Метка: Formula-1

Schumacher’s first F1 engineer Trevor Foster


In his lengthy motorsport career which has spanned “so many eras”, Trevor Foster has filled almost every conceivable role in racing organisations. Working his way through the ranks from a humble mechanic to becoming a race engineer, he has taken the plunge of running his own single-seater outfit, been a team manager, managing director of a plucky sportscar underdog responsible for engine/chassis development and even dabbled as a driver manager to future DTM ace Jamie Green during his rise up the single-seater ladder.

Two spells in Formula 1 with Jordan, stints at Shadow, Tyrrell and Lotus, along with success at Le Mans, in Formula Ford and historics means there is little that Foster has not encountered. Yet even at the age of 72, concentrating on his Pegasus Classic Engineering venture that he began upon departing United Autosports at the end of 2021, Foster remains conscious of areas for improvement.

“Even after the number of years you’ve been in it, you have to come to work with a view that ‘I don’t know everything, I’m still learning’ and I explain that to my guys,” he reflects. “You have to be willing to learn and be open. You can’t be too fixed on your ideas.”

It was motorcycle racing that first captured Foster’s interest in motorsport. Born in Leicester, he indulged in spectating at his local Mallory Park circuit before cutting his teeth working on John Whale’s racing Minis as an apprentice while working at a local garage.

“The racing fraternity was minuscule in those days, 1969-70, compared to what it is now as regards the size of the teams and the number of job opportunities,” reflects Foster. “There’s much bigger opportunities in certain respects than when I started.”

After a spell with Bob Gerard’s outfit came an opportunity to work for Tom Wheatcroft, whose rising star Roger Williamson appeared on the cusp of great things in grand prix racing. But the allegiance was tragically cut short when Williamson was trapped in his flaming March following a crash at Zandvoort in 1973. Woefully ill-equipped marshals did not join David Purley in his valiant efforts to save him.

Foster subsequently joined Shadow in F1 and credits its chief mechanic Peter Kerr with giving him his best pieces of advice. Kerr, a Kiwi who had previously worked at March, drilled into him the importance of critically diagnosing problems rather than shrugging them off as ‘just one of those things’. Even if he lacked the expertise to effect repairs, “I just wanted to understand,” so that future instances could be avoided.

Foster experienced nearly every role in a racing team during his formative years

Foster experienced nearly every role in a racing team during his formative years

Photo by: Andre Vor / Sutton Images

Foster also learned from Kerr an important mantra: “The more attention, the more detail you put into your car preparation, then the better chance you have of success. I’ve often referred to that as I’ve gone through my career.”

The environment in which Foster started out was a world away from the sophistication of today. Not only were period DFV-powered F1 cars “quite simplistic to run” compared with their hybrid-powered ground effect modern counterparts, but component analysis and team infrastructure were nowhere near as developed, with very few sensors to work from. Mechanics had to be accomplished across multiple areas of the car. “You did your gearbox, rebuilt your uprights, you knew every inch of the car,” reflects Foster.

After trading Shadow for Tyrrell and then March’s works F2 squad, starting his own operation was the product of happy coincidence rather than the culmination of an ambition for Foster. He had even stepped back from racing and accepted a job at leading historic Ferrari specialists Graypaul Motors, which counted JCB’s Anthony Bamford as a prominent customer.

«I applied the same sort of disciplines that I’d always done and been taught to do. We won quite a lot of Formula Ford races and championships in the first year» Trevor Foster

“I’d only been there a few months,” says Foster, before he was assigned to head up the build of a fleet of three 246 F1 car replicas for Bamford, subsequently raced by Willie Green and Stirling Moss. The project involved stripping down an original example of F1’s last front-engined race winner and manufacturing parts. Now he had a taste for the bug again, it was difficult to turn down an approach from knitwear magnate Brian De ZiIle to start a team to run his son Graham. Thus, Pegasus Motorsport was born.

“I applied the same sort of disciplines that I’d always done and been taught to do,” Foster says. “We won quite a lot of Formula Ford races and championships in the first year.”

He humbly neglects to mention that among the races in question during that glittering 1983 campaign was the prestigious Formula Ford Festival, captured by Andrew Gilbert-Scott in a Reynard. Gilbert-Scott also won the Townsend Thoresen and RAC championships for FF1600, while de Zille secured the BP Superfind Junior title.

The graduation to Formula Ford 2000 for 1984 was not as strong for Pegasus, despite the undoubted driving talents of Mauricio Gugelmin. Foster believes this was “because we started off with a Van Diemen and had to switch chassis”. Undeterred, he again progressed for 1985 into British F3 and Pegasus won three times with a Ralt driven by the late Gerrit Van Kouwen.

Obituary: Formula Ford Festival and British F3 winner Gerrit van Kouwen dies aged 60

Foster's Pegasus Motorsport squad found almost instant success by winning the 1983 Formula Ford Festival with Gilbert-Scott

Foster’s Pegasus Motorsport squad found almost instant success by winning the 1983 Formula Ford Festival with Gilbert-Scott

Photo by: Motorsport Images

“A fundamental disagreement with my other business partners” prompted Foster to step away during 1986 and join the Tim Stakes-run Swallow Racing team that was “15 minutes from my house”. But giving up team ownership wasn’t a great hardship, Foster concedes. He learned following a disheartening sponsorship rejection by the local Bostik adhesive company, which he had believed would be a sure thing, that continually chasing deals wasn’t for him. It came as a relief to be able to focus fully on engineering.

“I don’t think I’ve ever been so deflated as coming away from that [Bostik pitch],” admits Foster. “I realised I hadn’t got that ability to keep going back to try another sponsor. I took it too personally. It convinced me that I was right to walk away from that side of the business.”

One team owner whose zeal for a deal could not be faulted was the “absolutely tireless” Eddie Jordan. That he successfully lured Foster from Swallow for the 1988 Formula 3000 season owed much to the engineer’s admiration for Johnny Herbert.

This dated back the 1985 Festival, when a spectating Foster had been dazzled by the victorious driver aboard an unfancied Quest, and Herbert captured the 1987 British F3 title with Eddie Jordan Racing before stepping up to F3000 with Reynard. The combination proved a hit, winning first time out at Jerez, and Foster is convinced it would have yielded the title without Herbert’s terrifying accident at Brands Hatch which could have curtailed his career as well as his season.

