Метка: Singapore GP

Why McLaren sees only «good news» from its flexi rear wing controversy


McLaren team boss Andrea Stella thinks it is a good thing rival teams are complaining about its car – because this shows they are distracted from their own efforts.

The Woking-based team has found itself the centre of attention since the Azerbaijan Grand Prix over what has become known as its ‘mini-DRS’.

The team appeared to have designed its low-drag rear wing in such a way that the upper element cleverly flexed back to help open up the slot gap – delivering a drag reduction and therefore straightline speed boost.

While the rear wing fully complied with the FIA’s static load tests, its behaviour upset competitors who felt it was pushing the boundaries of the regulations too much.

Following discussions with the FIA, McLaren agreed to make modifications to reduce the flexibility which was seen to be present on its cars in the Belgian, Italian and Azerbaijan grands prix.

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Dom Romney / Motorsport Images

And while the tweak will mean McLaren losing whatever advantage it got from its design when that specific low-drag wing returns at the Las Vegas Grand Prix, Stella is far from disheartened about what has happened.

In fact, he says he actually takes heart from competitors paying so much attention to what his own squad is up to.

Asked for his thoughts on the matter, Stella said: “I find that so much attention on our rear wing is just good news, because it means that opponents are not focusing on themselves.

“Formula 1 is such a marginal game. It’s so complicated. I keep repeating to my team: ‘Focus on yourself’.

“So for me, when I see that there’s so much attention from other teams, it means that they will be doing work, they will be doing analysis, they will be talking to the FIA.

Andrea Stella, Team Principal, McLaren F1 Team

Andrea Stella, Team Principal, McLaren F1 Team

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

“They’re using this time and energy to chase something that I think is a red herring. So for me, as McLaren, that’s just good news.

“We try to stay focused on ourselves. We want to come with technical solutions that may be challenging but totally sound from a legality point of view. If others want to get destructive, keep doing that. Because for us, it’s just good news.”

FIA response

Although McLaren remains convinced its wing design is fully legal, the team says it agreed with the FIA to make changes because it did not want the controversy to blow up – and it also hoped this would prompt the governing body to look at what other teams were up to.

Read Also:

“For us, making changes is pretty much transparent, so we may as well do it, as it won’t be a big consequence from a performance point of view,” said Stella.

“This also gave us the opportunity to [remind] the FIA that, you know, we also do some due diligence in terms of studying other people.

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Lionel Ng / Motorsport Images

“We don’t want to spend so much energy and time with journalists and trying to create big stories. We just told the FIA what we think is happening.

“We trust, and we are confident, that they will talk to the other teams and make sure that they fix their own issues, which may be less visible, but definitely they do exist.”

While Stella did not want to get drawn into what aspect of rival cars he felt the FIA should be looking at, he suggested the issue revolved around manipulation of the rear wing slot gaps.

Pushed on what he was seeing in other teams, Stella said: “I will not be precise, because I would be disclosing information that I think fits within a confidentiality range.

“For some reasons, this slot gap seems to have become something that dominates F1. There’s many ways in which other cars are exploiting aerodynamic pressure on surfaces — actually, based on our analysis, some of them are just quite a lot more effective.

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

“But we do trust the FIA. They are very competent people from a technical point of view.

“To be honest, when we have conversations with them, not only do we see that they understand mechanisms, but they also understand what is going on with our competitors.

“They always seem to be pretty equipped in terms of understanding whether some of the tests are suitable — to limit some mechanisms or ways of aerodynamic pressure.

“I think we are in good hands from a policy point of view, with the FIA, and I think we should have all parties — teams, journalists, everyone — [give] a little bit more respect for the FIA and their technical department, because they do a very good job.

“It’s not a simple job. Sometimes we should praise what they do. And I don’t see this being done very much.”

Read Also:



Source link

Sainz fined for crossing track after Singapore Q3 crash


Carlos Sainz has been given a €25,000 fine with half of it suspended for crossing a live Formula 1 track after his crash in qualifying for the Singapore Grand Prix.

The Ferrari driver slammed into the barriers at the final corner of the Marina Bay track with just over eight minutes of Q3 remaining.

Sainz was unhurt in the accident, climbed from his stricken car and, with the session red-flagged, walked across the track to reach the pitlane entrance.

