Метка: wec

BMW rules out using evo jokers on LMDh car before end of 2024


BMW doesn’t plan to use evo jokers on its LMDh car before the end of the World Endurance Championship and IMSA SportsCar Championship seasons, motorsport boss Andreas Roos says.

The BMW M8 Hybrid V8 is currently in its second year of operation after making a debut at the Daytona 24 Hours in January 2023 alongside other LMDh contenders from Cadillac, Acura and Porsche.

But the Dallara LMP2-based contender has only received limited success so far in IMSA, with last year’s Watkins Glen round the only event where it scored a victory in the new GTP class.

The Bavarian marque’s WEC programme with WRT, meanwhile, is still in its infancy, having expanded to the world championship at the start of 2024 after devoting all its resources last year to the IMSA project with Rahal Letterman Lanigan.

All manufacturers are allowed to use up to five development jokers over the lifespan of an LMDh or a LMH car, which can be utilised to bring performance updates with hardware changes.

Peugeot became the first manufacturer to take advantage of the system to bring an updated version of the 9X8 LMH at Imola in April, while Porsche also came close to upgrading the engine of its 963 that would have «probably» counted towards one of its jokers.

But speaking ahead of this month’s Le Mans 24 Hours, where neither BMW was classified, Roos made it clear that the M Hybrid V8 will see out the season in its current specification.

Asked if there are any plans to take a joker in 2024, he said: “No, not at the moment.

Andreas Roos, Head of BMW Motorsport M

Andreas Roos, Head of BMW Motorsport M

Photo by: BMW

“For sure we investigate and check maybe which areas we could look into to improve or where you think.

“But there’s nothing happening at the moment yet that we say we need a joker for this or that.

“For sure we will check now, especially when we have our first 24-hour race here under the belt if there are areas where we feel we have to do something.

“But generally I’m still of the opinion that the cars are quite close together.”

Roos also feels that introducing regular upgrades could make it harder for series regulators to devise an accurate Balance of Performance system, as it relies on on-track data to equalise the speed of different cars.

“There is a BoP behind which should be able to manage to bring the cars even closer together and this should be the approach to have to balance the field,” he said.

“If everybody uses jokers and develops the car, then first of all it’s an expensive topic and it also makes it difficult again to have BoP in the right window because then you start all over again.

“We all see also in other championships that as long as cars and things are quite stable, it’s much easier to bring the cars and to adjust them to the same window.

“So we clearly need to look into if there are some topics where you say, ‘okay it’s a topic where you really have to look into and maybe use a joker’ or is there other ways let’s say to equalise this.”

#24 BMW Team RLL BMW M Hybrid V8: Jesse Krohn, Philipp Eng

#24 BMW Team RLL BMW M Hybrid V8: Jesse Krohn, Philipp Eng

Photo by: Michael L. Levitt / Motorsport Images

Pressed further if any joker upgrades are on the cards by the end of the year, he said: “No, nothing planned at the moment.”

Roos has previously spoken about the possibility of BMW introducing a third car at Le Mans next year, with the additional entry likely to be managed by its IMSA partner RLL.

Porsche and Cadillac have already taken advantage of their North American crews to run three cars at Le Mans in 2023 and ‘24, giving them a numerical advantage over rival manufacturers.

Roos continues to believe in the benefits of having an expanded presence at La Sarthe, but reiterated that it has to make sense from an operational standpoint.

“I always said it’s nice to have three cars at Le Mans because in the past I often said one car has a technical issue, one car has a crash and the third car is winning. But we have to see,» he said.

“It’s always nice to have more cars on the grid, but it also has to fit together totally in terms of how you run.

“It’s not just having a car on the grid, if we want to do it and if we want to have a competitive third car on the grid.”

Read Also:



Source link

Vanthoor claims Kubica pushed him off on purpose in race-ending Le Mans clash


BMW driver Dries Vanthoor believes AF Corse Ferrari rival Robert Kubica deliberately pushed him off the track while trying to lap him during the night at last weekend’s Le Mans 24 Hours.

Vanthoor has expressed his disappointment at what he believes was a lack of respect from the one-time Formula 1 race winner after he was sent to the medical centre for check-ups due to the sizeable impact from their collision.

Speaking on the ‘Over the limit’ podcast he jointly hosts with brother and Porsche factory driver Laurens, Vanthoor said: «I personally think yes, that he did it on purpose because the way he tried to defend himself was wrong.

