the first corner.

Hakkinen made contact with David Coulthard’s Williams and spun across the field, taking out several cars in the process. There were 11 retirements during the first lap of the race with 10 drivers being involved in crashes before the first corner.

The Finnish driver accepted the penalty and McLaren did not appeal the FIA’s decision.

Eddie Irvine — 1994 Pacific, San Marino & Monaco Grands Prix

Irvine's Brazilian GP actions earned him a three-race ban after initial one-race penalty was appealed

Irvine’s Brazilian GP actions earned him a three-race ban after initial one-race penalty was appealed

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Eddie Irvine initially picked up a one-race ban at the Brazilian Grand Prix for causing a four-car collision on lap 35. The Irish driver suddenly swerved to avoid Martin Brundle’s McLaren, which had suffered engine failure, and thereby forced Jos Verstappen onto the grass.

The Benetton driver lost control of his car and flew over the top of Brundle, damaging the Briton’s helmet. The Ligier of Eric Bernard was also caught up in the crash as he attempted to take avoiding action.

Irvine was given a one-race ban and fined $10,000. This was appealed by Jordan but was rejected, and he was given an extended three-race ban. The FIA hoped the decision would serve as a warning to other teams to consider appeals against the stewards’s rulings.

Irvine said the four cars had come together as a result of the stopped McLaren, as well as claiming that his battle with Ayrton Senna the following year in Japan had influenced the officials.

His seat was given to Aguri Suzuki for the Pacific GP, before Andrea de Cesaris climbed into the Jordan for both the San Marino and Monaco races.

Nigel Mansell — 1989 Portuguese Grand Prix

Mansell was already in hot water for pitlane antics before colliding with Senna

Mansell was already in hot water for pitlane antics before colliding with Senna

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Nigel Mansell was given a one-race ban after ignoring a black flag for reversing in the pitlane at the 1989 Portuguese GP. The British driver had locked up coming into the pits and chose to drive around his mechanics instead of driving through them.

Mansell claimed he had not seen the black flag or a Ferrari pitboard, as well as stating he was not able to hear radio messages over the volume of his engine during a battle with Ayrton Senna. Both drivers collided, taking them both out of the race. The FIA took the view that Mansell had been driving under a black flag and had taken out a championship contender, and awarded him a one-race ban.

Ferrari did not replace Mansell with another driver for the Spanish GP to race alongside Gerhard Berger.

Riccardo Patrese — 1978 Italian Grand Prix

Patrese was banned for his part in tragic startline pile-up

Patrese was banned for his part in tragic startline pile-up

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Riccardo Patrese was known for his aggressive racing and had angered a number of drivers at the wheel of his Arrows during the season. At the start of the 1978 Italian GP, Patrese overtook James Hunt, which resulted in the McLaren veering into the right-rear wheel of Ronnie Peterson’s Lotus.

Seven other drivers were caught up in the incident and it resulted in the Lotus flying into the barriers and catching fire. Peterson was trapped inside his car but was freed by Hunt, Clay Regazzoni and Patrick Depallier before he was more badly burnt. The Swedish driver was conscious but had suffered 27 fractures to his legs and feet. Although the injuries were not life-threatening, he died the following day from a fat embolism.

At the next race, Patrese was informed by Bernie Ecclestone that several drivers — including past or future champions Hunt, Mario Andretti, Niki Lauda, Emerson Fittipaldi and Jody Scheckter — would withdraw from the race if he was not banned. Organisers agreed to ban Patrese and, although Arrows sought the opinion of a judge, the team decided to withdraw the Italian from the race.



Source link

Does Red Bull no longer have F1’s fastest car?


The 2024 season is starting to shift towards a three-horse race between Red Bull, McLaren and Ferrari as car upgrades have appear to have whittled down the difference between the three teams to one or two tenths at best.

There is little doubt Verstappen and Red Bull are still in a plum position to see out both championships, but with more than two thirds of the championship still to run, the recent surges by Ferrari and especially McLaren have injected some much-needed life into the competitive order.

But while Norris was helped by the safety car in Miami, he and Oscar Piastri were on course to deliver a front-row for McLaren in Imola, only for Verstappen to gain a tow from Nico Hulkenberg. That little help from his friend delivered a bigger boost than the 0.074s and 0.091s gaps to the McLarens.

With how difficult it proved to pass at Imola, perhaps the roles of the hunter and hunted would have been reversed, and Norris’ late pace in the race showed Red Bull is now truly under pressure.

But does that mean Red Bull has fully been caught? Its free practice struggles in Imola were well documented, and Norris’ late comeback was as much down to his exquisite driving and clever tyre management as it was about Verstappen’s hard tyres dropping in temperature.

«I think for the first 40 laps we were in a really good window and he would’ve managed the gap,» Red Bull team boss Christian Horner thought.

«After he came out the gap dropped to six seconds, but he was able to hold it there. But Lando, whatever window they managed to get their tyres into, suddenly their car came alive and it just showed how sensitive these tyres are to the different conditions.»