Foster remained with EJR for its graduation to F1 in 1991, combining team manager duties with race engineering. Gary Anderson’s sleek 191 design is regarded as one of F1’s most attractive cars, but for the engineer, the highlight of the year came during Jordan’s brief tenure running rookie Schumacher. His affiliation with the future seven-time world champion, brought in as the incarcerated Bertrand Gachot’s replacement, is one that Foster feels “very proud and at the same time, very privileged” to have had.

Yet Foster recalls that before his debut at Spa, there was not widespread conviction that the Mercedes Group C ace would take instantly to grand prix racing. One unnamed individual went as far as to inform Eddie Jordan of his view that he should instead have signed Heinz-Harald Frentzen, who had proven erratic for EJR during the 1990 F3000 season. But Foster, who had paid a few visits to Japan with Martin Donnelly in 1989 when subcontracted to the Kygnus Reynard team, says Schumacher’s impressive Japanese Formula 3000 cameo at Sugo in 1991 when he finished second in a Team Le Mans Reynard was the clincher.

“I knew how difficult it was for a European driver to go there and perform,” explains Foster. “That sold him to me. We had a conversation between myself, Gary and Eddie. Gary and I were very positive about Michael and that’s how the deal swung.”

Schumacher's F1 debut with Jordan left an impression on Foster

Schumacher’s F1 debut with Jordan left an impression on Foster

Photo by: Sutton Images

Foster recalls being struck by Schumacher’s immediate confidence to push the car on his first run at Silverstone’s south circuit – “within three laps, you were thinking ‘he’s driven this car all his life’” – and his calmness in the car extended to debriefs. “The information he gave you as an engineer was phenomenal, because he wasn’t just asking you to fix every problem,” adds Foster. Although Schumacher was poached by Benetton for the next race at Monza, Foster admits the experience of working with the German left an impression on him.

Foster remained with Jordan until 1993. Recognising that he was overburdened and could no longer fulfil engineering duties to his personal satisfaction alongside team management, his switch to Team Lotus as director of racing – to reunite with Herbert – allowed him to focus purely on one role. For Foster, it was important to honour his word having committed to relocating and working for the storied Hethel squad even after Jordan belatedly agreed to acquiesce.

But it wasn’t long before Foster was on the move again. “I just couldn’t see how it could sustain itself long term,” he says of what proved to be a terminal decline in fortunes for Lotus. Foster trusted his gut and departed in March 1994, which proved the team’s last year in F1.

«At Jordan, we wanted to be punching above our weight. For the budget we generated as a little privateer team, we were doing a very good job» Trevor Foster

Foster ultimately rejoined Jordan later in the decade and as managing director was at the heart of a valiant effort to take on McLaren and Ferrari in 1999. Frentzen won twice, but ultimately tailed off in the closing stages and finished third in the standings behind Mika Hakkinen and Eddie Irvine, another driver engineered by Foster in F3000. Frentzen was “a bit more of a complex character than Michael”, Foster remembers, his performances prone to fluctuating.

“You had to give him the car that he could drive and if you gave him that, he could do the job,” considers Foster, a hint of frustration in his voice. “He had one style of driving, and you had to adapt to his way of doing it. If that happened to suit the circuit and the car to be quick on that day, absolutely fine. But if it wasn’t, then results were harder to come by.”

Jordan would never again scale such highs and Foster departed in 2002, but after seeing out a 12-month contract at BAR there would be no more moves within F1. He vividly remembers feeling “almost aghast” following a meeting with Jaguar by an expression of contentment at its mid-grid efforts being on par with its given budget.

“I thought, ‘maybe that sums up the philosophy,’” says Foster. “At Jordan, we wanted to be punching above our weight. For the budget we generated as a little privateer team, we were doing a very good job.”

A switch to Zytek produced instant results but company focus didn't match Foster's vision

A switch to Zytek produced instant results but company focus didn’t match Foster’s vision

Photo by: Andre Vor / Sutton Images

Instead, he became managing director of Zytek Racing, tasked with overseeing development of its adapted Reynard chassis and in-house engine. Giant-killing victories with its works-run 04S at Spa and Nurburgring against Audi and Pescarolo in the 2005 Le Mans Endurance Series, and in the American Le Mans Series finale at Laguna Seca, gave Foster “a good sense of achievement”. But he recognised that Zytek boss Bill Gibson’s priority was to demonstrate the quality of his engine for use in one-make series rather than ramping up construction of customer cars.

“I don’t think he ever saw himself as a major chassis manufacturer,” says Foster. “At that time, it was a means to display his engine. We never really went up to the next level.”

A desire to secure orders for a new car before committing to building one proved flawed. Although Zytek had plenty of joy from continual tinkering, its Z11SN winning the LMP2 class at Le Mans in 2011 (Greaves) and 2014 (Jota), Gibson would not budge from a plan that ultimately yielded significant success as his company (now renamed after its founder) has been the sole LMP2 engine supplier since 2017.

“I felt I needed to do more,” says Foster, who via a spell running Fortec’s Mercedes GT3 team landed at United Autosports as Richard Dean and Zak Brown’s squad eyed a graduation from LMP3 to LMP2 for the 2017 European Le Mans Series. The collaboration proved immediately successful, winning on debut at Silverstone despite – rather than because of – its choice of chassis.

The Ligier JS P217 quickly proved inferior to the ORECA 07, which is today the only real choice for a team wanting to go racing in LMP2. But by the time it had switched between the French brands in 2019, United had uncovered a level of detail that allowed it to hit the ground running upon entering the World Endurance Championship for the pandemic-afflicted 2019-20 campaign. A run of four straight victories that included the 2020 Le Mans 24 Hours netted the WEC P2 title at the first time of asking, while its first full year running the ORECA in the ELMS netted first and second in points.

“The Ligier was not the easiest of cars to work with, but even on difficult cars you learn things,” he says. “And because of all the stuff we did to try and make the Ligier competitive, in the tiny details, when we then got the ORECA which is a very good car in its standard form and were able to apply what we’d learned on the Ligier, it paid dividends and we got results.”

Foster enjoyed working with the engineering group led by Dave Greenwood and Gary Robertshaw, but the regular commuting between Loughborough and the team’s Wakefield HQ amounted to 700 miles a week.

