Метка: Kevin Magnussen

Magnussen to depart Haas after 2024 F1 season, Ocon closes on 2025 deal


Kevin Magnussen will leave the Haas Formula 1 team at the end of the 2024 season, the American squad announced on Thursday.

Magnussen holds the record for most F1 races started for Haas – 135, out of a career total of 175 which included time racing for McLaren and Renault.

The Dane is currently in his second stint racing for Haas, having initially been let go after the 2020 season before being brought back for 2022 when the team dropped Nikita Mazepin and his sponsor Uralkali on the eve of that season due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Magnussen scored an impressive fifth in the first race of the 2022 campaign, where his strong showings across from then-team-mate Mick Schumacher contributed to the German being replaced by Nico Hulkenberg for 2023.

But since then, fellow veteran Hulkenberg has shaded Magnussen – scoring nearly 75% of Haas’s 39 points and taking its best finishes of sixth (twice, in the last two 2024 races) in that period.

Hulkenberg has opted to join the Sauber/Audi project for 2025 and with Ollie Bearman already signed in one of Haas’s seats for next year, Magnussen’s exit had nevertheless long been expected – his early 2024 campaign complicated by a series of penalties that will keep him on the verge of a race ban until the year’s end at least.

There was also an uncomfortable phase around the Miami Grand Prix, where Magnussen’s insistence that his very aggressive defence against Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton had been done on behalf of Haas (with Hulkenberg scoring two points ahead with seventh in the sprint contest) not going down well internally as no such instruction was given.

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-22

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-22

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

“I’d like to extend my thanks to everyone at Haas F1 Team – I’m proud to have raced for such a great team of people these last few years,” said Magnussen.

“In particular I’d like to thank Gene Haas for his commitment to me, notably in bringing me back once again in 2022 when I thought, at that time at least, my time in Formula 1 had ended.

“I’ve enjoyed some great moments with this team – memories I’ll never forget.

“While I’m looking forward to the next chapter of my racing career, I remain fully focused on giving everything I’ve got for the rest of 2024 with Haas F1 Team.”

Magnussen’s exit mirrors that of Esteban Ocon’s from Alpine, with the Frenchman, who is understood to be close to signing a deal to race with Haas from 2025, being announced back in early June as leaving his current squad without his replacement being named.

Although Magnussen’s news clears the path for Haas to announce Ocon, it is understood he is yet to formally sign to final contract with the team.

Speaking about Magnussen, who first began to race for Haas in 2017, the squad’s second F1 season, team principal Ayao Komatsu said: “I’d like to thank Kevin for everything he’s given us as a team – both on and off the track.

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24

Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images

“He’s truly been a bedrock of our driver line-up over the years.

“Nobody’s driven more races for us and we’ve had some memorable highlights together – not least a remarkable fifth place finish at the Bahrain Grand Prix in 2022 when Kevin returned to start his second spell with the team.

“He wasn’t expecting to be driving a Formula 1 car that weekend, but he put in a remarkable performance that was a tremendous boost to the entire organization and once again showcased his own talents behind the wheel.

“There’s plenty of racing to go this year so I’m looking forward to seeing what else we can achieve with Kevin as we push together in the championship.”

Komastu also teased that “beyond that” and given “Kevin’s special relationship with the team”, Magnussen may yet be offered a non-racing role to stay aligned with Haas for the future.

“I’m hoping we can find a way to keep working together in some capacity,” Komatsu added.

“We can hopefully define that in the near future, but his extensive experience in Formula 1 and knowledge of our working operations are undoubtedly of value in our ongoing growth and development.”



Source link

Was Magnussen’s Canadian GP assessment correct after early heroics?


From 14th on the grid, Magnussen found the extreme wet tyre particularly potent in the first six laps when the circuit was at its most slippery, and carved his way up to fourth by the end of lap three.

That put him in touching distance of the top three but, as the circuit began to dry out, the crossover point between intermediates and wets began to close in.

In measuring Magnussen’s early tours versus those of Oscar Piastri, whom the Dane had passed for fourth, that crossover point arrived on lap six: Magnussen set a 1m34.673s, Piastri a 1m33.060s, which prompted Haas to bring Magnussen in on the following lap for intermediates.

So, one might think that it was the right call for Magnussen to come in — he’d now started lapping slower than the cars ahead. A slow pitstop rather hurt his chances and cost him track position, but he shook out in 13th nonetheless to at least make a position.

«It was looking good,» he explained post-race. «We took the right choice on the full wets — but then I think we pitted off onto the inter too early because we ended up having to take another inter. We could have stretched that full wet, to then go on to the inter and stay on it instead.

«On top of that, we had a very slow pit stop. It felt like we had some opportunity there — but didn’t get anything out of it.