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

«The recovery from Friday to Saturday was very strong and what we managed to achieve on the medium tyre was very strong. I think we need to look at why were we weak in the second half of the stint, because it was only the second half on the hard tyre compared to Lando.»

The caveats accompanying the results in Miami and Imola suggest that it would be wise to wait — beyond outlier Monaco — for Montreal and especially F1’s well-known Barcelona proving ground to draw proper conclusions on whether McLaren has truly caught let alone surpassed Red Bull in pure speed.

F1 is no longer just a battle of who has the fastest car

But what’s clear is that, with Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc also just seven seconds behind, the margins are now so fine that Verstappen and Red Bull can no longer cruise to wins or brute force their way out of issues elsewhere by virtue of having a superior car.

Driver performance, car set-up, strategy, sim work, race starts, pitstops, and tyre management are now all coming into play as potentially bigger differentiators than just the innate speed of the cars themselves.

«The execution of the weekend is always a key factor, but when margins are so close, then clearly operations, the way you drive the tyres and the way you execute the race can become the dominant factor,» McLaren team principal Stella Andrea explained.

«Between a McLaren and a Red Bull, there wasn’t much to pick and there were other factors that made the difference.

«Being in the dirty air seemed to be a big factor, so having pole position, being ahead in the first corner, allowed you to manage the tyres in a certain way and manage your own pace.»

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

Vasseur believes the battle between 2024’s three top teams will be fought «everywhere» from now on.

«It’s good news for me, good news for F1, good news for the championship,» he said. «You have three teams in seven seconds after seventy laps. It’s less than one tenth a lap.

«The competition will be everywhere. The set-up of the car will be crucial, the performance of the driver will be crucial.»

That is not to say teams still aren’t flat out to fast-track upgrades to the circuit, but it appears they are hitting diminishing returns as the regulations enter their third year.

At the top of the leaderboard, the development path is becoming an «asymptote», as Vasseur always likes describing it. A curve that will never fully hit zero, but slowly starts flattening out over time.

«We are now chasing the last hundredths,» said Vasseur. «It’s not anymore a five-tenth upgrade.

«It means that you also have to be sure that what you are bringing is working. It will be the key factor for the next couple of events.»

This is exactly the scenario that Red Bull warned about when it was enjoying its unprecedented dominance in 2023, winning all but one race as it seemed like the Milton Keynes-based squad would remain unchallenged until 2025.

Even earlier this year, it looked like Red Bull had done enough to keep rivals at arm’s length with its boldly different RB20.

Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20, Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20, Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

But while Horner’s words of caution were with met with varying degrees of disbelief, that scenario might actually play out sooner than most observers expected.

«You cannot take anything for granted and we certainly don’t,» he pointed out.

«We’ve won five out of seven races, two out of two sprint races and seven out of seven poles, but the margins are fine, very fine, and in year three of these rules there is always going to be convergence.

«We are seeing exactly that. The look of the cars is converging, the performance is converging and you can see more races like Imola with fine margins.»

So while Red Bull still looks the favourite to bring it home, leading Ferrari by 56 points and McLaren by 114, the increased pressure it is under has become a source of motivation and fighting talk at Ferrari and McLaren.

«It’s not very often that you have six or potentially eight cars which could win a race,» Vasseur concluded.

«It means that when you are not in a good shape, you can move from P1 to P8 and you are scoring almost zero.

«It means that the championship can change after one or two weekends. Imagine that you have a crash, a DNF, it’s a game changer in terms of championship.

«If one team is doing a 1-2 and the other one has a DNF, then McLaren can come back or we can come back on Red Bull.»

Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20, Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20, Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images



Source link

Aston Martin F1 upgrades may have made car «difficult to drive»


Aston’s major Imola update, which included a floor redesign, a front wing and diffuser, was shaken down by Fernando Alonso in FP1 before Lance Stroll also received the parts from FP2 onwards.

However, on a weekend where rival teams also wheeled out new parts or further dialled in those from Miami, Aston’s upgrades may have delivered absolute performance but not relative competitiveness.

Alonso’s weekend was derailed by a crash at Rivazza in FP3 and, following intensive repairs by the Silverstone squad, the Spaniard just about made it to the start of qualifying.

But another Q1 off at Tamburello led to Alonso being called into the box with further issues, ending the session in 18th place. With overtaking difficult, his race became a glorified test outside points contention as the team opted to make set-up changes and start from the pitlane.

Stroll didn’t fare that much better by qualifying 13th, although he did get two points on the board by moving up to ninth.

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

According to Krack, Alonso’s off-track excursions showed that its AMR24 is «difficult to drive» at the moment despite being slightly quicker after the upgrades.

«In Imola, when you start from where we started, it’s difficult,» Krack said after the race. «We come away with two points, I think it was quite a good outcome, it shows that the car is still capable of doing things.

«But we have also seen that it is difficult to drive. We had a couple of offs over the weekend. The one from yesterday was actually impacting us the most because we were really on the back foot from that point onwards.

«We wanted to learn more, that’s why we elected to start from the pitlane and make a change on the car to see if we can make it easier. We wanted to do better from what we have done. But it was also compromised a little bit by the [Saturday’s] events.»