The 2020 Le Mans 24 Hours LMP2 victory capped Foster's time at United Autosports

The 2020 Le Mans 24 Hours LMP2 victory capped Foster’s time at United Autosports

Photo by: JEP / Motorsport Images

“At the end of ’21 with United, I felt I’d achieved everything I wanted to do,” he says. “It was coming up to 50 years in motorsports since my first professional role and I thought ‘maybe now’s the time’. My role had changed because the organisation had got so much bigger, I was doing less with the actual engineering on the cars and more to do with the organisation side, which wasn’t as fulfilling.”

At the end of his contract, he departed and went about reviving the Pegasus name in historic motorsport. “I’d met several people over the years who’d said to me, ‘Look, I’ve got some classic cars and would really love you to work on our cars if you ever do decide to do your own thing’,” says Foster.

PCE is a project driven by enjoyment. “I don’t want to build an empire,” he says. The intent is rather to manage spectacular cars – with a Lola T70 and Chevron B16 among its stable – for a select number of customers and go racing in a non-pressured environment, working with drivers of varying experience levels has proven to be a learning curve.

The new pursuit has already given Foster some considerable highs. His most prized memory so far came at the Paul Ricard 2 Tours D’Horloge 24-hour race last year, taking victory with a Tiga SC 83 Sports 2000 chassis

“Although the attention to detail is still there and you’re trying to extract performance from cars, I had to acknowledge that the format had changed slightly,” he says. “While some of our drivers are extremely competitive, if one driver gets out of the car at the end of the weekend and says, ‘I really enjoyed that, car ran well’ and they finished 10th, that’s fantastic.

“Some drivers just want to enjoy it. They don’t want to be dragged over or a data system for an hour and a half. Also, you’ve got to be very mindful not to push people into an area of driving they’re uncomfortable with.”

The new pursuit has already given Foster some considerable highs. His most prized memory so far came at the Paul Ricard 2 Tours D’Horloge 24-hour race last year, taking victory with a Tiga SC 83 Sports 2000 chassis.

“You’re taking a car that was designed in the mid-eighties for doing 30-minute races at a club level and taking it to a 24-hour race, there’s so many things that can go wrong,” he says proudly. “You can’t redesign the thing, and to run with just basically fuel, tyres and anything else to keep it going, it’s not an easy thing to do.”

Foster is putting his 50 years of engineering knowhow into his Pegasus organisation

Foster is putting his 50 years of engineering knowhow into his Pegasus organisation

But historic racing to Foster isn’t purely an opportunity to indulge in nostalgia. He recognises that as a discipline it has benefits for younger generations too, as it grants opportunities “to understand fundamentally how to diagnose a problem with a car”. These, he observes, are profoundly lacking in bigger organisations where roles are far more prescribed.

“If a historic car comes in with a misfire, you can’t just plug a laptop in and it comes up and says ‘error code 37, change the distributor pick-up,’” he reasons. “You’ve got to do your own self-diagnosis of what the problems are. You need a far more analytical brain in a lot of the stuff we do, because you don’t have the resource and the infrastructure.”

With working in a smaller operation comes responsibility too. Foster adds: “There’s not 50 people in the chain, or 20 people or 10. You’re having to make the decision as to whether this part gets changed, or it doesn’t get changed. It’s a very different situation generally. If you want to understand how a racing car works, historic racing isn’t a bad format to go through.”

Advice for engineers from Trevor Foster

  • Very few people are involved in understanding the whole package and do everything. But that shouldn’t stop you trying to understand why something has stopped working. You don’t learn as much by saying ‘buy me a new one’.
  • Sometimes there’s a lot of smoke and mirrors, which you have to dissect yourself and dismiss. I’m quite a logical person in my own mind and it helps when you’re working through problems to do so logically.
  • In anything I’ve done, even if you win from pole position and have fastest lap, you should still come away thinking, ‘What could we have done better?’ It’s important to keep questioning and not think ‘We did those three things, so everything was perfect’. It never is!
Foster believes historic racing is an ideal way to get a full understanding of how to engineer a racing car

Foster believes historic racing is an ideal way to get a full understanding of how to engineer a racing car



Source link

Aston Martin uncovers trigger for Stroll and Alonso’s Brazilian GP struggles


Aston Martin has got to the bottom of its troubled Brazilian Grand Prix that left Lance Stroll out on the formation lap and Fernando Alonso battling extreme bouncing.

The Silverstone-based team endured a hugely challenging race afternoon at Interlagos as Stroll spun into the wall on the formation lap after his rears unexpectedly locked, before he managed to beach himself in the gravel.

Then Alonso struggled throughout with similar rear locking issues plus excessive porpoising that left him struggling with back pain at the end, but he was determined to push on and see the chequered flag.

Speaking on the team radio at the time, Alonso, who finished 14th, admitted that something unusual was happening. “This bouncing is not normal,” he said.

With no immediate explanation for what happened on both cars, Aston Martin has spent some time since returning to its factory trying to get a better comprehension of the factors at play.

It now suspects that the problems on both cars were triggered by a super nervous rear-end characteristic that had been introduced as a result of car changes made following the qualifying crashes the team suffered on Sunday morning.

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin AMR24

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin AMR24

Photo by: Lubomir Asenov / Motorsport Images

Both Stroll and Alonso had hit the barriers in the wet qualifying session, damaging the Suzuka-concept specification floors the team had intended to run for the Interlagos event.

With no spares of that specification available, Aston Martin had to revert to a previous floor version – which was the one it first introduced at the Hungarian GP.

Normally teams cannot change specs between qualifying and the race, as that is a breach of parc ferme regulations and mandates a pit lane start.

However, things are different on a sprint race weekend when allowances are made if there is a shortage of spare parts.

Article 40.4 says at sprint weekends teams can change specification if they can “demonstrate there is a shortage of parts, and provided that the replacement part is of a specification that has been previously used in a qualifying session or a race».

It was this rule that Mercedes used at the United States GP to allow George Russell to go back to an older specification of floor following his qualifying crash.

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24, gets beached in the gravel prior to the start

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24, gets beached in the gravel prior to the start

Photo by: Andrew Ferraro / Motorsport Images

The complication for Aston Martin, however, was that the change of floor had to be made without it being able to alter the mechanical set-up around it – as suspension settings are totally fixed in parc ferme.

So on a weekend where teams were battling the problems of excessive bumps on the Interlagos track, plus tricky weather conditions, the end result was a car whose aero platform and mechanical settings did not match up.