Following an FIA stewards investigation, the Spaniard was given a €25,000 fine, €12,500 of which has been suspended for the rest of the season on the condition there is no similar incident.

Speaking about the incident, which means he is set to start tenth for tomorrow’s Grand Prix, Sainz admitted it had been his mistake.

Read Also:

«I had a bit of a strange exit in there,» he said. «Had to let a lot of cars through opening my lap and my tyres were just a lot colder than I thought they would be.

«I misjudged the grip going on the bump on [Turn] 17, and it completely snapped on me. Driver mistake.

«I underestimated the grip I would get launching the lap — I was already under pressure with another car coming, and I knew that launching the lap I was already going to be slower because of approaching the last corner so slow.

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24, climbs out of his damaged car after a crash in Qualifying

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24, climbs out of his damaged car after a crash in Qualifying

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

«So it meant that I tried to do something that was not enough grip to do.»

It was a similar incident to the Qatar Grand Prix last year when Lewis Hamilton was fined €50,000 — half of which was suspended for the rest of the year — and served with a reprimand.

Hamilton had tangled with George Russell into Turn 1 at the start of the Losail race, the contact breaking his right-rear wheel and ending his race.

While the race was placed under the safety car, Hamilton crossed the live circuit from the outside of Turn 1 to the pitlane, just seconds before Russell emerged from the pits.

On that occasion, the FIA stewards summoned Hamilton, who apologised before the governing body issued their verdict, saying: «During the hearing the driver of Car 44 was very apologetic and realised that the situation could have been very dangerous for him as well as the drivers approaching.

«The Stewards reinforced the fact that crossing a live track can cause extremely dangerous situations and the drivers have to be very cautious about it.»

Read Also:

However, a week after the race, the FIA reopened its investigation because it felt the incident was much more serious than perhaps originally thought.

There was a feeling that penalties for drivers crossing a live track should be much greater for it felt that it was sending the wrong impression on younger drivers.

The FIA stewards explained Sainz’s penalty was half of Hamilton’s from last year because the Spaniard’s offence was during a red flag while the British driver’s was during a safety car period in a race.

Sainz also argued he was beyond pit entry, which was taken as mitigating circumstances.



Source link

Sainz faces punishment for crossing track after Singapore Q3 crash


Carlos Sainz is under investigation for walking across a live Formula 1 track after his crash in qualifying for the Singapore Grand Prix.

The Ferrari driver slammed into the barriers at the final corner of the Marina Bay track with just over eight minutes of the session remaining.

Sainz, who was unhurt from the accident, climbed from his stricken car and, with the session red-flagged, walked across the track to reach the pitlane entrance.

However, he will now be hauled to the stewards for crossing the track on foot while vehicles were deployed to repair the damage and recover his Ferrari.

It was a similar incident to the Qatar Grand Prix last year when Lewis Hamilton was fined €50,000 — half of which was suspended for the rest of the year — and served with a reprimand.

Hamilton had tangled with George Russell into Turn 1 at the start of the Losail race broke his right-rear wheel and ended his race.

Singapore GP

Singapore GP

While the race was placed under the safety car, Hamilton crossed the live circuit from the outside of Turn 1 to the pitlane, just seconds before Russell emerged from the pits.

On that occasion, the FIA stewards summoned Hamilton, who apologised before the governing body issued their verdict, saying: «During the hearing the driver of Car 44 was very apologetic and realised that the situation could have been very dangerous for him as well as the drivers approaching.

«The Stewards reinforced the fact that crossing a live track can cause extremely dangerous situations and the drivers have to be very cautious about it.»

However, a week after the race, the FIA reopened its investigation because it felt the incident was much more serious than perhaps originally thought.

There was a feeling that penalties for drivers crossing a live track should be much greater for it felt that it was sending the wrong impression on younger drivers.

More to follow…

Read Also:



Source link

What we learned from Friday practice at the 2024 Singapore Grand Prix


If Friday practice is anything to go by, then the Singapore Grand Prix promises to develop into a closely fought weekend between Ferrari and McLaren. Charles Leclerc and Lando Norris were separated by little in each of the two sessions, chalking up one session each at the others’ expense by less than a tenth.

As ever in Singapore, there was only one truly representative session; the night-time FP2 is the closest of the three practice hours in terms of track conditions and temperature, giving its equivalent timing to the qualifying and race phases of the weekend. Naturally, the teams wanted to use that opportunity to get some running in — and hope that none of their drivers suffered an ignominious tangle with the barriers.