«The way he did not care about me after the crash, or did not show any respect or just human being to me, also showed to me that it was on purpose. Just not caring, just not coming to see how I was doing.

«I had a small concussion, I have a little thing on my left foot. Not doing any effort to even send a text and know how I am doing [was disappointing].

 

«If I had a crash with someone and I would know he is hurt or he has to go the medical centre, you would just be respectful. I know we are racing and we want to race hard. This was just very unrespectful [sic] and for me not done and something you don’t do in racing. It’s completely wrong.

«You should show respect. We all want to be safe, it’s the number one priority of every organiser, FIA, ACO, SRO. It’s the number one priority in racing.

«Even if he was pissed off, even if it was my own mistake of the crash, which let’s be completely straight, it wasn’t at all, I would have still said something.

#83 AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Robert Kubica, Robert Shwartzman, Yifei Ye

#83 AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Robert Kubica, Robert Shwartzman, Yifei Ye

Photo by: Alexander Trienitz

«I would have said, ‘sorry mate, I turned into you’. But he just turned to the right like nobody was there and I was driving there, driving completely straight.»

Vanthoor was trying to stay on the lead lap in his WRT-run #15 BMW M Hybrid V8 in the ninth hour, having just switched from wet tyres to slicks, when he encountered the race-leading #83 satellite Ferrari 499P of Kubica on the Mulsanne straight.

The Belgian driver missed the second chicane on cold tyres and had to take to the escape road before rejoining the track, putting him in the thick of the fight with Kubica — who previously raced for WRT in LMP2 — and the #92 Porsche GT3 car.

But as the ex-F1 driver tried to jump both approaching the braking zone for the right-hand Mulsanne Corner, he jinked to the right and clipped Vanthoor’s BMW, pitching him head-on into the barriers on the left-hand side of the road.

Such was the intensity of the impact that the car bounced back and skated to the inside side of the track, before coming to a rest with heavy damage to the front-end.

The collision between Vanthoor and Kubica marked a premature end to BMW’s race, with the sister #20 car having already been sent back to the garage following a separate accident when Robin Frijns crashed at the Ford Chicane.

The stewards deemed Kubica guilty of causing the crash and handed him a 30-second stop/go penalty, a sanction that was described as too lenient by WRT boss Vincent Vosse.

Explaining the moments in the lead-up to the crash, Vanthoor said: «Going into the second chicane, there was a Ford just in front of us.

«So I was like, f**k I need to get by this Ford. So we braked for the corner, just behind the Ford. I braked at the same point as him.

#15 BMW M Team WRT BMW M Hybrid V8: Dries Vanthoor, Raffaele Marciello, Marco Wittmann

#15 BMW M Team WRT BMW M Hybrid V8: Dries Vanthoor, Raffaele Marciello, Marco Wittmann

Photo by: BMW AG

«But I was like ‘I need to get this Ford between us [so] I don’t have the blue flag’ because he needs to pass the Ford first. But I was on the inside on cold tyres on the wet part of the track and I didn’t make the corner.

«I went on power again [after the chicane] and he had a run on me again.

«I tried to use the Porsche to slow him down, but it didn’t work because he had such a run, so I was fair in that way to make the space and let go the Porsche by to not make it dangerous.

«And unfortunately, he decided to make it more dangerous and pushed me off the road. That was it actually.»

Vanthoor revealed that he received a lot of hate messages in the aftermath of the accident on social media, with many accusing him of not respecting blue flags when a faster Ferrari was on his tail.

While he did admit that he had been instructed to do everything it took to stay on the lead lap to remain in the hunt for a top result, the 2017 GTE Am class winner at Le Mans claimed he had enough time under the regulations before letting Kubica through.

«They [BMW] told me it’s going to be crucial to keep the car behind to stay on the lead lap, because when you are not on the lead lap, unless there is a safety car then it’s very difficult to get your lap back,» he added.

«When you are lap down, it’s very very tough to impossible to do something.

«For all the haters who said ‘why you exceeded blue flags’, I saw the replays and I saw there was a blue flag. But when you are in a battle or in the moment I honestly did not see [it].

#15 BMW M Team WRT BMW M Hybrid V8: Dries Vanthoor

#15 BMW M Team WRT BMW M Hybrid V8: Dries Vanthoor

Photo by: BMW AG

«And even if I had seen it, I wouldn’t have done anything because the rule is in WEC you have one sector or two time to let somebody go for blue flags.