Speaking about what Aston Martin has found out since Brazil, team principal Mike Krack thinks a combination of elements came together to leave both its drivers with a car that was ultra nervous.

“It was clear that both drivers were battling a car that was incredibly difficult to drive during Sunday’s race,» he said. «Our post-weekend analysis has highlighted several factors that explain this.

“Following both car’s accidents in qualifying, we had to replace a lot of components with a different specification due to availabilities at the end of a triple header. This is allowed by the Sprint Event regulations, and you declare your shortages and replacement options to the FIA before the event.

“[But] you aren’t allowed to change the mechanical set-up of the cars. This meant we could neither check nor adjust the set-up of the cars which negatively affected aerodynamic behaviour and performance.

Mike Krack, Team Principal, Aston Martin F1 Team

Mike Krack, Team Principal, Aston Martin F1 Team

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

“Add in treacherous wet conditions, along with an incredibly bumpy track, and you begin to understand that both drivers had the odds stacked against them.

“Both cars were highly susceptible to wheel locking, and we can see in the data that this is what caused the issues for both Lance and Fernando.»

Aston Martin has been experimenting with its floor choices in recent races, with an upgrade it delivered for Austin not delivering the step forward hoped for.

It reverted to the Suzuka spec from Mexico, and may commit to the Budapest version for the next high-speed races in Las Vegas and Qatar.

Read Also:



Source link

Who has won an F1 grand prix from the furthest back on the grid?


The 2024 Brazilian Grand Prix witnessed Max Verstappen deliver a champion-like performance that put him on the cusp of a fourth consecutive Formula 1 world title. 

Verstappen won from 17th as a disastrous qualifying saw him finish 12th, before an engine change penalty dropped him five places. 

But the Red Bull driver delivered a masterclass in the wet to extend his lead over second-placed Lando Norris to 62 points with 86 left available. 

Nobody has won a grand prix from so far back since the 2005 Japanese GP, so where does Verstappen’s win stand in the history books?

22nd — John Watson, 1983 United States Grand Prix West

John Watson, McLaren MP4-1C Ford

John Watson, McLaren MP4-1C Ford

Photo by: Rainer W. Schlegelmilch / Motorsport Images

John Watson holds F1’s record for winning a grand prix from the furthest back on the grid, having started 22nd at the 1983 United States GP West.

It was the second round of the season and anger had already kicked off pre-qualifying as teams and drivers were unhappy at the slightly modified Long Beach circuit, which had bumps in the parts that connected the old and new layout. 

Teams were therefore concerned about their suspensions but the problems went deeper for Watson, who struggled with his Michelin tyres in qualifying. He wasn’t the only big name to suffer a poor session though, as team-mate Niki Lauda lined up one place behind.

But with a full load of fuel onboard, both McLaren cars were able to quickly generate heat into their tyres and after Lauda overtook Watson at race start, the pair progressed through the field in tandem as their pace was unstoppable. 

By lap 28, they were third and fourth before Watson overtook Lauda at the end of Shoreline Drive. At this point, the Northern Irishman was 20 seconds off the front which saw a thrilling battle between leader Jacques Laffite and Riccardo Patrese.

However, Patrese slid off as he attempted an overtake, allowing the McLarens through before Watson and Lauda quickly moved past Laffite, who had problems with his tyres.

So McLaren was now remarkably 1-2 and as Lauda struggled with leg cramp in the closing stages, he failed to challenge Watson who claimed a sensational victory that was the fifth and final win of his F1 career — which Autosport also listed as his greatest race.

19th — Bill Vukovich,1954 Indianapolis 500 

Bill Vukovich, Kurtis-Kraft

Bill Vukovich, Kurtis-Kraft

Photo by: Indianapolis Motor Speedway

Though not technically classified as a grand prix, the Indianapolis 500 was still part of the F1 calendar from 1950 to 1960. The 1954 edition saw reigning winner Bill Vukovich start 19th having struggled in qualifying with his now two-year-old car.

His rise up the order was not as rapid as Watson’s in Long Beach either, as Vukovich first took the lead on lap 61 before very quickly losing it by pitting. But he worked his way through the pack again before reclaiming first on lap 92 until dropping back once more through the pits. 

Yet the two-time Indy 500 winner finally took the lead for good on lap 150, before setting a then-record of a 130.84mph average race speed. But Vukovich tragically died at the Indy 500 the following year after a four-car collision whilst he was leading on lap 57. 

Race winner Rubens Barrichello, Ferrari F1 2000

Race winner Rubens Barrichello, Ferrari F1 2000

Photo by: Motorsport Images

The headlines were often stolen by Michael Schumacher when the seven-time world champion partnered Rubens Barrichello at Ferrari, yet in 2000 the Brazilian grabbed them at his team-mate’s home race. 

That year’s German GP witnessed Barrichello suffer an electrical problem in qualifying leaving him 18th on the grid, but a great start and faultless strategy had him fighting for victory.

The Ferrari driver climbed to 10th on lap one, during which Schumacher retired after a collision with Giancarlo Fisichella, before gaining another five positions over the following five tours in his rapid F1-2000.

Barrichello continued his superior pace and began setting successive fastest laps as he eventually caught up with Pedro de la Rosa, before overtaking him for fourth on lap 12. 

On the 15th lap, the Brazilian was into the podium positions after a move on Jarno Trulli at Hockenheim’s Jim Clark chicane before becoming the first driver to pit two tours later. 

Other drivers opted to pit during the lap 25 safety car, caused by a track protestor, before switching tyres again when rain began falling on lap 35. Yet Barrichello stayed out, as he and Ferrari believed the rain was not enough to fit wet tyres despite it only getting heavier.

But Barrichello held on and eventually took the maiden victory of his F1 career to become the first Brazilian to win a grand prix since Ayrton Senna at Adelaide in 1993. 

17th — John Watson, 1982 Detroit Grand Prix

John Watson, Eddie Cheever, Didier Pironi

John Watson, Eddie Cheever, Didier Pironi

Photo by: Motorsport Images

It was only a year before his incredible win in Long Beach that Watson had produced a similarly spectacular comeback drive to victory in the United States. 

At the 1982 Detroit GP, Watson was caught out by a qualifying collision involving Chico Serra’s Fittipaldi leaving the McLaren driver 17th on the grid.