Elsewhere, the likes of Red Bull and Mercedes dealt with two hours of set-up struggles, while the likes of RB surprised with consistent one-lap pace among the top half of the field. As ever, it’s shaping up to be an intriguing weekend at Marina Bay.

The story of the day

Leclerc delivered the first punch of the weekend with the fastest time in FP1, albeit with a scant 0.076-second advantage over Norris, after managing to improve over three timed laps on a single set of soft tyres. A dusty track surface prompted the majority of the field to conduct their early-session exploration runs on the hards and mediums, although the track evolution was characteristically rapid for a street circuit as the road surface began to take on rubber.

Norris had occupied the top of the leaderboard in the opening soft-tyre runs, but Leclerc was able to overturn that to hint that McLaren and Ferrari may yet do battle again at the front — as they had a week ago in Baku.

FP2 further reinforced that, as Norris outpaced Leclerc by an even more slender 0.058 seconds as the two proved to be a cut above the rest of the order. Their gap to the third-fastest Carlos Sainz stood at over half a second, as the Spaniard put this down to a series of issues with his brakes that sapped at his confidence in the lower-speed corners.

Norris edged Leclerc to top second practice by a tiny margin, pointing to a very tight qualifying battle to come

Norris edged Leclerc to top second practice by a tiny margin, pointing to a very tight qualifying battle to come

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

And, while Norris looked rapid on track, he too suffered a few wayward moments; he noted that he «hit the wall pretty hard» at Turn 3, at the start of his longer runs. Leclerc felt that he’d done a similar move at Turn 14, as the closeness of the barriers started to keep the drivers’ growing confidence in check.

Rather than matching Norris for pace, Azerbaijan winner Oscar Piastri was struggling akin to Sainz with his initial set-up choices; the Australian went wide at Turn 7and brushed his right-rear at Turn 17, and could only manage a time 0.747s shy of Norris overall.

In the meantime, Red Bull was perhaps wary of a repeat of 2023, where its bid to win every race of the season came unstuck at the Singapore round with a sudden drop in pace. And the Milton Keynes squad did not look entirely at home this time around either, as Sergio Perez was the best of the RB20s with his run to the eighth-fastest time in FP2. Max Verstappen, for his part, was all the way down in 15th as the flag fell on Friday’s running.

«Charles is only like 0.08 seconds behind. So I was hoping to have a much bigger gap than what I had, honestly, which means they’re quick» Lando Norris

“On Max’s car, nothing is working,» Red Bull adviser Helmut Marko said of the difficulties faced so far. «On both the soft and the hard tyre he doesn’t get any grip and he doesn’t have any balance at all.”

Verstappen concurred, stating that «we didn’t have the grip that we would have liked on the tyres, so I felt like we were sliding a lot more than usual,” he said. “This caused us particular issues in FP2, which wasn’t really a positive session for us.» He reckoned that this was less of an issue with Red Bull’s usual bugbear of kerb riding, but rather simply a matter of dialling in mechanical grip overall. Perhaps the two are linked, with a set-up choice that eases the limitations of the car in bumps but has less grip overall, but it’s impossible to say without insider knowledge.

Lewis Hamilton faced similar issues, admitting that Mercedes felt «lost» with its set-up choices — despite heavy revisions between FP1 and FP2. That said, George Russell was marginally more optimistic and targeted the gap behind the Ferraris and McLarens for his weekend progress, although the waywardness of his own car was evident in a late-FP2 tangle with the wall at Turn 8. This knocked his front wing off, but caused little other damage.

Despite his late-FP2 wall contact, Russell pointed to Mercedes being a strong bet behind McLaren and Ferrari

Despite his late-FP2 wall contact, Russell pointed to Mercedes being a strong bet behind McLaren and Ferrari

Photo by: Lionel Ng / Motorsport Images

McLaren versus Ferrari — but who’s got the race pace?

At this stage, it’s hard to fully gauge where each of the top four teams will shake out as they carried out different tyre work during FP2. Assuming all three tyres will be used in the race, then Ferrari, and particularly Leclerc, looks like a strong bet given his strength on the medium tyre. The Monegasque set the fastest average race run across the session and produced it across a 10-lap stretch on the C4 to beat Norris’ eight-lap soft-tyre run by about a tenth per lap.