«Maybe I fully did not respect the rule, but the rule said I had two sectors to let somebody by. I didn’t try to let him by, but people can stop saying this because it’s bullshit.»

On his part, Kubica denied that he caused the incident on purpose, stating that any attempt at touching another car at high speed would have jeopardised his own chances for victory.

«Firstly, I’m not the sort of person who would swerve into another car at 300kph, leading in a race and with 18 hours to go,» he said in an interview with Mikolaj Sokol for Motowizja.

«By swerving into him I would be the one risking ending up in the barriers on the right. That’s the first argument.

«The second argument is that if it had been me [causing the collision], my car should have moved much earlier, not just after contact. And that was not the case.»

Kubica also hit back at Vanthoor for not respecting blue flags or letting him by easily when he was about to drop a lap down, saying: «I come from a championship where you have respect for other drivers, especially the leaders, especially when you are being lapped.

«On the other hand, there are also championships, and apparently that’s what Dries races in, where the blue flags and the rules and regulations don’t give a damn [about them]. I’m fortunate enough to have grown up in those first championships.

#83 AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Robert Kubica

#83 AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Robert Kubica

Photo by: Marc Fleury

«However, there are drivers in slower cars who want to prove themselves at all costs. I don’t know why.

«I know Dries has been instructed to stay on the lead lap at all costs. Well if someone tells me to jump from the eighth floor, for example, an engineer, I won’t do it. But apparently there are drivers who would do it.»

The #83 499P Kubica shared with Ferrari factory drivers Robert Shwartzman and Yifei Ye retired with just over three hours to run due to hybrid issues.

You can listen in full to the Vanthoor brothers’ podcast here.

Additional reporting by Tomasz Kalinski

Watch: 2024 Le Mans 24hrs Analysis — Ferrari Rain Supreme



Source link

Ferrari eyes joker upgrades to Le Mans-winning 499P


Ferrari is eyeing a performance upgrade of its Le Mans 24 Hours-winning 499P that could come on stream before the end of this year’s World Endurance Championship. 

Ferdinando Cannizzo, technical director of Ferrari’s sportscar operations, stated before and after it retained its Le Mans crown last weekend that the Italian manufacturer is looking to exploit the evo joker rules that govern car development in the Hypercar class. 

He explained that no timeline has been set for what remains an unspecified revision to the Ferrari Le Mans Hypercar and that it might come as late as the start of next season. 

“We are thinking about introducing a joker this year or next year,” Cannizzo said between the Le Mans Test Day and the start of running during race week. 

“We haven’t made any decision yet, but we are further developing this joker because we’ve identified areas for improvement.”

After the race, Cannizzo conceded that Toyota, with which it battled for the victory last weekend, was the faster car in wet and mixed conditions but that the Ferrari “was more competitive in the dry”. 

“We know the areas we would like to improve,” he said. 

“We need to be much more competitive in all conditions —  this race is a perfect lesson for us.”

Race winner #50 Ferrari AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Antonio Fuoco, Miguel Molina, Nicklas Nielsen

Race winner #50 Ferrari AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Antonio Fuoco, Miguel Molina, Nicklas Nielsen

Photo by: Emanuele Clivati | AG Photo

Ferrari has so far yet to use one of the five evo jokers performance upgrades allowed to a manufacturer over the lifespan of a LMH or LMDh prototype. 

It stated at the end of last year that it was evaluating introducing one for 2024, but confirmed ahead of the season-opener in Qatar in March that it had opted against bringing one on stream. 

Cannizzo stated pre-Qatar that it was important that Ferrari first “exploit the potential of the base car”  

“Before we apply for any jokers we want to understand the ultimate performance of our car,” he said.

A manufacturer must apply to the WEC rule makers, the FIA and the Automobile Club de l’Ouest, to be able to take one of the evo jokers available to it. 

The take-up of evo jokers is not in the public domain and is not shared by the FIA and the ACO with the manufacturers. 

It is not known, for example, how many were used by Toyota for its revisions to the GR010 HYBRID LMH for the 2022 and ’23 seasons or by Peugeot for its reworking of the 9X8 LMH for ’23 and then this year.