But that year Watson, who finished third in the championship, was in fine form and rapidly progressed through the field in Detroit before taking second after an incredible lap 30 where he overtook Didier Pironi, Lauda and Eddie Cheever. 

By that point, Watson was 15s behind leader Keke Rosberg but he halved the deficit within two laps and eventually overtook as that year’s world champion started to struggle with his tyres.

As Rosberg eventually fell behind Cheever and Pironi, Watson took a comfortable second and final victory of the season.

17th — Kimi Raikkonen, 2005 Japanese Grand Prix

Race winner Kimi Raikkonen, McLaren

Race winner Kimi Raikkonen, McLaren

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

The last driver to win an F1 race from 17th before Verstappen was Kimi Raikkonen at the 2005 Japanese GP. 

After the early dominance of Fernando Alonso and Renault that year, McLaren came strong towards the end having won five straight heading into the Japan penultimate round.

The run looked in doubt though when McLaren suffered a disastrous one-shot qualifying session that only became wetter as time went on, resulting in the British squad coming 17th and 18th.

In fact, Raikkonen and team-mate Juan Pablo Montoya weren’t the only front-runners to qualify towards the back, as Alonso was 16th with Schumacher in 14th.

But conditions were dry on race day at Suzuka allowing the pace of the Renault, McLaren and Ferrari to shine through, in which Raikkonen overtook the two world champions through the pits.

By lap 30, the McLaren driver was fourth but 17s behind leader Fisichella with 23 tours remaining, yet quickly cut that gap while climbing up to second as Jenson Button and Mark Webber both pitted.

With Raikkonen and Fisichella both pitting again before the end of the race, the gap was nine seconds with eight laps left, but the Renault was struggling on its tyres so the deficit only ever reduced. 

It culminated in Raikkonen taking the lead down the start-finish straight on the final lap to give McLaren its sixth, consecutive victory and the Finn’s seventh of 2005 helping him finish runner-up to Alonso in the championship. 

17th — Max Verstappen, 2024 Brazilian Grand Prix

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, 1st position, takes the chequered flag

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, 1st position, takes the chequered flag

Photo by: Lubomir Asenov / Motorsport Images

The 2024 Brazilian GP is the weekend Verstappen all-but confirmed himself as a four-time world champion. Heading into the grand prix, he was very much on the back foot as title rival Norris led a McLaren 1-2 in the sprint race while Verstappen crossed the line in third but was demoted to fourth due to a virtual safety car infringement. 

His misery was compounded in qualifying, delayed until the Sunday morning due to heavy thunderstorms in Sao Paulo, as Verstappen only finished 12th. That’s because he had to abort his final run in Q2 due to Lance Stroll crashing at Turn 3 which initially caused a yellow flag that eventually turned red, while Norris ended up on pole. 

But Verstappen has a reputation of excelling in wet conditions and he delivered on that in the grand prix, by enjoying a fantastic start where he gained seven positions across the opening two laps after finding grip where others could not. The Red Bull driver was simply on another level and he quickly picked off one car after another, Turn 1 being a popular overtaking spot, to end up sixth by lap 22.

Yet with tyres starting to wear out, and a lap 28 VSC, teams had the dilemma if to pit or not. Ahead of Verstappen, Leclerc, Norris and leader George Russell all came in for a fresh set, but that proved to be the wrong decision as Franco Colapinto’s crash on lap 32 caused a red flag.

This meant the new leader Esteban Ocon, Verstappen and Pierre Gasly, who completed the top three, could all switch tyres without a cost as they fitted new intermediates for the restart. Ocon kept his lead, but then Carlos Sainz’s crash on lap 40 caused a safety car period in which Verstappen immediately overtook the Alpine driver at the restart to eventually take his eighth victory of 2024.



Source link

How Tsunoda’s «P1» gamble was ruined by F1’s red flag rules


Yuki Tsunoda believes he would have led the Brazilian Grand Prix had the safety car and subsequent red flags not been called for at Interlagos.

The Japanese driver was one of a select few to opt for a switch to extreme wet tyres as rain pelted the Sao Paulo circuit, with he and team-mate Liam Lawson at one stage lapping faster than those around them by almost five seconds per lap.

Watch: Can Anyone Challenge Max Verstappen? Your F1 Questions Answered

But with others trying to brave it out on intermediates as the deluge got heavier, race control had no alternative other than to send the safety car out on track, a neutralisation that became a full red-flag stoppage once Franco Colapinto had crashed his Williams catching up to the pack after a pitstop.

Tsunoda, who was running third before his pitstop, lost out with F1’s rules allowing for free tyre changes under red flag conditions and would eventually finish eighth on the road – a result that was upgraded to seventh courtesy of a 10-second penalty for McLaren’s Oscar Piastri, who had earlier punted Lawson into a spin at Turn 1.

«I think what we did, switching to extreme, that was good,» explained Tsunoda.

«Just the safety car and the red flag came out, that was the point that went very down. If the red flag didn’t come out, probably I would, at some point, have overtaken a lot of cars and maybe [been] P1, but it just didn’t come towards us.»

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Yuki Tsunoda, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

Lawson also scored points as RB locks into a fight for sixth in the constructors’ standings, albeit losing ground to double podium-scoring Alpine.

Having stressed the importance of the result for the Faenza-based team, Tsunoda added: «It wasn’t easy conditions. If you lose concentration, [it can have] a lot of consequences.

«I enjoyed the last stint, good fight with Oscar [Piastri]. I tried to be within 10 seconds. You know, could have done a lot of things wrong, but kept it clean and tried to score P7, which is good.»

Read Also:



Source link

WRC champion Rovanpera tests Red Bull F1 car


Reigning two-time world rally champion Kalle Rovanpera swapped a rally car for a Red Bull RB8 Formula 1 car in a test at the Red Bull Ring.

Suggestions the 15-time WRC rally winner could drive an F1 car emerged earlier this season while a picture posted on his Instagram of a visit to the Red Bull Racing workshop in Milton Keynes last month further fanned speculation.

Read Also:

To prepare for the outing, Rovanpera visited Red Bull Racing’s headquarters for a seat fitting before taking part in a session on the team’s simulator.

«We did the seat fitting for the car to check I have everything well in the cockpit for the test and then we did a morning session on the simulator trying different smaller category formula cars building up to the bigger ones. I was able to get a hang of the track and stuff,» Rovanpera told Motorsport.com prior to the event. 