«We didn’t try and take any crazy gamble or anything. We just did what we felt was right for the conditions. And it looked okay, so I think we did the right thing there to begin with but — then didn’t back it up with the right decisions thereafter.»

Haas tried to go longer with Nico Hulkenberg’s stint, and the German hung on until lap 12 having made his own ascent up the field to seventh. After the sixth-lap cross-over, Hulkenberg was lapping between 1-1.5 seconds slower than Daniel Ricciardo behind, before the Australian eventually took back control of eighth on lap 11.

Alex Albon, Williams FW46, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Logan Sargeant, Williams FW46

Alex Albon, Williams FW46, Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Logan Sargeant, Williams FW46

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

But Hulkenberg was battling a car he noted was «not fully healthy», so it stands to reason that Magnussen might have been able to have gained a few tenths over his team-mate’s range of times in the 1m34s. It seemed like Haas had timed its Magnussen stop to limit the damage of the time taken to pit while the field spread was sufficient, but the slow stop cost about five to six seconds and the timing meant that Magnussen needed to stop again under the safety car.

It was expected that rain was due before the race’s mid-point, although answering Magnussen’s suggestion will be made with the benefit of hindsight. Perhaps hanging it out until lap 15 would have negated the need for an extra stop under the safety car for new inters, that call-in eventually shuffling Magnussen down back to 14th.

Let’s take a look at how the wet tyre strategy could have played out, without that seventh-lap stop, and we’ll do the same for Hulkenberg and his lap 12 pitstop — although his lap times will require less in the way of extrapolation.

At the end of lap six, Magnussen was 4.76s clear of Piastri. Assuming he could continue at the same pace, Piastri would have needed two or three more laps to mount a pass on pure pace, although the need to back off onto the wet parts of the circuit might have hindered that slightly.

Regardless, Magnussen was not really racing the McLaren driver; this is purely an experiment to determine if Haas could have managed points. Thus, comparing the laps of Ricciardo, Lance Stroll, Charles Leclerc, and Yuki Tsunoda is perhaps more worthwhile as a point of reference.

Here’s what we’ll do: ‘tare’ Magnussen at the end of the second lap, and work out the relative gaps of those cars who battled for points at the lower end of the top 10. Next, his recorded lap time from lap seven will be deleted and the delta over his previous lap extrapolated to the end of the lap. He was approximately 0.36s up before the braking zone for Turns 13/14, so we’ll take that off his sixth-lap 1m34.673s.

For ease, we’ll transpose in Hulkenberg’s lap times from lap eight to lap 11; although he was over a second slower per lap than Magnussen, this was due to him spending longer in traffic. By the time Hulkenberg had got up to seventh he was more consistently in the 1m34s after the battling Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton pulled clear, which is much more representative of the wet tyre pace, although his calculated 12th lap is much slower given his weird approach to the hairpin.

We’ll apply that to his own times but, for Magnussen, we’ll instead more steadily degrade his times in line with the drying track performance. It’s hard to know what the performance deltas per lap will be, as Pirelli does not so readily supply that information, but estimating is half the fun.

Here’s where we are when we build up the lap time picture with conservative estimates for laps 12-15. (All figures in seconds)

Lap Magnussen Ricciardo Stroll Leclerc Tsunoda Hulkenberg
2 (delta) 0 4.291 5.428 7.908 9.01 6.155
3 96.134 100.559 100.688 99.247 99.935 96.651
4 93.993 97.504 97.302 97.813 97.475 95.053
5 94.529 97.388 97.044 96.358 95.882 96.104
6 94.673 96.684 96.655 96.3 96.646 96.178
7 94.313 93.997 93.695 94.541 94.176 96.158
8 94.17 93.341 93.549 93.768 93.491 94.17
9 94.267 92.518 92.85 92.791 92.88 94.267
10 94.671 93.382 92.786 92.094 92.028 94.671
11 94.672 93.504 94.245 94.16 94 94.672
12 94.872 90.514 91.2 93.158 93.494 96.172
13 95.072 90.251 90.255 90.52 90.362 95.072
14 95.272 88.964 89.446 89.171 89.622 95.272
15 95.472 88.743 89.017 88.868 89.266 95.472
SUM 1232.11 1221.64 1224.16 1226.697 1228.267 1246.067
GAP 0 -10.47 -7.95 -5.413 -3.843 13.957
GAP to P1 54.594 44.124 46.644 49.181 50.751 68.551
STOP 79.594 44.124 46.644 49.181 50.751 93.551

Based on the lap deltas, Magnussen appears to fall 10 seconds behind Ricciardo which puts him 13th before his stop — exactly where he ended up after his pitstop. Hulkenberg is a further 14 seconds behind his own team-mate, although this gains him one position and puts him 18th — marginally ahead of Zhou Guanyu. This is all pre-pitstop however and, assuming a 25-second stop, both Haas drivers would end up some way adrift at the back — Magnussen is 79.594s off the lead, with Hulkenberg 93.551s away.