Read Also:



Source link

Rules extension boosts McLaren’s outright Le Mans ambitions


McLaren’s ambitions to repeat its 1995 Le Mans 24 Hours victory remain on track and have been given a boost by the extension of the current prototype regulations until 2029.

Zak Brown, boss of McLaren Racing, has stated that an entry into either the Hypercar or GTP classes of the respective World Endurance Championship and the IMSA SportsCar Championships is “more when than if”.

He explained that the decision to extend the lifecycle of Le Mans Hypercar and LMDh regulations by two years beyond 2027 announced last week has given McLaren “more breathing space”.

“Costs in all motorsport are critically important and I think the extension definitely helps our business model that we have laid out internally,” said Brown, who has spoken openly about McLaren’s aspirations at the the pinnacle of sportscar racing since taking up his current role in 2018.

PRIME: The winding road that brought McLaren back to Le Mans

“We would have to work on a two-year lead time: if we were talking about ’26 we would need to make a decision tomorrow.

“You wouldn’t want to enter a championship Le Mans in its last season.”

Brown revealed that McLaren is “looking at all the scenarios” with regard to its first top-flight sportscar campaign since the F1 GTR programme of the 1990s.

Zak Brown, CEO, McLaren Racing, celebrates victory with his team

Zak Brown, CEO, McLaren Racing, celebrates victory with his team

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

“But clearly if you are in sportscar racing you want to win Le Mans,” he said.

Brown has previously stated that McLaren’s ambitions lay in the WEC with a factory team of LMDhs and potentially customer cars in IMSA.

“LMDh would be the more favourable category,” he confirmed.

What cannot be known is whether there will be room in the WEC for another manufacturer in Hypercar later in the decade: the grid is likely to be at capacity next year despite its expansion to 40 cars.

McLaren’s LMGT3 class campaign with United Autosports in the WEC this year could be crucial in paving the way for a step up in class, explained Brown.

“We need commercial partners and the exposure we get in GT3 will give us a sense of what the commercial market is and how much support we can get,” he said.

Brown also stressed it will be important that a top-flight sportscar programme doesn’t distract from McLaren Racing’s other activities in Formula 1, IndyCar, Formula E and Extreme E.

“If we take on another project we have to make sure it doesn’t disrupt our other activities,” he said.

“We are not far away from feeling we could take on another project without diluting our F1 team or IndyCar team or our electric teams.

#70 Inception Racing McLaren 720S LMGT3 Evo: Brendan Iribe, Ollie Millroy, Frederik Schandorff

#70 Inception Racing McLaren 720S LMGT3 Evo: Brendan Iribe, Ollie Millroy, Frederik Schandorff

Photo by: Marc Fleury

“We are turning a profit as a racing team; McLaren Racing is very healthy, and then it is just about timing.”

Michael Leiters, CEO of McLaren Automotive, insisted that none of the key technical decisions about a potential LMDh project have been made.

That includes the choice of engine: the unsuitability of its M840T road car V8 was one reason why McLaren’s prototype aspirations have remained on hold.

“First we have to decide when and how to do it, and then we come to the engine,” he explains.

“It would be perfect to have an engine in line with our road car programmes — that would be our dream — but we would never compromise our competitiveness.”

Read Also:

Watch: 2024 Le Mans 24hrs Analysis — Ferrari Rain Supreme



Source link

Drugovich hopes Le Mans debut «opens some doors» as future remains unclear


Aston Martin Formula 1 reserve Felipe Drugovich hopes that his Le Mans 24 Hours debut will “open some doors”, as he debates remaining in sportscar racing or returning to single-seaters.

Drugovich made his first appearance in the French endurance classic last weekend as he joined Action Express Racing at the wheel of a factory Cadillac V-Series.R in the Hypercar class.

Together with IMSA SportsCar Championship regulars Pipo Derani and Jack Aitken, he finished 15th in class after Derani heavily damaged the #311 Cadillac in a crash at Indianapolis in the 19th hour.

Asked if he sees his future in formula cars or prototypes in the wake of his maiden outing in an LMDh prototype, Drugovich told Motorsport.com: “I don’t know yet.

“For sure I enjoyed [Le Mans] really a lot. It’s a really cool world and I’m enjoying it.

“Also, this race can sometimes open me some doors. We will see what is going to happen. For the moment I’m really happy with the opportunities I have.”