After qualifying, Stroll pointed out that the Imola upgrade package, which was described as being part of an «aggressive» programme by technical director Dan Fallows, was simply not enough to keep pace with its direct rivals.

Aston is in danger of falling further behind the top four while also seeing RB making strides since Miami.

But while Krack was careful not to jump to conclusions after Imola, suggesting the picture could look different in Monaco and again in Montreal, he acknowledged the AMR24 needs more firepower soon.

«We’re not happy with two points, that is clear,» he added. «But other people are also bringing upgrades, so it is always a relative game.

«It’s tough, we must not underestimate that. I think, except one team, everybody has a list full of upgrades, so it shows how competitive the whole field is.

«We have to really keep pushing and bringing more stuff.»

Additional reporting by Jonathan Noble



Source link

Tearful Vettel ‘finishing Senna’s job’ with Austrian flag tribute at F1 Imola


This month marked the 30-year anniversary of Senna’s fatal accident at Imola on 1 May 1994, which came the day after Austrian Ratzenberger lost his life in a crash.

The death of Ratzenberger, which itself followed a serious practice accident for Senna’s compatriot Rubens Barrichello, shook the Williams driver to the core at the time.

In the wreckage of Senna’s crashed car, marshals found an unfurled Austrian flag that he intended to wave on the cool-down lap as a tribute to the Simtek driver.

With the blessing of the Senna family, four-time world champion Vettel organised an elaborate tribute to both Senna and Ratzenberger, which included a demo run in the Brazilian’s 1993 McLaren MP4/8, which Vettel owns.

Waving both the Brazilian and Austrian flags during the run, Vettel said it was a way to «finish the job» that Senna had in mind.

«Obviously, the Brazilian flag was clear, because it was something that he used to do after the races,» Vettel explained.

«But I know the same story [about the Austrian flag Senna had prepared]. I was thinking about it, whether it’s the right thing to try and finish the job.

«I don’t think it will ever be finished, it’s not about finishing, but trying to just make people remember.

«It felt very special when I got the flag out and very special when I got both of them out. It was a very special and very meaningful weekend for me.»

Sebastian Vettel drives Ayrton Senna's McLaren MP4/8

Sebastian Vettel drives Ayrton Senna’s McLaren MP4/8

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Vettel, who retired from F1 at the end of 2022 after a 15-year stint with BMW, Toro Rosso, Red Bull, Ferrari and Aston Martin, said his tribute run provoked «one of the strongest emotions» ever in his career.

Asked if the demo, which was greeted enthusiastically by the Italian tifosi, left him teary-eyed, Vettel replied: «Yeah, definitely.

«It’s difficult to put in words, I think it was one of the strongest emotions I felt behind the wheel despite being alone on track and not even racing.

«Incredible. When I got the flags out, the people… it was so powerful. 

«I’m happy that I had the courage to address my idea and invite the Senna family. And I only got positive feedback.

«The compassion he had, the courage he had to speak his mind. Pushing education, trying to fight poverty in his country.

«In many ways, he was ahead of the game as a person of that time, but also as a racing driver in particular.

«And therefore it’s a very important and powerful story to share, especially with young drivers coming up.»



Source link

Ferrari power strategy cost shot at better F1 Imola GP result


The Italian squad had impressed in Friday practice but, in its preparations for qualifying, the team appeared to lack pace at the start of the lap relative to the cars ahead of it in the battle for pole position.

GPS traces show that his Ferrari was between 3-4kph slower on the straights compared to the two McLarens, and even more in arrears compared to polesitter Max Verstappen — thanks to the tow the Red Bull driver picked up from Nico Hulkenberg.

Leclerc felt that Ferrari’s ultimate grid positions, which became third and fourth when Oscar Piastri was given a three-place grid drop for impeding Kevin Magnussen in FP1, cost a shot at anything more than third.

«Looking back at yesterday, reanalysing qualifying. I think we basically lost everything at the launch [of the lap] for some reason,» he said.

«We had a slightly different power strategy compared to McLaren and Red Bull, and we lost everything on the run down to Turn 2 — Max, on top of that, had the slipstream.

«This is something we’ll have to look into because, especially on a track like this, track position is absolutely everything.

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24, Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24, Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

«When you only have a tenth in between Red Bull, McLaren, and ourselves, we need to do everything perfect and the third place today cost us maybe a better result in the race.»

Explaining his first impressions of Ferrari’s comprehensive suite of upgrades for the Imola race, Leclerc contended that it was difficult to judge them given the demands of the Imola circuit.

But he was confident that the team had attained its objectives with the new bodywork, floor, and wings that it had installed for its home race.

Read Also:

«I think first of all, it’s not the best track to judge upgrades, mostly because kerb-riding is such a thing here that if you have a good car on kerbs, then that could hide a bit more what is the real order,» the Monegasque said.

«The good thing is that everything we expected from those upgrades, we had it in terms of data. It did exactly what it was supposed to do, which is always a good thing.»

Watch: F1 2024 Emilia Romagna GP Review — Too Late for McLaren’s Charge on Red Bull



Source link