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24, Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

Fresh intermediates for 10 laps would reward them with some lap time, although their real-world pace on fresh inters was not much quicker overall than that of Logan Sargeant’s. And, if the plan is to save tyres to ensure they’re in decent nick for the second downpour, it’s hard to see it changing. So, assuming pace is stagnant, the gaps will remain the same.

However, this is the key bit: how much do they get back from not stopping under the lap 25 safety car?

Three drivers stayed out on the same set of inters during the safety car: Tsunoda, Valtteri Bottas, and Esteban Ocon. Collating an average of their lap 25 times, we get a ‘stay out’ lap of a 1m52.613s, over 10s quicker versus the pit-in time that the Haas drivers actually managed (2m09.198 for Magnussen, 2m03.974 for Hulkenberg).

But that 10 seconds isn’t enough to bring the Haas duo back into play — an end-of-lap 15 stop appears to be too late. The two basically lose a pitstop by staying on the wets for longer as the intermediates are several seconds per lap quicker, and they would need to gain that back plus change for staying out.

What about stopping on lap 12 and staying out under the safety car?

Lap Magnussen Ricciardo Stroll Leclerc Tsunoda Hulkenberg
2 (delta) 0 4.291 5.428 7.908 9.01 6.155
3 96.134 100.559 100.688 99.247 99.935 96.651
4 93.993 97.504 97.302 97.813 97.475 95.053
5 94.529 97.388 97.044 96.358 95.882 96.104
6 94.673 96.684 96.655 96.3 96.646 96.178
7 94.313 93.997 93.695 94.541 94.176 96.158
8 94.17 93.341 93.549 93.768 93.491 94.17
9 94.267 92.518 92.85 92.791 92.88 94.267
10 94.671 93.382 92.786 92.094 92.028 94.671
11 94.672 93.504 94.245 94.16 94 94.672
12 94.872 90.514 91.2 93.158 93.494 96.172
SUM 946.294 953.682 955.442 958.138 959.017 960.251
GAP 0 7.388 9.148 11.844 12.723 13.957
GAP TO P1 34.843 42.231 43.991 46.687 47.566 48.8
+L12 STOP 59.843 42.231 43.991 46.687 47.566 73.8

After his actual stop, Hulkenberg emerged onto the track in 19th place. The lap before the safety car, he was nine seconds behind Bottas who did not stop. Assuming the same gap, albeit one that was compressing as the safety car started to back up the field, Hulkenberg could at best have hoped to sit 16th as the stops shook out, still behind Bottas who ultimately did not register any points.

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24 battles with Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Kevin Magnussen, Haas VF-24 battles with Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

It might have worked out for Magnussen, however; an end-of-lap-12 stop would have put him somewhere between the Saubers, although fresh intermediates might have got him ahead of Bottas and knocking on the door of Gasly. That puts him in Ocon territory when the stops come, offering a shot at ninth or 10th when the race shakes out into its final order.

Perhaps, then, Magnussen has a point — literally and figuratively. Had his stint on the extreme wet been extended by five laps and not hindered by slow pitstops, he’d have likely presented a much more compelling prospect to add to Haas’ points tally for the season.

But, to quote Italian celebrity chef and TV personality Gino D’Acampo: if his grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bike. Extrapolating from incomplete data, especially in a wet race, is often folly — but Haas might have been better served to keep Magnussen on the wets for a few more laps…



Source link

What Magnussen needs to fix to retain his Haas F1 seat


Last year’s VF-23 was somewhat peculiar; although it showed great pace in qualifying in Nico Hulkenberg’s control, tyre management issues plagued it in the races. The drivers stated that, to make it to the end on conventional strategies, they had to stop racing the cars around Haas and effectively pin their hopes on the whims of fortune.

This year’s car is a different prospect. The team’s test programme in Bahrain eschewed performance running in a concerted effort to get a grasp of Pirelli’s range of tyre compounds, which has given the team much more presence in the fight over minor points placings.

Once again, however, it’s Hulkenberg who has earned the lion’s share of plaudits. The German has not only found a good balance in qualifying trim but has been able to convert that on occasion into points — vital, given the scarcity of scoring possibilities for the lower-ranked teams this year.

Magnussen, however, has struggled. The Dane has not been able to tap into the same vein of qualifying pace that Hulkenberg seems to find much more easily, and thus his races have been compromised.

His defensive efforts have either been worthy of praise or have tarnished his reputation, depending on who you ask, but it’s fair to say that they’d be a lot less necessary had his qualifying results been up to par.