#311 Whelen Cadillac Racing Cadillac V-Series.R: Pipo Derani, Jack Aitken, Felipe Drugovich

#311 Whelen Cadillac Racing Cadillac V-Series.R: Pipo Derani, Jack Aitken, Felipe Drugovich

Photo by: Emanuele Clivati | AG Photo

Drugovich’s La Sarthe outing with Cadillac was the highlight of his 2024 campaign, which includes a full-season with the Vector Sport LMP2 squad.

As things stand, he is not lined up to compete in any more WEC or IMSA races with Cadillac. That is despite the General Motors brand having signed only two drivers for the full-season in its sole Hypercar entry, with the last remaining seat to be decided on a race-by-race basis or left completely vacant for shorter events.

The 2022 Formula 2 champion made it clear he is keen on competing in more endurance races in the near future, saying “these 24 hour races have always been kind of a dream for me so I’m really happy [to take part in them].”

Drugovich spent the 2023 season on the sidelines following his title success in F2, as he elected to focus on his test and reserve duties with Aston Martin in F1.

After failing to find a spot on this year’s F1 grid, he announced a switch to sportscar racing in the ELMS, while maintaining that he hasn’t lost sight of his F1 dream.

Drugovich, who also tested a Maserati Formula E car for a second time in Berlin last month, said his racing juices have started flowing again after a year out of competitive action.

“I was buzzing to get back racing again this year and so happy to be back doing ELMS and especially [Le Mans], this is something impressive,” he said.

“It’s just a massive opportunity given from Cadillac. It’s not everywhere that a manufacturer puts a rookie driver into a hypercar, especially at Le Mans. So very grateful to them.”

Read Also:



Source link

The Le Mans Hypercar strength Cadillac’s LMDh couldn’t fight against


2024 marked the second year of the merged Le Mans Hypercar and LMDh regulations into the WEC’s Hypercar category, ruled by a Balance of Performance, but LMDh cars are yet to grab their first win at the Le Mans 24 Hours after an extremely competitive race this year.

Together with veteran Richard Westbrook, Earl Bamber and Alex Lynn had achieved a third-place finish in their Cadillac V-Series.R in the 2023 contest, led by the #51 Ferrari and the #8 Toyota. But this time around, only LMH machinery made it to the podium at Circuit de la Sarthe – the #50 Ferrari took the win from the #7 Toyota and the #51 Ferrari.

The polesitting #6 Porsche LMDh was just one second off the podium, with Andre Lotterer’s fears that team-mate Kevin Estre’s «exceptional» pole lap «maybe is not 100% representative of the performance» somewhat justified.

Meanwhile, the #2 Cadillac LMDh now shared by Bamber and Lynn with Alex Palou was in contention for a win for a long time, leading after 21 hours. However, it suffered from higher-than-average tyre degradation in mixed track conditions and ended up seventh under the chequered flag.

«At one point, it was looking very good, but in the end, I think Ferrari and Toyota just had a little bit more pace in all conditions,» Alex Lynn told Motorsport.com.

«That was ultimately the difference. At certain points we could match them, but never have something extra. Also, they were always very, very competitive. I think we were looking okay for a P3, but in the end we had a bad last hour or so, and that was it.»

«The Hypercars are very strong with the four-wheel drive, that’s why they’re all on the podium», Earl Bamber added when speaking to Motorsport.com. «It’s hard to fight against.»

#7 Toyota Gazoo Racing Toyota GR010 - Hybrid: Jose Maria Lopez, Kamui Kobayashi, Nyck De Vries

#7 Toyota Gazoo Racing Toyota GR010 — Hybrid: Jose Maria Lopez, Kamui Kobayashi, Nyck De Vries

Photo by: Alexander Trienitz

Toyota, Ferrari and Peugeot’s four-wheel-drive set-up comes in particularly handy in wet conditions, due to the extra traction this provides compared to the rear-wheel-drive LMDhs. In this particular instance, although a number of showers spiced up the race, this was partly mitigated by the safety car neutralising the race when the rain was at its worst, between 3:45am and 8:10am.

LMH cars were faster in all sectors in the race, with two Toyotas and two Ferraris leading the way on the Mulsanne straight and its two chicanes – the leading LMDh was the #2 Cadillac driven by Palou [1m20.048s], nearly three tenths off Sebastien Buemi’s #8 Toyota [1m19.786].