But one must be mindful that Norris’ tyres suffered a bigger drop-off over the stint versus Leclerc. Thus, again, the two should be evenly matched on a fresh set of the yellow-walled tyres; Norris’ red-walled Pirellis had already been pushed through two qualifying laps at that stage and thus were past their peak.

«I’m feeling good,» Norris said after the session. «It was also a nice lap. I think we’re doing what we expect, to be up with the front and to be up with Ferrari. Charles is only like 0.08 seconds behind. So I was hoping to have a much bigger gap than what I had, honestly, which means they’re quick; means Ferrari are very, very fast. But I think it’s going well so far.»

Pos

Driver

Team

Av. time

Laps

Tyre

1

Leclerc

Ferrari

1m37.369s

10

M

2

Norris

McLaren

1m37.458s

8

S

3

Piastri

McLaren

1m37.658s

10

M

4

Hamilton

Mercedes

1m37.859s

9

M

5

Russell

Mercedes

1m37.862s

9

M

6

Verstappen

Red Bull

1m37.868s

7

H

7

Sainz

Ferrari

1m37.913s

11

M

8

Perez

Red Bull

1m38.632s

9

H

Piastri showed up well on the medium, albeit about 0.3s a lap slower than Leclerc. The Australian admitted that he struggled to find a rhythm throughout the session, stating that «the pace in the car looks strong, I’ve just not really been able to unlock it that well. We’re still somewhere towards the front, but obviously the gap to Lando is bigger than what it should be.»

The aforementioned lack of comfort can also go some way to explaining Sainz’s lowly stint time relative to Leclerc, but the key reason is that Sainz did not use DRS on his long-run laps while Leclerc did on select tours. This yielded an almost 15km/h (9.3mph) speed difference on the run between Turns 5 and 7, and also marked differences in velocity across the other three DRS zones. But this only affected some of the laps in the data, as Leclerc did not use it all the time.

While Verstappen's single-lap speed was lacking, his race pace showed signs of recovery for Red Bull in Singapore

While Verstappen’s single-lap speed was lacking, his race pace showed signs of recovery for Red Bull in Singapore

Photo by: Alastair Staley / Motorsport Images

The Mercedes duo was ultimately not far away from Piastri, although it suggests that there’s more time in the bag if both drivers can be made to feel more comfortable; the nine-lap stints on the medium-grade tyre were almost identical for both Hamilton and Russell.

On the hard tyre, Verstappen was also in the mix, and so his overall race runs must be of some comfort to Red Bull. But this was not entirely where the team had struggled last season, as Verstappen was able to make ground through the race; qualifying position will likely be the main mitigating factor for him. Should he be able to find a better balance for the Saturday night session, then Verstappen should have a decent chance to challenge in the upper reaches of the points. If not, and he suffers a Q2 exit like last year, then he’ll have his work cut out.

«They use this high pressure water jet treatment on the asphalt, and so I’m not expecting any surprise from the track» Mario Isola

Going into Saturday, the track can be expected to continue to evolve, as the streets become more saturated with the Pirelli tyres running over it. «The grip is still good. It’s quite homogeneous,» Pirelli chief Mario Isola explained during the gap between sessions. «They use this high pressure water jet treatment on the asphalt, and so I’m not expecting any surprise from the track. We have seen in FP1 that the level of grip is good.»

A little overnight dust may have a part to play, but that will scarcely make much difference as FP3 continues to pass by and the drivers gather more confidence on the challenging course around Marina Bay. And, of course, the heat will start to affect the drivers — perhaps not so much during the practice and qualifying sessions, but during the punishing 62-lap affair in humid conditions. If they pop a teabag in their drinks bottle, it might be a little more palatable…

Who will succeed in this year's Singapore sizzler?

Who will succeed in this year’s Singapore sizzler?

Photo by: Lionel Ng / Motorsport Images



Source link

F1 Singapore GP qualifying — Start time, how to watch & more


Lando Norris topped the Friday practice times for McLaren ahead of the Formula 1 Singapore Grand Prix. Here’s how and when to watch qualifying.

The British driver led FP2 by just 0.058s over Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc, with the pair comfortably clear of the rest of the field during the qualifying simulation runs on Friday night.