“I’m still a race driver so I want to show my potential and try to do well.»

Last week, Rovanpera headed to the Austrian Grand Prix venue, where he made his single-seater debut – first driving Formula 4 and Formula Renault 3.5 machinery, before stepping up to an older-generation Red Bull F1 car. 

Kalle Rovanpera test in a Red Bull Formula 1 car at the Red Bull Ring 

Kalle Rovanpera test in a Red Bull Formula 1 car at the Red Bull Ring 

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

The Finn completed between 40 and 50 laps at the circuit where he raced in the Porsche Carrera Cup Benelux series this year. 

“It was a great day, I got to drive three different formula cars. I got quite a few laps in and, of course, the F1 was something I had been looking forward to for a long time, so it was really cool to finally get to drive it. The day went well, and I was left with very good feelings,” said Rovanpera.

“The biggest differences between rally and F1 are obviously that a rally car moves a lot more from the body – F1 is a bit like a karting car, it doesn’t move much from its suspension, but it has an incredible amount of grip – and of course, F1 has a huge amount of downforce, which allows you to drive much faster in corners. It’s also physically quite different. 

“There’s a lot more lateral G-force, the car stops much more and turns more — it feels very different to the driver, there are a lot more G-forces and the car has an incredible amount of grip.

Kalle Rovanpera test in a Red Bull Formula 1 car at the Red Bull Ring 

Kalle Rovanpera test in a Red Bull Formula 1 car at the Red Bull Ring 

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

“Indeed, the first time you sit in there, it feels quite different than in a rally car — you also sit in such a different position that it feels quite different — but it was really cool to get to feel it today.”

This year Rovanpera has expanded his motorsport horizons by venturing into circuit racing having opted to contest a partial World Rally Championship campaign for Toyota, ahead of a return to full-time competition next year.

Rovanpera’s circuit racing exploits have included a part campaign in the Porsche Carrera Cup Benelux series, which has yielded three race wins. The Finn also contested a round of the Italian Carrera Cup series at Monza last month. 

The 24-year-old is also a regular on the drifting scene, performing all over the world, and has revealed ambitions to one day compete at the Le Mans 24 Hours World Endurance Championship event.

Kalle Rovanpera test in a Red Bull Formula 1 car at the Red Bull Ring 

Kalle Rovanpera test in a Red Bull Formula 1 car at the Red Bull Ring 

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

Rovanpera isn’t the first WRC star to pilot an F1 car, with 1995 champion Colin McRae and nine-time champion Sebastien Loeb famously enjoying outings. 

McRae piloted a 1996 Jordan F1 car at Silverstone as part of a car swap stunt that saw then-Jordan driver Martin Brundle drive McRae’s WRC Subaru Impreza. 

In 2007, Loeb drove a Renault F1 show car at the Paul Ricard Circuit before joining Red Bull at an F1 winter test in Barcelona 2008, where he set the eighth-fastest time driving a Red Bull RB4.



Source link

Did a 5mm inter tyre tread difference decide the Brazilian GP?


The rain-affected Brazilian Grand Prix delivered what was perhaps the biggest shock podium of the Formula 1 season so far.

Max Verstappen’s charge from 17th on the grid to the front had been anticipated by very few people, and it marked his first triumph since the Spanish Grand Prix back in June.

Right behind the Dutchman were the two Alpine cars of Esteban Ocon and Pierre Gasly, who scored more points for the squad in a single afternoon than they have all season so far.

The joy of the top three was in contrast to the struggles that other teams faced in the wet conditions, with recent benchmark squads McLaren and Ferrari struggling with a lack of pace.

World championship contender Lando Norris was fighting front-locking problems, while Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc described his SF-24 as pretty horrendous to drive.

«We were just not fast enough,» declared the Monegasque after the race. «The car was extremely difficult to drive and very, very pointy, very digital, very oversteery.»

While Verstappen and the two Alpines were certainly given a helping hand to their result by the red flag that handed them a free tyre change, it would be wrong to say that this was a fluke result won by a roll of the dice.

Even after the red flag resumption, the trio were the fastest cars on track, showing that the end result was certainly more down to how the relative cars performed in the wet.

It is a well-known phenomenon that some cars are more suitable for wet conditions than dry – as multiple elements come together to help drivers overcome deficiencies that are exposed in the dry.

Pierre Gasly, Alpine

Pierre Gasly, Alpine

Photo by: Alpine

One factor that almost certainly helped Alpine was the fact that the wet masked one of its main weaknesses: engine performance. With the tricky conditions more about managing throttle input than simply having the most power, the squad was on a much more level playing field than it is in the dry.

But one other interesting element popped up as a factor that could explain the shuffling of the order in the wet — and that is the aero impact of wet-weather tyres.

The current generation of ground-effect cars are very sensitive to ride height, and just a couple of millimetres of difference in ground clearance can have a pretty big impact in terms of downforce levels – with all the juicy performance coming as close to the track as possible.

So with the diameter of the inter tyre that most teams use being 5mm greater with its tread pattern than the slick (725mm compared to 720mm), there is a direct impact on where the car platform is running compared to where it sits on a slick.

And it must be remembered that teams were already finding that they could not run as close to the ground as they would have liked in Brazil because of the Interlagos bumps, so those cars already falling out of the ideal window will have been further pushed away by running on inters.

But it is not just the minuscule ride-height impact that can make a difference when it comes to the aero impact of the tyres, because sidewall stiffness is perhaps an even more important element.

How the tyre deforms under cornering load, and when downforce is applied, has a big impact on the car’s aerodynamics, which is why teams put a lot of effort into ensuring that their cars are optimised to take the changing shape of tyres into account.

That is why wind tunnel tyres are designed to replicate in perfect scale the sidewall deformation that real-life tyres have.

A change of sidewall stiffness and a subtle impact on ride height is certainly more than enough to alter the aero map of a car, potentially shifting the balance and making what is a benign car in the dry quite pointy in the wet.

Haas team principal Ayao Komatsu, whose own team seemed to be worse off on the inter than the slick, said it was not a new phenomenon for his squad – as Spa earlier this year had exposed problems of his car losing rear downforce when put on to rain-weather tyres.