In the third sector, comprised of many corners with various speed profiles, Alessandro Pier Guidi was fastest in the #51 Ferrari with a 1m35.364s time, but Porsche’s Laurens Vanthoor and Cadillac’s Palou were just 0.085s and 0.089s off respectively.

Of course, the fastest race times were set in dry conditions, and with no session being run fully in wet conditions, analysing fully the advantage enjoyed by LMH cars is tricky.

Porsche’s Frederic Makowiecki admitted to Motorsport.com after the race that the German constructor was «lacking a little bit to be able to compete with Toyota and Ferrari. Not much, but a little too much.

«The difference is [Ferrari] can overtake you, but you can’t overtake them! This is getting complicated: we’re not quite on an equal footing.»

The aforementioned sector 2 times on the Mulsanne straight tend to corroborate the French veteran’s analysis. On the other hand, three cars recorded a 344.5km/h top speed in the race – both Toyotas and… Felipe Nasr’s #4 Porsche. But it was the only instance when one of the German cars went above 339.1km/h over the 24 hours, with the Brazilian driver most likely catching a big tow.

Looking at each car’s average top five speed-trap entries, the picture becomes clearer with both Toyotas on 342.6km/h and 342.1km/h and two Ferraris on 340.9km/h and 340.6km/h. The top LMDh becomes the #36 Alpine on 339.1km/h, with the quickest Porsche reaching 338.9km/h thanks to Jota’s #12 customer entry and no Cadillac doing any better than 336km/h for the #2 car.

In the end, there is little regret in the American camp. «Ultimately, I think this race we maximised,» Lynn added. «I was really proud of how we did. We had, I think, a really strong race. It was just Ferrari and Toyota in particular.

«Obviously I know we got beaten by two Porsches, but I don’t feel like they were better. We lost to them, but Ferrari and Toyota were better.»

Read Also:



Source link

Ferrari’s WEC title hopes «back on track» after Le Mans win


Ferrari believes it is back in the hunt for the 2024 World Endurance Championship after claiming its first win of the season at the Le Mans 24 Hours.

This had left the #50 crew a distant fifth in the drivers’ standings, 34 points off the championship-leading Porsche trio of Laurens Vanthoor, Kevin Estre and Andre Lotterer, while Ferrari itself trailed both Porsche and Toyota in the manufacturers’ table.
However, the Italian marque managed to strike back in the most prestigious round of the year, with Fuoco, Molina and Nielsen claiming an impressive win from fourth on the grid and Alessandro Pier Guidi, James Calado and Antonio Giovinazzi joining them on the podium in third in the #51 car.

The result has elevated the #50 trio to second in the drivers’ championship and just nine points off the #6 crew, with Ferrari now trailing Porsche by the same margin in the manufacturers’ battle.

Antonello Coletta, Ferrari’s sportscar racing chief, described the victory in the double-points WEC round in France as a turning point for its championship challenge.

«Honestly, we lost a lot of points in Imola and Spa because today we could come here [after Le Mans] with three victories on our table. Unfortunately [we have] just one, but probably the most important one,» he said.

#50 Ferrari AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Antonio Fuoco, Miguel Molina, Nicklas Nielsen

#50 Ferrari AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Antonio Fuoco, Miguel Molina, Nicklas Nielsen

Photo by: Emanuele Clivati | AG Photo

«It’s normal that we are at the turnaround [point] of the championship and we have a chance to make all our best efforts to win the championship. At the end, the world championship is a maximum result — the 24 Hours of Le Mans and the World Championship. 

«We won a lot of world championships with the GT class and why not with the prototype.»

The WEC heads to Sao Paulo and then Austin in the coming months as part of the American leg of the championship, with both venues returning to the calendar after long absences. Six and eight-hour fixtures in Fuji and Bahrain will bring the season to a close.

Ferrari’s technical director for sportscar racing Ferdinando Cannizzo was equally upbeat about the Prancing Horse’s prospects for the title, but is uncertain just how competitive the 499P will be in the second half of the campaign.

«For sure we recovered a bit and we are probably back on track to win the championship,» he said.

«About the next races [it] will be difficult. It will be difficult because we need to digest the victory quickly, we need to focus on Brazil. Brazil is very close so we need to rest, keep the focus on the new races [which are] completely different. Interlagos is a difficult track. 

«What I can answer is we need to [repeat] the job that we did for Le Mans or for Spa or for Imola.