Carlos Sainz slotted into third in the sister Ferrari, 12 months on from winning the Singapore GP, with RB enjoying an impressive day with Yuki Tsunoda fourth and under-pressure Daniel Ricciardo sixth – as the Australian is rumoured to be replaced by Liam Lawson for the remainder of the season.

Azerbaijan GP winner Oscar Piastri split the RBs in fifth, with George Russell in seventh for Mercedes who saw his day ended prematurely when he nosed his car into the wall at Turn 8 in the closing minutes of FP2.

It was a difficult Friday for Red Bull with Sergio Perez eighth and Max Verstappen 15th on the FP2 times – while the Dutch driver was given a public interest work punishment by the FIA stewards for swearing in the Thursday press conference.

Meanwhile, McLaren will modify its rear wing after being asked by the FIA in the wake of its ‘mini-DRS’ controversy. 

What time does qualifying start for the F1 Singapore Grand Prix?

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

Qualifying for the Singapore GP starts at 9:00pm local time (2:00pm BST), using the regular Q1, Q2 and Q3 knockout session format.

Date: Saturday 20 September 2024
Start time: 9:00pm local time – 2:00pm BST

How can I watch Formula 1?

In the United Kingdom Formula 1 is broadcast live on Sky Sports, except for the British GP which is shown live on both Sky Sports and Channel 4, with highlights shown on Channel 4 several hours after the race has finished. Live streaming through NOW is also available in the UK.

Sky Sports F1, which broadcasts the F1 races, can be added as part of the Sky Sports channels which costs £18 a month for new customers. Sky Sports can also be accessed through NOW with a one-off day payment of £11.99p or a month membership of £34.99p per month.

How can I watch F1 Singapore GP qualifying?

In the United Kingdom every F1 practice, qualifying and race is broadcast live on Sky Sports F1 and Sky Sports Main Event, with Singapore GP qualifying coverage starting at 1pm BST on Sky Sports F1 and at 2pm on Sky Sports Main Event.

Channel: Sky Sports F1, Sky Sports Main Event
Start time: 1pm BST Saturday 20 September 2024, 2pm BST Saturday 20 September 2024

Autosport will be running a live text coverage of qualifying.

When can I watch the highlights of F1 Singapore GP qualifying?

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images

In the United Kingdom Channel 4 is broadcasting highlights of qualifying for the Singapore GP at 6:55pm BST on Saturday evening. The full programme will run for 90 minutes, covering both qualifying and wrapping up the major talking points of the race weekend so far.

For the entire 2024 F1 season, Channel 4 will broadcast highlights of every qualifying and race of each event. The highlights will also be available on Channel 4’s on demand catch up services.

Channel: Channel 4
Start time: 6:55pm BST Saturday 20 September 2024

Will F1 Singapore GP qualifying be on the radio?

Live radio coverage of every practice, qualifying and race for the 2024 F1 season will be available on the BBC Radio 5 Live, BBC 5 Live Sports Extra or via the BBC Sport website.

Coverage of Singapore GP qualifying will start at 2:00pm BST on the BBC Sport website and the BBC Sounds app.

What’s the weather forecast for qualifying in Singapore?

Cloudy and warm conditions are forecast for Saturday night for the start of qualifying in Singapore. The temperature is set to be 29 degrees Celsius at the start of qualifying, with a low chance of rain and low winds.

F1 Singapore GP FP2 Results

F1 Singapore GP FP1 Results



Source link

McLaren asked by FIA to modify rear wing after ‘mini-DRS’ controversy



McLaren has been asked by the FIA to modify its rear wing design in the wake of the controversy over its ‘mini-DRS’, Autosport has learned.

With rival teams questioning the legality of the McLaren rear wing after the Azerbaijan Grand Prix, as it appeared to rotate back at speed to open up the slot gap, the FIA has been carefully looking at its design.

Although there is no doubt that the wing fully complies with the current regulations, and passes all the static tests, it is understood that the FIA has requested for changes to be made.

More to follow



Source link

Ricciardo can reflect on F1 career «anyone could dream of»


Max Verstappen has praised Daniel Ricciardo as the Australian prepares to learn whether he will remain in Formula 1 for next season.

Red Bull is expected to make a decision on whether Ricciardo, 35, will be retained by its sister team RB for next season and continue to partner Yuki Tsunoda.

Liam Lawson is also in contention for the seat after he impressed filling in for Ricciardo last year when he was ruled out with a broken wrist.