Even compared to Haas’ leaner years in 2019 and 2023, Magnussen reckons that 2024’s opening third has been the «most frustrating» start to a year he’s ever experienced. When the cars have been poor, Magnussen could be depended upon to roll with the punches; now, even with competitive machinery, he has found it hard to unlock the performance available.

«That’s probably been the most frustrating start to a year I’ve ever had, it just seems like an uphill struggle all the time. It’s not clicking. Hopefully, we can turn things around. We have a strong package. So we’ve got to use it.»

Photo by: Erik Junius

His Monaco crash with Perez aside, Magnussen has also been employed as Hulkenberg’s rear-gunner more than he’d like. He accepted that role, not with particularly great gusto, but nonetheless has not done so with any half-measures.

Helping Hulkenberg build a pitstop window in Jeddah cemented his efficacy in that role, even if Yuki Tsunoda and Alex Albon had their noses put out of joint, and the literal over-the-line defence in Miami has also defined his opening eight races.

He at least has a point to show for his efforts, one scored in Australia as Haas secured its first double-points finish since Austria 2022, Furthermore, he’s outqualified Hulkenberg twice, particularly at the races when Haas didn’t seem to hold much of a candle over one lap.

Yet, he’s also been eliminated in Q1 four times and has yet to make it to the final stage once — something Hulkenberg has achieved on four occasions in 2024.

Magnussen refuses to put this down to luck. He is aware that there is something within himself halting progress, something for which he seeks an answer.

«I hate stating bad luck because it’s a lot of times you have something to say and even though things aren’t going your way and you feel like you’re not getting lucky, then you kind of have that as an excuse.

«We’ve just got to keep our heads cool, and stay positive about the strong package that we have — and try to have it click.»

If qualifying is the main issue, then let’s look at the differences between the two Haas drivers. China and Miami are the two glaring examples here, as both featured Hulkenberg bursting onto the Q3 scene and Magnussen toiling in a failed effort to get out of Q1.

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Up for scrutiny is their Q1 deltas, and there are small differences between their respective approaches. In China, Hulkenberg used lower gears to take the low-speed Turns 6 and 11 to get better acceleration out of the corner, and his throttle modulation through Turns 7 and 8 — both on the approach and in the corner transition — was a case of losing time in one section to gain more elsewhere. There seems to be a much bigger-picture approach from Hulkenberg over a single lap.

Magnussen is less consistent. He spent most of his Miami Q1 lap up on Hulkenberg’s delta, carrying more speed through Turns 6-7-8, although lost most of it through his upshifts. The slow-speed underpass section was neck-and-neck; Hulkenberg gained time, but this time his team-mate dropped down a gear to get a better exit from Turn 16. Instead, it was all lost in the final corners as Magnussen overcooked his braking point, losing him almost 0.3s in the process.

If Magnussen could put it all together, he’d be on Hulkenberg’s pace without question. He’s better at carrying more speed through corners, but that fearlessness comes back to bite him too often — and it is isolated errors that cost time rather than an outright lack of pace. Perhaps there’s a disconnect between driver and car, or perhaps it’s one pushing the other too far beyond its bounds.

The unsentimental nature of F1 means that, as Magnussen feels the pressure to find a solution, further pressure is placed upon him as a wild driver market ratchets up in intensity. It is known that Haas is considering Esteban Ocon for a seat in 2025, while Oliver Bearman is likely up for the other seat which will be vacated by Hulkenberg next year.

To ward off the threat of Ocon and demonstrate to Haas that he remains the right driver for the role, Magnussen needs to make a breakthrough. The best time for that, as ever, was yesterday; the upcoming Canadian Grand Prix is the next best opportunity. Trouble is, he’s only ever scored once at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve: in 2014, when he finished ninth for McLaren.

Magnussen at least has continuity in his favour, something that Haas has largely valued in its F1 tenure. If he starts matching Hulkenberg in making Q3 appearances and consistently knocking on the door of the top 10, all while managing his racecraft to ensure he doesn’t risk a ban owing to the 10 points on his licence, he’ll put himself in a much better position.

It won’t be easy, but it’ll be the difference between racing in F1 in 2025 and looking elsewhere to continue his racing career.

Watch: Canadian GP Race Preview — Who Will Master Montreal?



Source link

F1 drivers who have been banned from racing and why


Haas’ Kevin Magnussen is just two superlicence penalty points away from a full race ban after accumulating 10 points over the first six races of 2024. The Danish driver doubled his penalty points over the Miami Grand Prix weekend for several reasons, including leaving the track multiple times to gain an advantage and causing a collision with Logan Sargeant.

Magnussen initially called the sprint penalties “well deserved” for his “stupid tactics”, but ahead of the Imola GP he confirmed he will “have to” race differently and “be careful not to get a race ban”.