Podium: Race winner #50 Ferrari AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Antonio Fuoco, Miguel Molina, Nicklas Nielsen

Podium: Race winner #50 Ferrari AF Corse Ferrari 499P: Antonio Fuoco, Miguel Molina, Nicklas Nielsen

Photo by: Alexander Trienitz

«There is work on the simulation and to understand how we exploit it for the race. I don’t know at the moment if we will be competitive or not but of course, we will work very hard in all the last races of the season so we can say hello to the championship. 

«Our target is always to close the season with the title and we will work hard to bring it home.»

Ferrari threw away a near-certain victory at Imola due to two strategic errors in rainy conditions, while another potential win was lost at Spa when the red flag left its cars in an unfavourable position for the restart. It protested against the results of the Belgian round in the immediate aftermath of the race, but it was rejected by the stewards. It has since appealed the decision.

Speaking after its win at Le Mans, Ferrari revealed the extent it went to to ensure it doesn’t face a similar breakdown in communication during crucial pitstop calls. 

The Italian manufacturer split the strategy when rain arrived for the first time in the third hour at La Sarthe, and the #50 factory entry and the #83 satellite car emerged with a major lead by staying out on a rapidly drying track.

«I organised a lot of meetings after Imola, with the mechanics, with the engineering, with the drivers,» revealed Coletta. «I spoke with all of them because I would understand exactly the problem that we had and why we had the misunderstanding. 

«And now I believe that we demonstrate we work very very well. I think that all the choices we took in the race have been correct. 

«No misunderstanding, no error with the call of the car on the box. And probably the race of Imola has been a big help for this 24-hour.

«But I’m very, very happy about the answer of the team after the problem on the Italian GP (sic) because frankly for me it has been a disaster to lose in front of our [home] fans.» 

Read Also:



Source link

The «unorthodox» approach taken by Manthey in Le Mans LMGT3-winning strategy


«Unorthodox» strategic calls made by the Manthey EMA Porsche team proved crucial in setting up its Le Mans 24 Hours LMGT3 class victory, driver Yasser Shahin has explained.

The Australian’s win in the double points round of the World Endurance Championship, together with team-mates Richard Lietz and Morris Schuring, puts his #91 Porsche 911 GT3 R into the joint lead of the pro-am category that replaced GTE Am for this year.

Speaking to Motorsport.com, bronze-graded racer Shahin explained that «there are a lot of things that were unconventional about Manthey’s approach» that yielded victory by a lap over the #31 WRT BMW M4 on his first attempt at the French endurance classic.

After taking the race start, one of just four cars to deploy their bronzes from the outset, Shahin completed a double stint when the first of many showers that blighted the race prompted Manthey to insert 19-year-old silver driver Schuring, a fellow event rookie.

«It started to rain and we thought we really wanted an early advantage in mixed conditions, and so we put Morris in with fresh tyres and that paid off,» Shahin explained.

«But it meant that I didn’t do the planned triple stint and I only did a double. And then when I got in the car two hours later, we knew it was going to be a struggle to make up my [minimum six-hour driving] time.

«So three stints in, the engineer and I had a chat and he said ‘Look, can you do a fourth?’

«So I did a quadruple stint, and that’s not particularly orthodox on one set of tyres! I’ve never done a quad before.»

#91 Manthey Ema Porsche 911 GT3 R LMGT3: Yasser Shahin, Morris Schuring, Richard Lietz

#91 Manthey Ema Porsche 911 GT3 R LMGT3: Yasser Shahin, Morris Schuring, Richard Lietz

Photo by: Alexander Trienitz

Shahin later returned to the car during the lengthy safety car during the early hours of Sunday morning and stayed in once his mandatory time had concluded to give Lietz and Schuring a longer break.

«Me staying in the car longer not only made them fresher,» he pointed out.

«It meant that if we could defer my pit stop to as late as possible, to the track going green, whoever got in would have the freshest set of tyres.»

Factory driver Lietz duly took over for the race restart and had just overtaken the sister #92 Manthey car Klaus Bachler, shared with Joel Sturm and Alexander Malykhin, before it was forced into a 24-minute pitstop to resolve gearbox problems.

Now a five-time Le Mans class winner since he too won on his event debut in 2007, Lietz acknowledged that Manthey’s strategy had been significant in ensuring «we have done the race without any major wrong decisions», but revealed he was not always in agreement with the calls that were taken.