Pirelli tyres on the car of Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Pirelli tyres on the car of Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

«The amount of aero balance we need to take out just shows the rear of the car is weak on the intermediate tyres, which is a new problem this year,» he said.

«You design the car with your wind tunnel tyres for dry conditions, obviously. Then, I can’t remember when we first ran the inters or wet, but straight away we lost so much stability.»

On the flip side, the Red Bulls and Alpine certainly seemed to be a step ahead of the opposition in the wet.

What the data says

While teams do not yet have answers as to whether the aero influence of the tyres was decisive in Brazil, analysis of lap times definitely points to some shift in trends.

Most interesting is that the Brazilian GP weekend, with its dry sprint event and wet rain race, offered us a snapshot of performance differences across the two conditions.

And while qualifying comparisons are not totally indicative, because some cars did not show their full potential in the same conditions as others, they do at least show how some teams moved around in the pecking order – with Alpine and RB certainly looking relatively better in the wet and Ferrari dropping back.

The below results show the fastest car from each team in Q3.

Sprint qualifying result — Dry

 

Qualifying — Wet

 

But a more accurate gauge of the pace of the cars, and how things moved around from the dry to the wet, comes from race pace.

Looking at the fastest car from each team, based on clean racing laps — so not including pitstops nor restarts — we get the following data set.

Sprint — Dry

 

Race — Wet

 

Red Bull and Mercedes’ pace was certainly much improved in the wet relative to its rivals, while McLaren and Ferrari fell back.

And Ferrari’s was perhaps the biggest drop-off, as Alpine and RB proved to be quicker over the stints.



Source link

The uncomfortable decision facing Lawrence Stroll


You can build the most impressive factory and fill it with all the latest equipment and computer software. Construct the most sophisticated in-house wind tunnel, boosting the potential of your team’s development rate. You can hire the most successful F1 designer of all time, paying him £30 million a year to design your cars.

But it doesn’t matter one bit if the biggest weakness in the whole of the operation is the person responsible for delivering the results on track.

Lance Stroll’s formation lap blunder at the start of the Brazilian Grand Prix was evidence enough that if Aston Martin is deadly serious — as would seem by Lawrence Stroll’s considerable financial investment in the team’s new Silverstone factory — about becoming world champions, then an urgent rethink about its driver line up is required.

Stroll thudded his AMR24 into the Interlagos on the formation lap. Afterwards, in the media pen, he explained how he “had a huge rear lock” and hinted at a “brake failure problem”. Maybe so, and yes, he could also blame the heavy rain, standing water or even the uneven, bumpy surface, which he didn’t.

What is totally inexplicable is not the fact he hit the barriers (as he also did in qualifying), but his bewildering decision to turn his Aston Martin around and drive straight into the gravel, beaching his car so that he would not be able to start the race.

Such an error could be bestowed upon Oliver Bearman or even Franco Colapinto, who have not even raced in a handful of Grands Prix yet. But Stroll, somewhat incredibly in itself, has knocked up 163 starts across eight seasons.

You could even argue that had he even been driving for Sauber and sat at the very back of the grid, yes, it would have been embarrassing but tolerable. But this is Aston Martin. If you believe the hype, potential world champion in the not-too-distant future.

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin F1 Team in the garage

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin F1 Team in the garage

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

Stroll sits 13th in the drivers’ championship, having been marooned on 24 points since the Hungarian GP in July when he was 10th. By way of a benchmark, his team-mate Fernando Alonso is on 62 points.

In his inter-team battle with Alonso since the start of 2023, the two-time F1 world champion has outscored the Canadian in 35 races, while Stroll has done the reverse just 10 times.

This is not just a trend with Alonso either. In his first season in F1 with Williams in 2017, Felipe Massa edged the battle 13 to seven. At Force India/Racing Point, Sergio Perez was 26 to 11.

To his credit Stroll, who did win the Italian Formula 4, Toyota Racing Series and European Formula 3 titles to earn his place on the grid, shaded the team-mate battle against Sergey Sirotkin at Williams in 2018 and did in fact beat Sebastian Vettel during their spell as team-mates at Aston Martin, although whether Vettel had checked out or not is a moot point.

There have been flashes of promise. Stroll took his maiden podium at the 2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix and repeated that feat twice in 2020, at the Italian and the Sakhir GPs. The same year, he took his lone F1 pole at the Turkish GP, which he led for 32 laps. But the reality is the 26-year-old cannot deliver on a regular basis and is still prone to some inexcusable mistakes — as last Sunday proved.

Then there is his attitude to F1. Stroll’s future in the world championship has long been questioned. It was not that long ago that rumours began to surface that he was considering a career in tennis — something that he quickly dismissed as pie in the sky. But there has always been the widely-held suspicion that his heart is not really in it.

Something more unsavoury was his behaviour at the 2023 Qatar GP where, angry at being eliminated from the first qualifying session, Stroll appeared to push his trainer out of the way in frustration. It did at least show some passion and you could use that to argue that he does care about F1.

To his credit, Stroll showed guts to return to race in Bahrain last year just two weeks after breaking his wrist and toe in a cycling accident. Overcoming the pain barrier, he finished sixth. But last year he scored just 74 of Aston Martin’s total of 280 points.

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR23, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL60, Esteban Ocon, Alpine A523

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR23, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL60, Esteban Ocon, Alpine A523

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Yes, he is the owner’s son, but Lawrence Stroll is an accomplished businessman. So how is it possible that he is willing to ignore the glaringly obvious fallible part of the team? Presumably, his focus is on just how the team that started so positively in 2023 has again managed to take steps backwards with its development to limp over the line.

Aston Martin has rolled out the red carpet for Adrian Newey in the hope his designs can bring a revival of fortune. And it is not just Newey who has been signed, with Lawrence Stroll also recruiting other big names such as Enrico Cardile, who will join as Chief Technical Officer from Ferrari. Former Mercedes AMG HPP Managing Director, Andy Cowell, has taken the position of Group CEO, replacing Martin Whitmarsh in an expensive reshuffle.

Scrutiny will be on the aerodynamic design team and just what is going wrong. But there is a more obvious problem and, while it might be an uncomfortable one, it is looking increasingly like Stroll needs to take his son out of the cockpit if the team is to make good on its potential.

In fact, it might not even prove to be that painful a decision in the end and there is an option that could even save face. Aston Martin is entering the 2025 24 Hours of Le Mans Hypercar class with its Valkyrie prototype and Stroll would be well-suited to switch codes and pilot it.