When questioned about whether he thought there was something wrong with the current penalty point system, Magnussen said: «The fact that I’m at risk of a race ban for driving outside of some white lines – on a piece of Tarmac – I don’t know if I feel that that is right.

«But it is the way the rules are. I accept that but I feel there is room for improvement there. Not only in terms of the [penalty] points. There are more races now than there was back when they were introduced and I feel you can end up getting a race ban effectively for a very minor thing. That’s what I feel.»

Magnussen now leads the F1 grid with the most penalty points this season and faces the risk of a full race ban. The penalty point system is in place to control driver behaviour, and any points will not expire until 12 months after they were awarded.

If a driver receives 12 penalty points on their licence they will face a race ban and will not be allowed to compete in the following grand prix. No driver has faced a race ban under the current penalty point system, which was introduced in 2014.

George Russell, the director of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association, has since shared the positive impact of a race ban, and added that he did not think the penalty system needed changing. The Mercedes driver said: «If you look over the last 20 years I don’t know how many drivers have been given a race ban. I can only think of one there’s been in 20 years. In a football game people get red cards quite regularly.

«You can look at it saying there’d be an opportunity for a young driver to show what they are capable of if a driver is deserving of a race ban. Maybe a race ban is a bit harsh but things shouldn’t go unpunished.»

Alongside the licence points, there is a range of penalties that can be handed out, depending on the severity of the driver or team’s actions.

F1 drivers who received a race ban

Romain Grosjean — 2012 Belgian Grand Prix

Romain Grosjean, Lotus E20 is launched over the top of Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F2012

Romain Grosjean, Lotus E20 is launched over the top of Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F2012

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Romain Grosjean was handed a one-race ban and fined €50,000 for causing a crash at the start of the 2012 Belgian GP. The Lotus driver had an incident-packed season with seven early-race clashes in the first 12 contests, which culminated in a multi-car crash at the start of the Spa encounter.

Grosjean moved up the inside of La Source, squeezing Lewis Hamilton tightly between himself and the pitwall and onto the grass. The pair then made contact before crashing into Fernando Alonso in the Ferrari and both the Saubers of Sergio Perez and Kamui Kobayashi, the latter having started second on the grid.

Pastor Maldonado was also caught by Grosjean during the accident, which sent the Williams spinning in front of Perez, who had completely lost his rear wing. In the chaos of the crash, Grosjean went airborne over the top of Alonso’s car before coming to a stop against the outside wall.

Kobayashi and Maldonado were the only two drivers to continue after the crash, but the Sauber driver had significant damage to his car’s side.

Grosjean accepted that the race ban was his mistake but added he had not intended to squeeze Hamilton against the wall, saying: “We know that La Source is a very tough corner. It was a bit of a crazy start as well with [Pastor] Maldonado leaving [the grid early] and the Sauber [Kobayashi] smoking a lot.

«I did a mistake and I misjudged the gap with Lewis. I was sure I was in front of him. So a small mistake made a big incident. I didn’t change my line, I went from left to right. I was not really wanting to put anyone in the wall — I’m not here to stop the race in the first corner. I’m very, very sorry and I’m glad that nobody is hurt.

«But I have to say it is a very, very hard decision to hear.»

The stewards ruled that Grosjean was responsible for the multi-car crash and awarded him a one-race ban for the following week’s Italian GP. They also noted that two of the drivers eliminated in the crash were championship contenders — Alonso (first) and Hamilton (fourth).

A statement from the officials said: “The stewards regard this incident as an extremely serious breach of the regulations which had the potential to cause injury to others.”

It also noted the team had not contested the verdict, saying: «The stewards note the team conceded the action of the driver was an extremely serious mistake and an error of judgement. Neither the team nor the driver made any submission in mitigation of penalty.»

Jerome d’Ambrosio climbed behind the wheel of the Lotus for the 2012 Italian GP, following Grosjean’s ban.

Felipe Massa — 2002 Italian Grand Prix

Massa wasn't banned for Monza clash with de la Rosa, but Sauber replaced him to avoid serving a penalty

Massa wasn’t banned for Monza clash with de la Rosa, but Sauber replaced him to avoid serving a penalty

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Although technically not an official race ban, Felipe Massa was forced to miss the 2002 United States GP due to technicalities in the grid place penalty regulations. The Sauber driver was handed a 10-place grid penalty during the Italian GP for causing a collision with Pedro de la Rosa’s Jaguar.

Both drivers were forced to retire from the race before being called to the stewards to investigate the crash. They found the Brazilian responsible and handed him the 10-place grid penalty — the first of its kind to be awarded to a driver.