«I asked for several things and nothing happened,» he told Motorsport.com. «But it’s OK, we won, so forget about this!»

The delays for the #92 car, which was classified tenth of the regular WEC entrants at Le Mans, combined with a second maximum score in as many rounds has brought the #91 crew back into the title fight after taking no points from the first two races in Qatar and Imola due to mechanical problems and accident damage respectively.

Shahin admitted the turnaround in the team’s fortunes had come as a surprise, as he «thought we had no chance» of contending for the championship after its early setbacks before winning last time out at Spa with Lietz’s final lap pass on Bachler.

«We had a throttle body failure in race one, completely unlucky,» he said.

«Race two was just a debacle, and genuinely, none of our fault; a 200 km/h race start, followed by people hitting the brakes after it went green.

«We threw away the first two, and so we had no prospect of being back in the championship.

«This has just reversed all that with two consecutive wins.

«Morris and Richie were just saying, ‘Look, I can feel we’re good enough, we just need some momentum’. And so it’s been nice.»

Read Also:



Source link

BMW won’t accept Ferrari’s «very unfair» penalty for Vanthoor/Kubica crash


Six hours and 35 minutes into the World Endurance Championship’s most prestigious race, the #83 Ferrari 499P driven by Kubica swerved into Vanthoor’s #15 BMW M Hybrid V8 as they lapped the #92 Manthey Pure Rxcing GT3 entry on the approach to Mulsanne corner, which sent the Belgian driver into the wall and caused the BMW’s retirement from the race.

The #83 Ferrari was given a 30-second stop-and-go penalty but managed to stay on the lead lap, which allowed it to remain in victory contention thanks to current safety car rules gathering all cars on the lead lap when the race is neutralised.

Vanthoor was furious with the stewards’ decision and took to X (formerly Twitter) to express his discontent: «Thanks for all your messages, I’m okay! Just a small concussion! Just a bad day for our sport, pushing someone off at 300km/h and getting a 30-sec penalty. Sorry @FIAWEC, losing trust here.»

Team boss Vosse told Motorsport.com that it was intolerable that the Ferrari which had caused the crash was able to find its way back to the front of the pack, and said he would have advocated for a three-minute or five-minute penalty – which would have dropped the #83 car a lap down.

«At the end, it is something that we will not accept,» the Belgian said. «For me, the penalty was very unfair. You take the race away from someone. You deserve to be somehow slowed down much more than being able to fight for the podium again three hours later.»

Vincent Vosse, Team principal WRT

Vincent Vosse, Team principal WRT

Photo by: Marc Fleury

However, Vosse has no hard feelings for Kubica, a former Team WRT driver who won the ELMS and WEC championships in the LMP2 class with the Belgian outfit in 2021 and 2023 respectively, while coming second at the Le Mans 24 Hours last year with team-mates Rui Andrade and Louis Deletraz.

«I’m close to Robert – he drove for us for a few years,» Vosse pointed out. «We won the championship with him last year, and he’s someone that I respect a lot.

«I will say that I did not expect something like that from him, but I will not judge him. First, I will cool down and speak to him probably next week about the incident.

«From a sportsman of his level – and he’s really a sportsman, because I see him like that – I have to say, unfortunately, I’ve been disappointed about the situation.»

The Le Mans 24 Hours has been disappointing overall for the BMW factory Hypercar squad, with Marco Wittmann spinning the same #15 car on lap 6, while Robin Frijns crashed the #20 machine after bouncing off a kerb at the Ford chicane at 6:23pm. The car limped to the pits and went back on track only 21 hours later to see the chequered flag, without being classified.

Andreas Roos, head of BMW M Motorsport, explained to Motorsport.com that the car could have been back on track earlier but the German constructor didn’t want to risk further damage ahead of the Sao Paulo WEC round on 14 July.

«Le Mans can always be quite brutal,» Roos added. «First thing is you shouldn’t do any mistakes, which we didn’t manage. Too many mistakes happening.»

«That’s how you try to win races today,» Vosse analysed. «Unfortunately, we saw that we were quick at some stage, but maybe a little bit too quick, or trying too hard.

«We did not learn as much as we had hoped to about our cars, because at the end, we could not go through the night with our cars. Let’s say that we have learned what not to do next year.»

Read Also:

Addtional reporting by Heiko Stritzke and Rachit Thukral



Source link