Ricciardo is understood to have the full support of Red Bull boss Christian Horner. However, the Australian has been unable to repay that faith with performances on track.

When asked about the predicament Ricciardo now faces, Verstappen gave a cryptic response that sounded vaguely like a goodbye speech for the eight-time GP winner.

Speaking on Thursday in Singapore about the driver he spent three years racing alongside at Red Bull in 2016-18, he said: «Daniel is a great guy, I think he has proven himself as a great Formula 1 driver.

«He’s a friend of mine. And being in this kind of position is never nice.

«But on the other end, I don’t think he has to feel sorry for himself.

Daniel Ricciardo, Visa Cash App RB F1 Team

Daniel Ricciardo, Visa Cash App RB F1 Team

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

«Sometimes things maybe don’t work out the way you want them in certain stages of your career, but you still have achieved a lot more than anyone could ever dream of in their lives.

«So even if this is, let’s say, the last race or whatever, you can still look back at something amazing that not many people can achieve and do something else.

«I mean, why not? [There are] many more race series or not. Maybe just chill back at the farm, have a lot of fun.

«He’s a great guy. So for me, it doesn’t really matter or not if you deserve to be here. A lot of people deserve to be here.

«Some don’t deserve to be here, that’s life in all kinds of sports. It’s how it goes.»

Read Also:

Meanwhile Ricciardo has said he has been unable to show his true potential in races since he returned to F1 with RB after being let go after a disappointing run at McLaren.

He said: «I don’t wish to be in the middle, for sure. But obviously, I look back at my year and yes, if you asked me in January, ‘how do you think a year is going to go?’ I would have said, ‘I expect it to have gone better than this’.

«But it’s not through, lack of anything really, I really felt like I put everything into it this year.

Daniel Ricciardo, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Daniel Ricciardo, RB F1 Team VCARB 01

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

«And, okay, sometimes the result doesn’t come out the way you wish or hope or doesn’t always translate to maybe the effort you put in. But that’s sport.

«I’m always going to look myself in the mirror and try to be as critical as possible. And I wish I’d found some more consistency this year.

«But honestly, getting back into the sport after the McLaren period, I was more just looking for speed and proving to myself that I could still run at the front with these guys.

«And there have been moments of that.

«Obviously, I wish I could produce it every weekend, but if I take a little bit of heat away from myself, I think it’s also hard to do in a midfield battle.»



Source link

Ferrari caught out by McLaren’s top speed with «controversial» rear wing


Charles Leclerc says Ferrari was caught out by McLaren’s top speed in the Azerbaijan Grand Prix, as he labelled his rival’s flexible rear wing a «controversial» design.

The Monegasque driver was locked in a race-long battle with Oscar Piastri for victory in Baku last weekend, but his hopes of a triumph were dashed just a few laps from home when his rear tyres faded.

Having reflected on the factors that cost him the win, he admits that one of the most important was the fact that, after losing the lead to Piastri, he and Ferrari never anticipated the McLaren’s top speed to be as high as it was – especially when DRS was not open.

That is why Leclerc did not choose to aggressively defend the front spot when Piastri made his critical pass of him on lap 20.

«It was a good move,» he said. «However, as I said when I saw him going on the inside, I knew he was there. I knew it was an opportunity for him to get past, but I was not more worried than that.

«I knew that he could take the lead, but I also knew that I was at the beginning of the warm-up of the tyres, and I didn’t want to push on them, so I didn’t want to start going stupid in terms of how defensive I would get.

«However, I was wrong because obviously his straightline speed was really, really strong and after that I never had the opportunity to pass again.»

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38, Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38, Charles Leclerc, Ferrari SF-24

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

He added: «I don’t think on the attacks there was anything better I could have done. I could have done a better job defending. However, again, I didn’t know how quick they were on the straights after that.»

The repeated reference to Piastri’s straightline speed comes amid great intrigue over the behaviour of McLaren’s rear wing in the Baku event.

As was revealed by rearward-facing onboard cameras, the upper element of the McLaren rear wing appeared to flex back on the straights and open up the slot gap to help reduce drag. It quickly earned the tag of acting like a ‘mini DRS’.

Its design has prompted some rival teams to seek clarification on its design to better understand what the limits are in terms of flexible bodywork.

Ahead of the Singapore GP, the FIA has said it is examining evidence it obtained on the wing from Baku to decide if it needs to make any response.