In 2002, the regulations stated that the penalty would be in place for ‘the next’ race and not the ‘driver’s next race’, which resulted in Sauber deciding to avoid serving the penalty by removing Massa from the US GP.

Heinz-Harald Frentzen, who had previously driven for the team between 1994-1996, was set to return to the team in 2003 but was brought in for the 2002 US GP in a bid to help the team’s constructors’ championship fight with Jaguar.

Jacques Villeneuve — 1997 Japanese Grand Prix

Villeneuve raced in Japan but was later disqualified

Villeneuve raced in Japan but was later disqualified

Photo by: Williams F1

Jacques Villeneuve’s race ban is a unique situation, after the Williams driver was still allowed to participate in the race due to the team appealing the decision from the stewards. The Canadian driver was leading the championship by nine points from Michael Schumacher at the time, with two races remaining.

Villeneuve had qualified on pole for the 1997 Japanese GP but, ahead of the race, he was disqualified from participating by the stewards. They ruled he had failed to slow his Williams at the Spoon Curve during Saturday’s practice session when passing the stranded Tyrrell of Jos Verstappen.

He was one of five drivers that had failed to slow for the yellow flags, with Schumacher, Rubens Barrichello, Johnny Herbert and Ukyo Katayama all receiving one-race bans, which were suspended until the end of the season. Villeneuve had already previously committed the same offence on three other occasions and, with a suspended ban already looming over the Williams driver, he was given an immediate ban for the next race (which was the Japanese GP as it had not taken place).

Williams lodged an appeal against the stewards’ decision to ban Villeneuve from the race and, with no time to assemble a hearing, he was allowed to take part from his pole position. During the race he was able to finish fifth, which awarded him two points — however, Williams decided to withdraw its appeal so the race ban was upheld and he was disqualified from the result.

Michael Schumacher — 1994 Italian and Portuguese grands prix

Schumacher was later banned for failing to serve penalty for overtaking on the green-flag lap

Schumacher was later banned for failing to serve penalty for overtaking on the green-flag lap

Photo by: LAT Photographic

Michael Schumacher was awarded a two-race ban in 1994, missing both the Italian and Portuguese grands prix. The German driver received a penalty for overtaking Damon Hill on the formation lap of the British GP and then repeated the violation following an aborted start.

Under the 1994 regulations, the first offence should have resulted in Schumacher being ordered to start from the back of the grid but the British GP officials were unaware of these rules. On lap 13 he was given a penalty but there was initial confusion as it was announced he was penalised five seconds and Benetton did not call him in to pit as there was no mention it was a stop/go penalty.

Again under 1994 regulations, any time penalty given before the final 12 laps of the race must have been served in the pitlane. After seven laps had passed, Schumacher was shown the black flag, which indicated that he must return to the pits. He ignored the black flag, claiming he could only see his number being displayed but not the flag itself.

Benetton decided to appeal the verdict, which meant a hearing did not take place until after the Belgian GP, which Schumacher was also disqualified from. His car was found to have “illegal wear” on the skid block, which Benetton protested was due to him spinning over a kerb.

However, this was rejected by the FIA as it was claimed there was a pattern of wear and damage to the block. Following the race, Schumacher’s two-race ban was upheld by the FIA and he was forced to miss the Italian and Portuguese events.

Mika Hakkinen — 1994 British Grand Prix

Hakkinen (whose McLaren is spinning here) was banned for his part in this Hockenheim pile-up

Hakkinen (whose McLaren is spinning here) was banned for his part in this Hockenheim pile-up

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Mika Hakkinen was given a one-race ban, suspended for three races, alongside Rubens Barrichello for a last-lap collision at the 1994 British GP. However, his ban was triggered at the start of the following race — the German GP — when the McLaren driver caused a multiple-car collision at the first corner.

Hakkinen made contact with David Coulthard’s Williams and spun across the field, taking out several cars in the process. There were 11 retirements during the first lap of the race with 10 drivers being involved in crashes before the first corner.

The Finnish driver accepted the penalty and McLaren did not appeal the FIA’s decision.

Eddie Irvine — 1994 Pacific, San Marino & Monaco Grands Prix

Irvine's Brazilian GP actions earned him a three-race ban after initial one-race penalty was appealed

Irvine’s Brazilian GP actions earned him a three-race ban after initial one-race penalty was appealed

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Eddie Irvine initially picked up a one-race ban at the Brazilian Grand Prix for causing a four-car collision on lap 35. The Irish driver suddenly swerved to avoid Martin Brundle’s McLaren, which had suffered engine failure, and thereby forced Jos Verstappen onto the grass.

The Benetton driver lost control of his car and flew over the top of Brundle, damaging the Briton’s helmet. The Ligier of Eric Bernard was also caught up in the crash as he attempted to take avoiding action.