His experience in F1 would be a vital asset in Aston’s fledgling Hypercar project, and provide another perspective currently missing from its stable of GT drivers. It has the potential for considerable success, considering how Ferrari integrated ex-Sauber F1 racer Antonio Giovinazzi into its successful Le Mans project with the 499P LMH.

So who could Aston replace him with? It appears to have missed out on the glut of young talent that has surfaced this season with Bearman, Andrea Kimi Antonelli and Colapinto all signed to long-term deals. The team is also poised to miss out on Formula 2 championship leader, Gabriel Bortoleto, who is set to join Sauber next season.

Aston’s current reserve drivers are 2022 F2 champion Felipe Drugovich and Formula E champion Stoffel Vandoorne, both easily capable of filling Stroll’s place in the team. Another option could be Yuki Tsunoda, given that Honda will become Aston’s engine partner in 2026 and the Japanese driver’s chances seem limited at Red Bull.

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24

Lance Stroll, Aston Martin AMR24

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images



Source link

Herbert hits back at Jos Verstappen over integrity claims


Johnny Herbert has insisted he is entitled to his opinions on reigning Formula 1 world champion Max Verstappen as a response to criticism from the Dutchman’s father, Jos.

The two former F1 drivers are at loggerheads after Herbert initially remarked that the time penalties dished out to the Red Bull driver during the Mexico Grand Prix “would not stop [him] from pushing Lando Norris off the track in the future”.

Jos was livid that Herbert, who was acting as an FIA race steward at the Mexican Grand Prix, was airing his views in public having administered the penalties, insisting that “a steward shouldn’t talk to the press at all and just deliver work all the time”.

The bitterness continued at the Brazilian Grand Prix when Max Verstappen, who was also heavily criticised by Sky F1’s Damon Hill for his manoeuvres on Norris, claimed: “I’ve got the wrong passport for this paddock”.

However, Herbert who was again an FIA race steward in Brazil last weekend, has insisted he is not biased.

And in a barb aimed at Jos, he questioned his position to be critical of Red Bull’s operations, having been outspoken against his son’s team on a number of occasions this year.

“I am Johnny Herbert the steward and the professional during a race weekend and Johnny Herbert a pundit at other times, who expresses what he thinks,» Herbert told SafestBettingSites.co.uk.

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

«When I am a steward, I do not express any opinions.

“Everyone has an opinion. [Sky Sports F1’s] Martin Brundle has an opinion. Why can’t I when I am not at the racetrack? The racetrack has been my world for 50 years. If I don’t quite agree with what I see on the racetrack I will say so. It is not just Max. I’ll criticise anyone if I feel it is warranted.

“I understand it from Jos’s point of view because it is his son. Is there any bias? No, of course not. I wasn’t the only one to think that Max was over the top in Mexico. Lando Norris and [McLaren boss] Zak Brown thought so too.

“When I do speak to people on a Monday or Tuesday that is outside my stewarding responsibilities.

“Jos has always been very outspoken about what is happening at Red Bull. Is that his position to be? It is all very similar. If you have an opinion and you want to make it, then you can.”

Meanwhile, Herbert says that Norris, who trails Verstappen by 62 points in the drivers’ championship with just 86 available in the final three races, will learn from his title fight.

“McLaren and Lando missed out on seven points in Hungary because they let Piastri win and it’s those things they need to be conscious of going into next season,» added the three-time F1 race winner.

“Will they lose the championship this year, no because they were always on catch-up. They could have got more points, but that is racing. Max had the clear lead and then didn’t win after June.

“McLaren will learn for next year and have a stronger mindset. Lando will go into 2025 knowing he can beat Max.”



Source link

McLaren insists Norris title was never main goal following Brazil setback


McLaren says that guiding Lando Norris to the drivers’ championship was never ultimately its main target – as it has always been more focused on the constructors’ crown.

Norris had a golden opportunity to close down Max Verstappen’s points advantage in the Brazilian Grand Prix after starting on pole position and his rival down in 17th on the grid.

But a combination of a lack of pace in the wet, driving errors, brake lock-up problems and a badly timed red flag meant the Briton finished sixth – with Verstappen producing a sensational performance to win.

That result has left him 62 points adrift of Verstappen with only three rounds remaining.

Read Also:

While the Brazil outcome is a disappointment for Norris in personal terms, McLaren says it changes nothing in its approach, because it was only ever thinking about the constructors’ battle anyway.

Asked by Autosport about how the Brazil result would impact the approach to the final races, and whether or not it would actually take some pressure off Norris, McLaren team principal Andrea Stella said: “In terms of the constructors’ championship, I don’t think it changes anything.

“It was always our priority. Even when there was a call to be made to support one driver or the other, it was always secondary to that to maximising the constructors’ championship.”

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Andrew Ferraro / Motorsport Images

Stella did not feel that the potential of being in a title battle had much of an impact on Norris’s performance at Interlagos, as he felt both team and driver knew it was a bonus to be in the fight in the first place.

“When it comes to the drivers’ championship, I don’t think for Lando there was any particular pressure,” he said.

“We were enjoying this quest, even though sometimes from the outside it may come across like there is an error here or there maybe.

“It is like when we locked the tyres with the car like we had [in Brazil] I am not looking at the driver, I am looking at why the car keeps locking the front tyres in conditions like this. I don’t think pressure was a significant factor at all.

“Mathematically we are still in the [drivers’] championship, but I think for Lando and for Oscar, we will go to the next races trying to win the races.

“The last two venues should be quite good. Vegas will be potentially more of a Ferrari track, and then we will see. It is all to play for, and the constructors’ championship remains and has always been our priority.”

Norris himself has always played down thoughts of the title, thinking it was ultimately a long shot to come from so far back.

Asked how hard the Brazil result was to digest now that the title dream was all but over, he said: “Quite easy. I did all I could today. That’s all. Max won the race. Good on him. Well done, but it doesn’t change anything for me.”

While Norris lost ground in the drivers’ championship in Brazil, McLaren managed to extend its constructors’ advantage over Ferrari by seven points to 36 points – which makes it increasingly likely that the battle will go all the way to the final round in Abu Dhabi.

Watch: How the Right Calls Led to Verstappen’s Incredible Comeback — F1 Brazil GP Race Reaction



Source link