Read Also:

It is understood that Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur has some strong opinions on the matter, and he is due to speak at an official FIA press conference at the Singapore GP on Friday.

Leclerc said the team had discussed the matter internally, although he did not wish to get too drawn into the matter.

«Yes, [there is] definitely a dialogue that we’ve already had,» he said, when asked for his thoughts on the wing.

«I mean, I think Fred will go on that matter a bit more into detail, but from what I’ve been told, it’s controversial to say the least. So, yeah. I’ll leave that here and I’ll let Fred comment on it a bit further.»



Source link

FIA considering action over flexi rear wings after McLaren’s ‘mini-DRS’ intrigue


The FIA is pondering whether to take action about potential flexing rear wings in Formula 1 in the wake of the controversy caused by McLaren’s ‘mini-DRS.’

The behaviour of the McLaren rear wing at last weekend’s Azerbaijan Grand Prix came under the spotlight after footage of its behaviour emerged from television coverage of its rearward facing onboard camera.

The top element of the rear wing was observed to rotate back at speed on the straights, and appeared to be designed in such a way that this change in attitude opened up the slot gap.

This will help reduce drag and boost top speed, and it quickly earned the nickname of being like a ‘mini-DRS.’

The McLaren design immediately came under the spotlight from rival squads and it prompted some calls for clarification about what is and is not allowed in terms of the flexibility of rear wings.

Ahead of this weekend’s Singapore Grand Prix, motor racing’s governing body has revealed it is now reviewing evidence it has gathered from Baku to decide if any action needs to be taken.

A statement from the FIA said: “The FIA is closely monitoring the flexibility of bodywork on all cars and reserves the right to request teams to make modifications at any point during the season.

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38 rear wing, Azerbaijan GP

Oscar Piastri, McLaren MCL38 rear wing, Azerbaijan GP

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

“However, if a team successfully passes all deflection tests and adheres to the regulations and technical directives, they are deemed to be in full compliance, and no further action will be taken.

“The FIA is currently reviewing data and any additional evidence that has emerged from the Baku GP and is considering any mitigating measures for future implementation.

“This is part of the standard process when scrutineering technical legality, and the FIA retains the authority to introduce regulatory changes during the season if required.”

With the McLaren rear wing having passed the mandatory deflection tests in the pit lane, there is no question that it fully conforms to the current regulations.

However, the debate is about whether deliberately designing a wing to flex in the manner it does goes against FIA guidance in terms of what is deemed to be acceptable flexing.

In a still current technical directive (TD34) from the FIA that offers guidelines on flexing wings, it is made that clear that certain behaviours will not be tolerated even if wings are passed as legal in the pits.

PLUS: How F1 moved away from subjective scrutineering on issues of flexing

In the note, the FIA says that it does not consider legal “designs whose structural characteristics are altered by secondary parameters, so as to produce (whilst running at the track) a different deflection characteristic than when stationary during the FIA checks. Examples of secondary parameters could be temperature, aerodynamic load etc.”

Rival team bosses are keeping a close eye on the McLaren developments, amid a push for greater clarity on what is deemed to be acceptable.

McLaren MCL38 technical detail

McLaren MCL38 technical detail

Photo by: Jon Noble

One team boss told Autosport: “Aero elasticity has been a factor for many, many years now, and even if a wing passes the FIA test the regulations remain very clear — the component cannot be designed to flex.

“We rely on the FIA to say, okay, what are the boundaries of that? Of course, everything will flex to a certain degree, but what is acceptable and what is not?

“We’re starting to see extremities be exploited again, and I think it’s down to the FIA to decide, is that okay, in which case everybody will pile in or, as per the regulation, the way it’s written, does that comply?

“There is a large scatter of who’s doing what now, obviously with a lot of interest in the McLaren rear wing after Baku and there is performance in it – of course there is.

“That is why everyone is chasing it. But it’s just knowing what is reasonable, and what’s taking the piss.”

But while McLaren is at the centre of the current intrigue, it is understood to not be the only team whose rear wing design is coming under the spotlight because of either flexing on the straight of the opening of the slot gap.

McLaren’s rear wing was covered up as the car was being assembled in the Singapore pit lane on Thursday, but this is understood to be related to a new livery launch taking place later in the day.

Watch: McLaren In Charge — F1 Azerbaijan GP Analysis



Source link