Irvine was given a one-race ban and fined $10,000. This was appealed by Jordan but was rejected, and he was given an extended three-race ban. The FIA hoped the decision would serve as a warning to other teams to consider appeals against the stewards’s rulings.

Irvine said the four cars had come together as a result of the stopped McLaren, as well as claiming that his battle with Ayrton Senna the following year in Japan had influenced the officials.

His seat was given to Aguri Suzuki for the Pacific GP, before Andrea de Cesaris climbed into the Jordan for both the San Marino and Monaco races.

Nigel Mansell — 1989 Portuguese Grand Prix

Mansell was already in hot water for pitlane antics before colliding with Senna

Mansell was already in hot water for pitlane antics before colliding with Senna

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Nigel Mansell was given a one-race ban after ignoring a black flag for reversing in the pitlane at the 1989 Portuguese GP. The British driver had locked up coming into the pits and chose to drive around his mechanics instead of driving through them.

Mansell claimed he had not seen the black flag or a Ferrari pitboard, as well as stating he was not able to hear radio messages over the volume of his engine during a battle with Ayrton Senna. Both drivers collided, taking them both out of the race. The FIA took the view that Mansell had been driving under a black flag and had taken out a championship contender, and awarded him a one-race ban.

Ferrari did not replace Mansell with another driver for the Spanish GP to race alongside Gerhard Berger.

Riccardo Patrese — 1978 Italian Grand Prix

Patrese was banned for his part in tragic startline pile-up

Patrese was banned for his part in tragic startline pile-up

Photo by: Motorsport Images

Riccardo Patrese was known for his aggressive racing and had angered a number of drivers at the wheel of his Arrows during the season. At the start of the 1978 Italian GP, Patrese overtook James Hunt, which resulted in the McLaren veering into the right-rear wheel of Ronnie Peterson’s Lotus.

Seven other drivers were caught up in the incident and it resulted in the Lotus flying into the barriers and catching fire. Peterson was trapped inside his car but was freed by Hunt, Clay Regazzoni and Patrick Depallier before he was more badly burnt. The Swedish driver was conscious but had suffered 27 fractures to his legs and feet. Although the injuries were not life-threatening, he died the following day from a fat embolism.

At the next race, Patrese was informed by Bernie Ecclestone that several drivers — including past or future champions Hunt, Mario Andretti, Niki Lauda, Emerson Fittipaldi and Jody Scheckter — would withdraw from the race if he was not banned. Organisers agreed to ban Patrese and, although Arrows sought the opinion of a judge, the team decided to withdraw the Italian from the race.



Source link

Piastri given three-place grid penalty at F1 Imola GP for impeding Magnussen


In Q1 Piastri blocked Haas driver Magnussen into the Tamburello complex on the Dane’s final flyer.

The incident ruined Magnussen’s session, going out in 18th while team-mate Nico Hulkenberg advanced to Q3.

Piastri said that he «didn’t see any cars coming» in his mirror because the main straight before Turn 2 curves to the left, leaving Magnussen in his blind spot.

The three-place grid drop bumps Piastri from second to fifth after qualifying less of a tenth behind polesitter Max Verstappen in Q3. Team-mate Lando Norris and both Ferraris of Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz all move up a spot.

While the FIA race stewards sympathised with the Australian, they judged it was the duty of the team to warn its driver of approaching traffic before it was too late, which they explained happened correctly in all other instances on Saturday.

They wrote: «In fact there was an approximately 140km/h speed differential and Magnussen was only approximately 40-50m behind at the time and this meant that Piastri was in the middle of the chicane when Magnussen caught up directly behind Piastri.

«Further, it was clear that Magnussen was on a fast lap since his exit of Turn 19.

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

«Traffic management for slower cars is an extremely important part of the team/driver combination, particularly in Q1. In this instance the stewards determine that the lack of sufficient warning caused an “unnecessary impeding.”

McLaren team boss Andrea Stella said he accepted the decision, acknowledging that the squad should have done a better job communicating.

«The assessment and the judgment of the stewards, we respect it,» Stella responded.

«We need to improve our operations. We move on and hopefully tomorrow we will recover the positions that we lost today on the grid.»

Piastri said he was otherwise buoyed by McLaren confirming its Miami progress in Imola, where he has also received the full upgrade package from the team.

«I’ve been happy with it all weekend to be honest, from the start of P1 all the way through qualifying,» he said.

Read Also:

«Having parts that you know are going to make the car faster on the car is always a confidence boost.

«I think our long runs yesterday looked good, but it’s very, very close. I think that’s been the story of the season and the last few races, everyone’s been so tight.

«Overtaking is very tough here, but I think we can be optimistic.»



Source link

FIA planning harsher F1 penalties to clamp down on Magnussen Miami tactics


In Miami’s sprint Magnussen was handed three 10-second penalties for leaving the track and gaining an advantage, which meant the Haas driver was able to keep Mercedes rival Lewis Hamilton behind. He also received a fourth penalty, this time a five-second addition, for leaving the track for no justifiable reason that bolstered his penalty points tally in the process.

While Magnussen ruined his own race, his tactics did allow team-mate Hulkenberg to score vital points, mirroring the Dane’s defensive drive in similar circumstances in Saudi Arabia.

Magnussen’s actions were slammed as «unacceptable» and worthy of a race ban by McLaren team boss Andrea Stella, with a growing consensus that the decision to raise the punishment from five to 10 seconds for this season does nothing to deter drivers from blocking rivals illegally to benefit a team-mate.

The Miami stewards decided to stick with 10-second penalties to maintain consistency with previous decisions, but raised in one of their verdicts the point that harsher penalties might be a better solution going forward.

Autosport understands the FIA is keen to start handing out drive-throughs in such scenarios, which solves the issue immediately because it forces the offending drivers to pit and cede track position within two laps.

The matter is set to be discussed by the teams, stewards and the FIA in Friday’s team managers briefing at Imola’s Emilia Romagna Grand Prix.

The escalating punishment would be handed out in case of repeat offences during the same race, when the stewards suspect drivers are intentionally going off track to maintain their position.

A return of stewards telling drivers to give the position back, which was standard practice until handing that responsibility to the drivers from 2022 onwards, is not under consideration.

Kevin Magnussen, Haas F1 Team, on the grid

Kevin Magnussen, Haas F1 Team, on the grid

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Speaking exclusively to Autosport, RB team principal Laurent Mekies said he was in favour of harsher penalties.

«It’s one thing to slow strategically the cars behind you to help your team-mates or to help your race, it’s something different to cut the track and gain a position on somebody to then slow him down,» the former FIA man said.

«I think the sport needs find a way to avoid from happening. It’s not that difficult, it’s called a drive-through. The rulebook completely allows the stewards to judge what happened and do that.

PLUS: The can of worms opened by Magnussen’s Miami F1 sprint antics

«And with the reaction of everyone, we probably don’t want that to continue to be the way of doing things, so in Monaco you could just cut the chicane and slow back down. Even if the guy gets a big penalty or penalty points, it still helps his team-mate to get a point.

«So as a group it’s something that we want to make sure we have the tools to limit that from happening. I think we have them and it’s up to them to enforce it.»



Source link

Miami GP stewards to raise F1 rules issue with FIA as Magnussen cleared


The Haas driver picked up three separate penalties in his battle with Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton for leaving the track and gaining an advantage.

Magnussen’s driving mirrored tactics he used in Saudi Arabia earlier this year where, once penalised, he was able to defend to such an extent that team-mate Nico Hulkenberg could cement his own position. Once again the German was able to secure a points-paying place in Miami.

Following the sprint, Magnussen told Sky Sports F1 that “all the penalties were well deserved” and added: “I started using these stupid tactics, which I don’t like doing, but at the end of the day, I did my job as a team player.”

Having been handed three 10-second penalties for his infringements, Magnussen was summoned to the stewards to determine whether, given his comments in the TV pen, his antics amounted to unsportsmanlike behaviour.

A report from the stewards explained: «The driver candidly explained that he thought that he was entitled to race with Car 44 in the manner that he did and also that he was willing to accept what he considered to be standard penalties that would have been imposed on him for any infringements that occurred while he was battling for position.

«He was also of the view that building a gap between himself and the cars ahead was perfectly within the regulations and it was not uncommon for a driver to seek to assist his team-mate in the course of a race by doing so.

Kevin Magnussen, Haas F1 Team, on the grid

Kevin Magnussen, Haas F1 Team, on the grid

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

«He did not at any point in time think that what he was doing was wrong or that it was in any way unsportsmanlike.

«He highlighted that the Stewards would typically not increase the severity of the penalties for repeat offences.»

Change of rules inbound?

The stewards concluded that as there was «no clear evidence of an intention to behave in a manner that can be said to be unsportsmanlike» and due to the high standard set in determining unsportsmanlike actions no further action should be taken against Magnussen.

But the report made a point in noting that the stewards «disagreed» with the «way in which Car 20 was driven».

Read Also:

And given the repeat offences committed by Magnussen, the report suggested talks would be had over regulation tweaks in order to offer the stewards more power in increasing the severity of punishments to drivers.

The report continued: «Moving forward, the Stewards will need to consider if, in appropriate situations, especially in the case of repeat infringements, the penalties to be applied for each infringement need to be increased to discourage scenarios such as those that we found today.

«This is something that we will raise explicitly with the FIA and the Stewarding team.»



Source link